Aib-based peptide backbone as scaffolds for helical peptide mimics.

Helical peptides that can intervene and disrupt therapeutically important protein-protein interactions are attractive drug targets. In order to develop a general strategy for developing such helical peptide mimics, we have studied the effect of incorporating alpha-amino isobutyric acid (Aib), an amino acid with strong preference for helical backbone, as the sole helix promoter in designed peptides. Specifically, we focus on the hdm2-p53 interaction, which is central to development of many types of cancer. The peptide corresponding to the hdm2 interacting part of p53, helical in bound state but devoid of structure in solution, served as the starting point for peptide design that involved replacement of noninteracting residues by Aib. Incorporation of Aib, while preserving the interacting residues, led to significant increase in helical structure, particularly at the C-terminal region as judged by nuclear magnetic resonance and circular dichroism. The interaction with hdm2 was also found to be enhanced. Most interestingly, trypsin cleavage was found to be retarded by several orders of magnitude. We conclude that incorporation of Aib is a feasible strategy to create peptide helical mimics with enhanced receptor binding and lower protease cleavage rate.

[1]  V. Antonenko,et al.  Comparative study of methods to couple hindered peptides. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[2]  S. Awasthi,et al.  Structural and thermodynamic consequences of introducing alpha-aminoisobutyric acid in the S peptide of ribonuclease S. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[3]  Kyou-Hoon Han,et al.  Local Structural Elements in the Mostly Unstructured Transcriptional Activation Domain of Human p53* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  P. Furet,et al.  Discovery of potent antagonists of the interaction between human double minute 2 and tumor suppressor p53. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  D. Fabbro,et al.  A small synthetic peptide, which inhibits the p53-hdm2 interaction, stimulates the p53 pathway in tumour cell lines. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. , 1999, Science.

[7]  A. Mendelsohn,et al.  Protein Interaction Methods-Toward an Endgame , 1999, Science.

[8]  M. Kubbutat,et al.  Keeping an old friend under control: regulation of p53 stability. , 1998, Molecular medicine today.

[9]  R. Aurora,et al.  Helix capping , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  S F Howard,et al.  Molecular characterization of the hdm2-p53 interaction. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Helix propagation and N‐cap propensities of the amino acids measured in alanine‐based peptides in 40 volume percent trifluoroethanol , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  D. Lane,et al.  Identification of novel mdm2 binding peptides by phage display. , 1996, Oncogene.

[14]  A. Levine,et al.  Structure of the MDM2 Oncoprotein Bound to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Transactivation Domain , 1996, Science.

[15]  C. Harris,et al.  Structure and function of the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues for rational cancer therapeutic strategies. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Aromatic side-chain contribution to far-ultraviolet circular dichroism of helical peptides and its effect on measurement of helix propensities. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[17]  C. Finlay,et al.  The mdm-2 oncogene can overcome wild-type p53 suppression of transformed cell growth , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[18]  V. Saudek,et al.  Gradient-tailored excitation for single-quantum NMR spectroscopy of aqueous solutions , 1992, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[19]  F. Richards,et al.  The chemical shift index: a fast and simple method for the assignment of protein secondary structure through NMR spectroscopy. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[20]  A. Kuki,et al.  Conformational preferences of oligopeptides rich in α‐aminoisobutyric acid. II. A model for the 310/α‐helix transition with composition and sequence sensitivity , 1992, Biopolymers.

[21]  K. Wüthrich NMR of proteins and nucleic acids , 1988 .

[22]  Ad Bax,et al.  MLEV-17-based two-dimensional homonuclear magnetization transfer spectroscopy , 1985 .

[23]  Claudio Toniolo,et al.  Preferred conformations of peptides containing α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acids , 1983 .

[24]  K Wüthrich,et al.  A two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser enhancement (2D NOE) experiment for the elucidation of complete proton-proton cross-relaxation networks in biological macromolecules. , 1980, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[25]  G. Roberts,et al.  NMR of macromolecules : a practical approach , 1993 .

[26]  G R Marshall,et al.  Factors governing helical preference of peptides containing multiple alpha,alpha-dialkyl amino acids. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  J T Yang,et al.  Calculation of protein conformation from circular dichroism. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.

[28]  P. Balaram,et al.  The stereochemistry of peptides containing alpha-aminoisobutyric acid. , 1984, CRC critical reviews in biochemistry.