A New Proportionate Adaptive Filtering Algorithm with Coefficient Reuse and Robustness Against Impulsive Noise

An adaptive algorithm should ideally present high convergence rate, good steady-state performance, and robustness against impulsive noise. Few algorithms can simultaneously meet these requirements. This paper proposes a local and deterministic optimization problem whose solution gives rise to an adaptive algorithm that presents a higher convergence rate in the identification of sparse systems due to the use of the proportionate adaptation technique. In addition, a correntropy-based cost function is employed in order to enhance its robustness against non-Gaussian noise. Finally, the adoption of coefficient reuse approach results in a good system identification performance in steady-state conditions, especially in low SNR scenarios.

[1]  Diego B. Haddad,et al.  Transient and steady-state MSE analysis of the IMPNLMS algorithm , 2014, Digit. Signal Process..

[2]  Jae-Woo Lee,et al.  Steady-state analysis of the NLMS algorithm with reusing coefficient vector and a method for improving its performance , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[3]  Scott C. Douglas,et al.  Normalized natural gradient adaptive filtering for sparse and non-sparse systems , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[4]  A. Benallal,et al.  Performance study of three different sparse adaptive filtering algorithms for echo cancellation in long acoustic impulse responses , 2017, 2017 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering - Boumerdes (ICEE-B).

[5]  José Carlos Príncipe,et al.  Using Correntropy as a cost function in linear adaptive filters , 2009, 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[6]  Sang Woo Kim,et al.  Derivation of a new normalized least mean squares algorithm with modified minimization criterion , 2009, Signal Process..

[7]  Kazuhiko Ozeki,et al.  An adaptive filtering algorithm using an orthogonal projection to an affine subspace and its properties , 1984 .

[8]  Constantin Paleologu,et al.  Adaptive filtering in acoustic echo cancellation systems — A practical overview , 2017, 2017 9th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI).

[9]  Junwoong Hur,et al.  A Variable Step-Size Normalized Subband Adaptive Filter With a Step-Size Scaler Against Impulsive Measurement Noise , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[10]  Nanning Zheng,et al.  Steady-State Mean-Square Error Analysis for Adaptive Filtering under the Maximum Correntropy Criterion , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  Donald L. Duttweiler,et al.  Proportionate normalized least-mean-squares adaptation in echo cancelers , 2000, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[12]  Diego B. Haddad,et al.  Low-complexity affine projection subband algorithm for robust adaptive filtering in impulsive noise , 2016, 2016 IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM).

[13]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[14]  Manish Narwaria,et al.  Lorentzian Based Adaptive Filters for Impulsive Noise Environments , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[15]  Zhigang Liu,et al.  Robust Set-Membership Normalized Subband Adaptive Filtering Algorithms and Their Application to Acoustic Echo Cancellation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[16]  T Y Al Naffouri,et al.  TRANSIENT ANALYSIS OF DATANORMALIZED ADAPTIVE FILTERS , 2003 .

[17]  S. Haykin Adaptive Filters , 2007 .

[18]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Least-mean-square adaptive filters , 2003 .

[19]  Mariane R. Petraglia,et al.  A unified approach for sparsity-aware and maximum correntropy adaptive filters , 2016, 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[21]  M. Handzic 5 , 1824, The Banality of Heidegger.

[22]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  An error-entropy minimization algorithm for supervised training of nonlinear adaptive systems , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[23]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  Mean-square performance of a family of affine projection algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[24]  Jae-Woo Lee,et al.  A noise-resilient affine projection algorithm and its convergence analysis , 2016, Signal Process..

[25]  Weifeng Liu,et al.  Kernel Adaptive Filtering: A Comprehensive Introduction , 2010 .

[26]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  The quaternion least mean magnitude phase adaptive filtering algorithm , 2017, 2017 22nd International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP).

[27]  Milos Doroslovacki,et al.  Improving convergence of the PNLMS algorithm for sparse impulse response identification , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[28]  Isao Yamada,et al.  Automatic shrinkage tuning based on a system-mismatch estimate for sparsity-aware adaptive filtering , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[29]  Weifeng Liu,et al.  Correntropy: Properties and Applications in Non-Gaussian Signal Processing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.