Are Key Principles for improved health technology assessment supported and used by health technology assessment organizations?

Previously, our group—the International Working Group for HTA Advancement—proposed a set of fifteen Key Principles that could be applied to health technology assessment (HTA) programs in different jurisdictions and across a range of organizations and perspectives. In this commentary, we investigate the extent to which these principles are supported and used by fourteen selected HTA organizations worldwide. We find that some principles are broadly supported: examples include being explicit about HTA goals and scope; considering a wide range of evidence and outcomes; and being unbiased and transparent. Other principles receive less widespread support: examples are addressing issues of generalizability and transferability; being transparent on the link between HTA findings and decision-making processes; considering a full societal perspective; and monitoring the implementation of HTA findings. The analysis also suggests a lack of consensus in the field about some principles—for example, considering a societal perspective. Our study highlights differences in the uptake of key principles for HTA and indicates considerable room for improvement for HTA organizations to adopt principles identified to reflect good HTA practices. Most HTA organizations espouse certain general concepts of good practice—for example, assessments should be unbiased and transparent. However, principles that require more intensive follow-up—for example, monitoring the implementation of HTA findings—have received little support and execution.

[1]  M. Drummond,et al.  Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[2]  P. Neumann,et al.  Cross-national comparison of technology assessment processes , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[3]  G. La Torre,et al.  Health technology assessment agencies: An international overview of organizational aspects , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  Scott D Ramsey,et al.  Health technology assessment in health-care decisions in the United States. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[5]  S. Sullivan,et al.  Economic evaluation in the US: what is the missing link? , 2006, PharmacoEconomics.

[6]  Clare McGrath,et al.  Framework for describing and classifying decision-making systems using technology assessment to determine the reimbursement of health technologies (fourth hurdle systems) , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[7]  Claudia Wild,et al.  BEST PRACTICE IN UNDERTAKING AND REPORTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS , 2002, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Essential elements of a technology and outcomes assessment initiative. , 2007, JAMA.

[9]  Duncan Neuhauser Commentary on the article “Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions” , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[10]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Methods, procedures, and contextual characteristics of health technology assessment and health policy decision making: Comparison of health technology assessment agencies in Germany, United Kingdom, France, and Sweden , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[11]  B. Luce,et al.  Health technology assessment in the United States , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.