Binary Choice Health State Valuation and Mode of Administration: Head-to-Head Comparison of Online and CAPI

[1]  D. Paulhus.  Two-component models of socially desirable responding. , 1984 .

[2]  P. Dolan,et al.  Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. , 1996, Journal of health economics.

[3]  P. Dolan,et al.  Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. , 1997, Medical care.

[4]  William C. Schmidt,et al.  World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions , 1997 .

[5]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Estimating General-population Utilities Using One Binary-gamble Question per Respondent , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al.  The Web Experiment Method , 2000 .

[7]  M. Birnbaum.  Psychological experiments on the internet , 2000 .

[8]  J. Brazier,et al.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. , 2002, Journal of health economics.

[9]  Stuart Myerburg,et al.  Measurement Issues Related to Data Collection on the World Wide Web , 2003, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[10]  J. Baron,et al.  The Validity of Person Tradeoff Measurements: Randomized Trial of Computer Elicitation Versus Face-to-Face Interview , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  P. Alexandre,et al.  Further Evidence on the Labor Market Effects of Addiction: Chronic Drug Use and Employment in Metropolitan Miami , 2004 .

[12]  J. Brazier,et al.  The Estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health From the SF-12 , 2004, Medical care.

[13]  G. Eysenbach.  The Law of Attrition , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  Niels Schillewaert,et al.  Comparing response distributions of offline and online data collection methods , 2005 .

[15]  Niels Schillewaert,et al.  Comparing Response Distributions of Offline and Online , 2005 .

[16]  A. Bowling.  Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. , 2005, Journal of public health.

[17]  Jeanne M. Landgraf,et al.  Feasibility, reliability, and validity of adolescent health status measurement by the Child Health Questionnaire Child Form (CHQ-CF): internet administration compared with the standard paper version , 2007, Quality of Life Research.

[18]  C. Gudex,et al.  Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states , 2009, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[19]  J. Brazier,et al.  Estimating a preference-based single index from the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire. , 2006, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[20]  C. Shaw,et al.  Applying an extended theoretical framework for data collection mode to health services research , 2010, BMC health services research.

[21]  Richard Norman,et al.  Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of online and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off task , 2010, Quality of Life Research.

[22]  L. Morales,et al.  Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  J. Brazier,et al.  Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate societal health state utility values , 2010 .

[24]  J. Brazier,et al.  Comparison of health state utility values derived using time trade-off, rank and discrete choice data anchored on the full health-dead scale , 2012, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[25]  J. Brazier,et al.  Valuing child health utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample , 2011, Applied health economics and health policy.

[26]  Deborah J Street,et al.  Time trade-off derived EQ-5D weights for Australia. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[27]  M. Oppe,et al.  UT1 Combining DCE and TTO Into A Single Value Function , 2011 .

[28]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[29]  J. Brazier,et al.  Estimating a Preference-Based Index for a 5-Dimensional Health State Classification for Asthma Derived from the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[30]  Casper J. P. Zhang,et al.  INTERIM SCORING FOR THE EQ-5 D-5 L : MAPPING THE EQ-5 D-5 L TO EQ-5 D-3 L VALUE SETS Methodology , 2011 .

[31]  J. Brazier,et al.  Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. , 2012, Journal of health economics.

[32]  T. Kohlmann,et al.  Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[33]  D. Lamping,et al.  Estimating preference-based single index measures for dementia using DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[34]  A comparison of three binary choice methods for health state valuation , 2013 .

[35]  J. Brazier,et al.  A Comparison of Methods for Converting DCE Values onto the Full Health-Dead QALY Scale , 2015, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.