The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog

In this paper, we study the linking patterns and discussion topics of political bloggers. Our aim is to measure the degree of interaction between liberal and conservative blogs, and to uncover any differences in the structure of the two communities. Specifically, we analyze the posts of 40 "A-list" blogs over the period of two months preceding the U.S. Presidential Election of 2004, to study how often they referred to one another and to quantify the overlap in the topics they discussed, both within the liberal and conservative communities, and also across communities. We also study a single day snapshot of over 1,000 political blogs. This snapshot captures blogrolls (the list of links to other blogs frequently found in sidebars), and presents a more static picture of a broader blogosphere. Most significantly, we find differences in the behavior of liberal and conservative blogs, with conservative blogs linking to each other more frequently and in a denser pattern.

[1]  Kostas Tsioutsiouliklis,et al.  \Googlearchy": How a Few Heavily-Linked Sites Dominate Politics on the Web , 2003 .

[2]  Yiming Yang,et al.  Stochastic link and group detection , 2002, AAAI/IAAI.

[3]  Daniel W. Drezner,et al.  The power and politics of blogs , 2007 .

[4]  Ran El-Yaniv,et al.  Multi-way distributional clustering via pairwise interactions , 2005, ICML.

[5]  Cameron A. Marlow.  Audience, structure and authority in the weblog community , 2004 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Carley.  A Theory of Group Stability , 1991 .

[7]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Topic and Role Discovery in Social Networks , 2005, IJCAI.

[8]  James Newsome,et al.  GEM: Graph EMbedding for routing and data-centric storage in sensor networks without geographic information , 2003, SenSys '03.

[9]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  A PCANS Model of Structure in Organizations , 1998 .

[10]  Matthew Hurst,et al.  BlogPulse: Automated Trend Discovery for Weblogs , 2003 .

[11]  Doug Beeferman,et al.  Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log , 2000, KDD '00.

[12]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  T. Snijders,et al.  Estimation and Prediction for Stochastic Blockstructures , 2001 .

[14]  Inna Kouper,et al.  Conversations in the Blogosphere: An Analysis "From the Bottom Up" , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[16]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Winners don't take all: Characterizing the competition for links on the web , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  S. Hix,et al.  Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001 , 2005, British Journal of Political Science.

[18]  Matthew Hurst,et al.  A Language Model Approach to Keyphrase Extraction , 2003, ACL 2003.

[19]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Discovering Latent Classes in Relational Data , 2004 .

[20]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The Nature of Markets in the World Wide Web , 1999 .

[21]  Daniel J. Fenn,et al.  How does Europe Make Its Mind Up? Connections, cliques, and compatibility between countries in the Eurovision Song Contest , 2005, physics/0505071.

[22]  Lada A. Adamic.  The Small World Web , 1999, ECDL.

[23]  Wray L. Buntine,et al.  Analyzing the US Senate in 2003: Similarities, Networks, Clusters and Blocs , 2004 .