A Multicenter Trial of a Footdrop Stimulator Controlled by a Tilt Sensor

Objectives. To test the efficacy and acceptance of a footdrop stimulator controlled by a tilt sensor. Methods. A nonrandomized, test-retest study of 26 subjects with footdrop of more than 1 year’s duration, resulting from various central nervous system disorders, was performed in 4 centers for at least 3 months. Speed of walking in a straight line, speed around a figure of 8, and physiological cost index (PCI) were measured with and without the device. Hours/day and steps/day using the device were recorded. Results.All but 2 subjects used the tilt sensor at home, rather than a foot switch. Walking speed increased by 15% after 3 months (n = 26; P < 0.01), 32% after 6 months (n = 16; P < 0.01), and 47% after 12 months (n = 8; P < 0.05), while PCI decreased. The number of steps taken per day of use increased significantly over time, and increased speed was directly correlated with usage. Walking speed also increased with the stimulator off, but to a lesser extent, indicating a training effect. Subject feedback from a questionnaire indicated satisfaction with the stimulator. Conclusions. Both efficacy and acceptance of the stimulator were good in a population of subjects with chronic footdrop.

[1]  J B Walker,et al.  Modulation of spasticity: prolonged suppression of a spinal reflex by electrical stimulation. , 1982, Science.

[2]  P. Veltink,et al.  The Sensitivity and Selectivity of an Implantable Two‐Channel Peroneal Nerve Stimulator System for Restoration of Dropped Foot , 2002, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[3]  P. Taylor,et al.  Experience of clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator. , 1997, Artificial organs.

[4]  Jane Burridge,et al.  The Effect of Common Peroneal Nerve Stimulation on Quadriceps Spasticity in Hemiplegia , 1997 .

[5]  Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Spasticity in Hemiplegic and Spinal Cord Injury Subjects , 2001, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[6]  J. Norton,et al.  Clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator: its effect on the speed and effort of walking. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  R B Stein,et al.  Application of tilt sensors in functional electrical stimulation. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Liberson Wt,et al.  Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. , 1961, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  G. M. Lyons,et al.  Modified implanted drop foot stimulator system with graphical user interface for customised stimulation pulse-width profiles , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  R Merletti,et al.  Clinical experience of electronic peroneal stimulators in 50 hemiparetic patients. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  R. Waters,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve for hemiplegia. Long-term clinical follow-up. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  Janice J Eng,et al.  Effects of a simple functional electric system and/or a hinged ankle-foot orthosis on walking in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  J. F. Yang,et al.  Optimal stimulation of paralyzed muscle after human spinal cord injury. , 1992, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  R. Stein,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of electrical stimulation systems for walking. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  L. Sawaki,et al.  Use-dependent plasticity of the human motor cortex in health and disease , 2005, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[16]  A. Stefanovska,et al.  FES and spasticity , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  J MacGregor.  The evaluation of patient performance using long-term ambulatory monitoring technique in the domiciliary environment. , 1981, Physiotherapy.

[18]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  A review of portable FES-based neural orthoses for the correction of drop foot , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  R. Waters,et al.  Experimental correction of footdrop by electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  A. Kralj,et al.  Enhancement of hemiplegic patient rehabilitation by means of functional electrical stimulation , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.