A quantitative method for estimating hepatic blood flow using a dual-input single-compartment model.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of a quantitative method for estimating arterial hepatic blood flow and portal hepatic blood flow separately using a dual-input single-compartment model compared with the maximum slope method using computer simulations and clinical data. In computer simulations, the rate constants for the transfer of contrast agent (CA) from the hepatic artery to the liver (K(1a)), from the portal vein to the liver (K(1p)) and from the liver to the blood (k(2)) were estimated from simulated time-density curves with various transit times of CA from the aorta to the liver (tau(a)) and from the portal vein to the liver (tau(p)) using the linear least-squares (LLSQ) method. In clinical studies, dynamic CT data were acquired from 27 patients, and parametric maps of K(1a), K(1p) and k(2) were generated by applying the LLSQ method pixel by pixel. In simulation studies, tau(a) and tau(p) were found to have a large and a small effect on the estimates of K(1a) and K(1p), respectively. In clinical studies, the K(1a) and K(1p) values estimated with the maximum slope method were underestimated by 60+/-29% and 37+/-12%, respectively, compared with those estimated by the LLSQ method. In conclusion, our results suggest that correction of tau(a) is necessary for accurately estimating K(1a) and K(1p). Our method is therefore promising for the evaluation of hepatic blood flow in various liver diseases because it allows us to evaluate arterial hepatic blood flow and portal hepatic blood flow separately and visually.

[1]  Edwards Cl,et al.  Quantitative Blood Flow Measurement of Skeletal Muscle Using Oxygen-15-Water and PET , 1997 .

[2]  C. McArdle,et al.  Detection of colorectal liver metastases: comparison of laparotomy, CT, US, and Doppler perfusion index and evaluation of postoperative follow-up results. , 1995, Radiology.

[3]  P. Price,et al.  Clinical measurement of blood flow in tumours using positron emission tomography: a review. , 2002, Nuclear medicine communications.

[4]  K. Murase,et al.  Determination of arterial input function using fuzzy clustering for quantification of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast‐enhanced MR imaging , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Kenya Murase,et al.  Effect of x-ray tube current on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by CT perfusion studies , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  L. Bass,et al.  Liver kinetics of glucose analogs measured in pigs by PET: importance of dual-input blood sampling. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  K. Murase,et al.  An efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters in a dual-input single-compartment model. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  S. Dechambre,et al.  Dynamic computed tomography with low- and high-molecular-mass contrast agents to assess microvascular permeability modifications in a model of liver fibrosis. , 2002, Clinical science.

[9]  F R Verdun,et al.  Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  H. Rusinek,et al.  Perfusion imaging of the liver: current challenges and future goals. , 2005, Radiology.

[11]  S. Delorme,et al.  Non-invasive vascular imaging: assessing tumour vascularity , 1998, European Radiology.

[12]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Perfusion CT in patients with advanced bronchial carcinomas: a novel chance for characterization and treatment monitoring? , 2004, European Radiology.

[13]  A K Dixon,et al.  Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT. , 1993, Radiology.

[14]  F Frouin,et al.  Early changes in liver perfusion caused by occult metastases in rats: detection with quantitative CT. , 2001, Radiology.

[15]  B. V. Van Beers,et al.  Non-invasive quantification of liver perfusion with dynamic computed tomography and a dual-input one-compartmental model. , 2000, Clinical science.

[16]  M Kormano,et al.  Liver Perfusion Studied with Ultrafast CT , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  R Materne,et al.  Hepatic perfusion parameters in chronic liver disease: dynamic CT measurements correlated with disease severity. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  A. Herneth,et al.  Hepatic perfusion after liver transplantation: noninvasive measurement with dynamic single-section CT. , 1998, Radiology.

[19]  Kenya Murase,et al.  Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.