Area equivalents for spinning reserve determination in interconnected power systems

The current study applies the cost-benefit analysis method to determine the optimal amount of spinning reserve. However, it is difficult for the method to handle large size problem, like large interconnected power systems with several control areas, directly. Therefore, this paper proposes a power system equivalent for the original system to reduce the complexity of the original problem. According to the proposed algorithm, each area of the system is first modeled by an equivalent system, obtained by the REI (radial – equivalent – independent) method, and an interconnected REI equivalent is obtained for the original interconnected system. A cost-benefit analysis is then performed to determine the spinning reserve requirements of both the original and equivalent systems. The cost-benefit algorithm considers either the SCUC (security constrained unit commitment) or the SCED (security constrained economic dispatch). Finally, the proposed interconnected REI equivalent is evaluated by comparing the spinning reserve of each control area in the original system with that in the equivalent system. Numerical studies are performed on two IEEE test systems.

[1]  Paul Dimo,et al.  Nodal analysis of power systems , 1975 .

[2]  Kevin Leyton-Brown,et al.  Automated Configuration of Mixed Integer Programming Solvers , 2010, CPAIOR.

[3]  Jakob Stoustrup,et al.  Integration of Flexible Consumers in the Ancillary Service Markets , 2014 .

[4]  G. Irisarri,et al.  Steady State Network Equivalents for Power System Planning Applications , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[5]  Esteban Gil,et al.  Evaluating the contribution of intermittent generation to power system adequacy at different demand levels , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[6]  Ebrahim Shayesteh,et al.  Efficient Simulation Methods of Large Power Systems with High Penetration of Renewable Energy Resources: Theory and Applications , 2015 .

[7]  Savu Crivat Savulescu Real-Time Stability Assessment in Modern Power System Control Centers , 2009 .

[8]  T. E. Dy Liacco,et al.  An On-Line Topological Equivalent of a Power System , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[9]  Yonghong Chen,et al.  The security-constrained commitment and dispatch for Midwest ISO day-ahead co-optimized energy and ancillary service market , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[10]  Ali Ahmadi-Khatir,et al.  A probabilistic spinning reserve market model considering DisCo different value of lost loads , 2011 .

[11]  M. Fotuhi-Firoozabad,et al.  Allocation of spinning reserve among generating units using a hybrid deterministic/probabilistic approach , 2004, 2004 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering (IEEE Cat. No.04EX819).

[12]  José Pablo Chaves-Ávila,et al.  Demand response in liberalized electricity markets: Analysis of aggregated load participation in the German balancing mechanism , 2014 .

[13]  Savu C. Savulescu Equivalents for Security Analysis of Power Systems , 1981 .

[14]  Federico Milano,et al.  Dynamic REI equivalents for short circuit and transient stability analyses , 2009 .

[15]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Determining reserve requirements in DK1 area of Nord Pool using a probabilistic approach , 2014 .

[16]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Víctor Manuel Fernandes Mendes,et al.  Self-scheduling for energy and spinning reserve of wind/CSP plants by a MILP approach , 2014 .