Quantification of non‐Darcian flow observed during packer testing in fractured sedimentary rock

[1] High-precision straddle packer tests were conducted in boreholes in a fractured dolostone aquifer using constant rate injection (Q) step tests to identify the conditions of change from Darcian to non-Darcian flow on the basis of Q versus the applied head above ambient (dH), where the ambient head represents static conditions. The linear portion, representing Darcian flow, passes through the origin, but after the onset of non-Darcian flow, there is proportionally less Q per unit dH, and the transmissivity (T) calculated for the test interval using Darcy's law-based models can be substantially underestimated. Onset of nonlinear flow depends on the test interval length and permeability, typically beginning at injection rates less than 0.5 L min−1 for a relatively transmissive (2 × 10−5 m2 s−1) 1.5 m test interval. In studies of nonlinear flow during pumping tests, the Forchheimer equation is commonly used to describe nonlinear flow near the well using a Q2 versus dH relationship. However, for packer tests in fractured rock, we propose the Darcy-Missbach equation, which relates Qn to dH, as an alternative equation. While both equations accurately predict the observed dH within the range of flows used, the Darcy-Missbach exponent (n) describes the degree of deviation from the linear regime; moreover, all calculated exponents were less than 2, implying that the flow is nonlinear but not quadratic in nature. This quantification of the linear to nonlinear flow relations provides for a more accurate identification of the Darcian range, resulting in better T estimates.

[1]  J. L. Lage,et al.  Darcy’s Experiments and the Deviation to Nonlinear Flow Regime , 2000 .

[2]  K. R. Agha,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Modeling of Non-Darcy Flow in Porous Media , 2003 .

[3]  K. Rushton,et al.  The reliability of packer tests for estimating the hydraulic conductivity of aquifers , 1984, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[4]  P. Pehme,et al.  Improved Resolution of Ambient Flow through Fractured Rock with Temperature Logs , 2010, Ground water.

[5]  B. Kueper,et al.  Evaluation of cubic law based models describing single‐phase flow through a rough‐walled fracture , 2004 .

[6]  C. E. Jacob Effective Radius of Drawdown Test to Determine Artesian Well , 1946 .

[7]  T. Rasmussen Laboratory characterization of fluid flow parameters in a porous rock containing a discrete fracture , 1995 .

[8]  C. Tobias,et al.  Transport processes in narrow (capillary) channels , 1985 .

[9]  A. C. Houlsby Routine interpretation of the Lugeon water-test , 1976, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[10]  K. Moutsopoulos,et al.  Experimental investigation of inertial flow processes in porous media. , 2009 .

[11]  Harihar Rajaram,et al.  Saturated flow in a single fracture: evaluation of the Reynolds Equation in measured aperture fields , 1999 .

[12]  Christopher C. Pain,et al.  Non-linear regimes of fluid flow in rock fractures , 2004 .

[13]  W. Durand Dynamics of Fluids , 1934 .

[14]  J. Gale,et al.  WATER FLOW IN A NATURAL ROCK FRACTURE AS A FUNCTION OF STRESS AND SAMPLE SIZE , 1985 .

[15]  G. Marsily Quantitative Hydrogeology: Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers , 1986 .

[16]  J. Gale A numerical, field and laboratory study of flow in rocks with deformable fractures , 1977 .

[17]  L. Dekeyser The Silurian Amabel and Guelph formations of the Bruce Peninsula: insights into stratigraphy and diagenesis from petrography and ground-penetrating radar , 2006 .

[18]  Leland K. Wenzel,et al.  The thiem method for determining permeability of water-bearing materials and its application to the determination of specific yield; results of investigations in the Platte river valley, Nebraska , 1935 .

[19]  Lee Chaflin Atkinson A laboratory and numerical investigation of steady-state, two-regime, radial flow to a well from rough, horizontal, deformable fractures , 1986 .

[20]  Katsuhiko Iwai,et al.  Fundamental studies of fluid flow through a single fracture , 1976 .

[21]  A. D. Young,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics , 1968 .

[22]  L. Murdoch,et al.  Analysis of the hydromechanical behavior of a flat-lying fracture during a slug test , 2007 .

[23]  J. Gale,et al.  Assessing the Permeability Characteristics of Fractured Rock , 1982 .

[24]  Li Li,et al.  The hydromechanical behaviour of a fracture: an in situ experimental case study , 2003 .

[25]  Weidong Zhao,et al.  Experimental study of turbulent unconfined groundwater flow in a single fracture , 2005 .

[26]  P. Basak NON-PENETRATING WELL IN A SEMI-INFINITE MEDIUM WITH NON-LINEAR FLOW , 1977 .

[27]  L. Murdoch,et al.  Introduction to Hydromechanical Well Tests in Fractured Rock Aquifers , 2009, Ground water.

[28]  K. Novakowski,et al.  Borehole measurement of the hydraulic properties of low‐permeability rock , 1997 .

[29]  David J. Brush,et al.  Fluid flow in synthetic rough‐walled fractures: Navier‐Stokes, Stokes, and local cubic law simulations , 2003 .

[30]  R. Pearson,et al.  Improvements in the Lugeon or packer permeability test , 1977, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[31]  H. Schlichting Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[32]  Robert W. Zimmerman,et al.  Effect of shear displacement on the aperture and permeability of a rock fracture , 1998 .

[33]  J. Bear Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[34]  David Nielsen,et al.  Practical handbook of environmental site characterization and ground-water monitoring , 2005 .

[35]  J. Gale,et al.  New Insight Into The Step-Drawdown Test In Fractured-Rock Aquifers , 1994 .

[36]  J. S. Y. Wang,et al.  Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Technical information report No. 23 , 1979 .

[37]  T. W. Doe,et al.  Application of non-linear flow laws in determining rock fissure geometry from single borehole pumping tests , 1986 .

[38]  C. Bordier,et al.  Drainage equations and non-Darcian modelling in coarse porous media or geosynthetic materials , 2000 .

[39]  T W Zeigler Determination of rock mass permeability , 1976 .

[40]  P. F. F. Lancaster-Jones The interpretation of the Lugeon water-test , 1975, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[41]  Y. Maini In situ hydraulic parameters in jointed rock : their measurement and interpretation , 1972 .

[42]  P. Ranjith,et al.  Nonlinear single‐phase flow in real rock joints , 2007 .

[43]  Roger Thunvik,et al.  Determination of formation permeability by double-packer tests , 1984 .

[44]  T. W. Doe,et al.  State of stress, permeability, and fractures in the Precambrian granite of northern Illinois , 1983 .

[45]  A. Michalski,et al.  Characterization of Transmissive Fractures by Simple Tracing of In-Well Flow , 1990 .