Reinventing Research? Information Practices in the Humanities

Researchers in the humanities adopt a wide variety of approaches to their research. Their work tends to focus on texts and images, but they use and also create a wide range of information resources, in print, manuscript and digital forms. Like other researchers, they face multiple demands on their time, and so they find the ease and speed of access to digital resources very attractive: some of them note that they are reluctant on occasion to consult texts that require a trip to a distant library or archive. Nevertheless, none of the participants in our study is yet ready to abandon print and manuscript resources in favour of digital ones. Rather, they engage with a range of resources and technologies, moving seamlessly between them. Such behaviours are likely to persist for some time.This is reflected also in how researchers disseminate their research. The overwhelmingly dominant channels are the long-established ones such as journal articles, conferences and workshops, monographs and book chapters. We found only limited use – except among philosophers - of blogs and other social media. We noted the doubts expressed in other fields about quality assurance for users of such media, but also concerns about how best to present material that will be read by non-academic audiences.A key change in humanities research over the past 10-15 years has been the growth of more formal and systematic collaboration between researchers. This is a response in part to new funding opportunities, but also to the possibilities opened up by new technology. Over recent years there has also been a shift from the model under which technology specialists tell researchers how to do their research to more constructive engagement. Like other researchers, scholars in the humanities use what works for them, finding technologies and resources that fit their research, and resisting any pressure to use something just because it is new.But there is little evidence as yet of their taking full advantage of the possibilities of more advanced tools for text-mining, grid or cloud computing, or the semantic web; and only limited uptake of even simple, freely-available tools for data management and sharing. Rather, they manage and store information on their desktops and laptops, and share it with others via email. Barriers to the adoption and take up of new technologies and services include lack of awareness and of institutional training and support, but also lack of standardization and inconsistencies in quality and functionality across different resources. These make for delays in research, repetitive searching, and limitations on researchers’ ability to draw connections and relationships between different resources.

[1]  Stephen Lehmann,et al.  Humanists and Electronic Information Services: Acceptance and Resistance. , 1991 .

[2]  Simon Tanner Digital Futures: Strategies for the Information Age , 2009, ELPUB.

[3]  Joan M. Cherry,et al.  Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche , 2000, Inf. Res..

[4]  V. Dirksen,et al.  Social Imaginaries of Technology and Work. A connective ethnography , 2007 .

[5]  Susan Siegfried,et al.  An Analysis of Search Terminology Used by Humanities Scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report Number 1 , 1993, The Library Quarterly.

[6]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are online catalogs still hard to use , 1996 .

[7]  Jr. Stephen E. Wiberley Habits of humanists: scholarly behavior and new information technologies , 1991 .

[8]  Rob Kling,et al.  a Bit More to It: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio-technical Interaction Networks , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Melissa Terras,et al.  If You Build It Will They Come? The LAIRAH Study: Quantifying the Use of Online Resources in the Arts and Humanities through Statistical Analysis of User Log Data , 2006, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[10]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The cascade of interactions in the digital library interface , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[11]  Sue Stone,et al.  Humanities scholars: Information Needs and Uses , 1982, J. Documentation.

[12]  Vivian Cothey,et al.  A longitudinal study of World Wide Web users' information-searching behavior , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Laura J. Neumann,et al.  The Information Work of Interdisciplinary Humanities Scholars: Exploration and Translation , 2002, The Library Quarterly.

[15]  Helen R. Tibbo,et al.  Indexing for the humanities , 1994 .

[16]  Stephen E. Wiberley,et al.  Humanists Revisited: A Longitudinal Look at the Adoption of Information Technology , 1994 .

[17]  Rebecca Watson-Boone The Information Needs and Habits of Humanities Scholars. , 1994 .

[18]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative Web Research for the Social Sciences , 2009, Introduction to Webometrics.

[19]  Rebecca Green,et al.  Locating Sources in Humanities Scholarship: The Efficacy of following Bibliographic References , 2000, The Library Quarterly.

[20]  A. Barrett The information-seeking habits of graduate student researchers in the Humanities , 2005 .

[21]  Wendy Anderson Corpus Linguistics in the UK: Resources for Sociolinguistic Research , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[22]  Eric T. Meyer Socio-Technical Interaction Networks: A Discussion of the Strengths, Weaknesses and Future of Kling's STIN Model , 2006, HCC.

[23]  Stephen E. Wiberley,et al.  Time and Technology: A Decade-Long Look at Humanists' Use of Electronic Information Technology , 2000 .

[24]  E. Straub Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning , 2009 .