The media inequality: Comparing the initial human-human and human-AI social interactions

As human-machine communication has yet to become prevalent, the rules of interactions between human and intelligent machines need to be explored. This study aims to investigate a specific question: During human users' initial interactions with artificial intelligence, would they reveal their personality traits and communicative attributes differently from human-human interactions? A sample of 245 participants was recruited to view six targets' twelve conversation transcripts on a social media platform: Half with a chatbot Microsoft's Little Ice, and half with human friends. The findings suggested that when the targets interacted with Little Ice, they demonstrated different personality traits and communication attributes from interacting with humans. Specifically, users tended to be more open, more agreeable, more extroverted, more conscientious and self-disclosing when interacting with humans than with AI. The findings not only echo Mischel's cognitive-affective processing system model but also complement the Computers Are Social Actors Paradigm. Theoretical implications were discussed. During initial interactions with AI, would users reveal their personality differently?An exploratory study was conducted to examine users' performance.Facing AI, users demonstrated different personality from interacting with humans.Users were less open, agreeable, extroverted and conscientious when interacting with AI.The findings echo Mischel's cognitive-affective processing system model.

[1]  C. Nass,et al.  Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices , 1997 .

[2]  C. Nass,et al.  Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001 .

[3]  Noëlle Carbonell,et al.  User Representations of Computer Systems in Human-Computer Speech Interaction , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[4]  Yan Huang,et al.  Toward a Theory of Interactive Media Effects (TIME) , 2015 .

[5]  P. Costa,et al.  Updating Norman's "Adequate Taxonomy": intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Erin E. Hollenbaugh,et al.  Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Jeffrey A. Hall,et al.  Impression management and formation on Facebook: A lens model approach , 2014, New Media Soc..

[8]  David Westerman,et al.  Welcoming Our Robot Overlords: Initial Expectations About Interaction With a Robot , 2014 .

[9]  E. Herzka,et al.  [Individual psychology]. , 1950, Hospitalis.

[10]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Is that a bot running the social media feed? Testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on Twitter , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Christopher A. Cooper,et al.  The Big Five Personality Factors and Mass Politics , 2013 .

[12]  Andrea L. Guzman,et al.  The Messages of Mute Machines: Human-Machine Communication with Industrial Technologies , 2016 .

[13]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[14]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PERSONAL SPACE EXPECTATIONS AND THEIR VIOLATIONS , 1976 .

[15]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[16]  Walter Mischel,et al.  Toward an integrative science of the person. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[18]  Kerstin Fischer,et al.  Mindful tutors: Linguistic choice and action demonstration in speech to infants and a simulated robot , 2011 .

[19]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in Human-Robot Interaction , 2008, IEEE Trans. Robotics.

[20]  Wyndham Lewis,et al.  The Machine , 1997 .

[21]  J. Walther,et al.  Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Dimensions of Computer‐Mediated Communication , 2015 .

[22]  David J. Gunkel Communication and Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges for the 21st Century , 2012 .

[23]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  The human use of human beings - cybernetics and society , 1988 .

[24]  Michael Eid,et al.  Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences , 1999 .

[25]  B. Laursen,et al.  Adolescent Intimacy Revisited , 1997, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[26]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[27]  Nicole Shechtman,et al.  Media inequality in conversation: how people behave differently when interacting with computers and people , 2003, CHI '03.

[28]  R. L. Archer,et al.  Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. , 1983 .

[29]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computers be teammates? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  W. Mischel,et al.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. , 1995, Psychological review.

[31]  Jerry R. Hobbs Conversation as Planned Behavior , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Karolina Zawieska,et al.  Suspension of disbelief in social robotics , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.