Dependency of image quality on system configuration parameters in a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system.

PURPOSE In principle, a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis (s-DBT) system has better image quality when compared to continuous motion DBT systems due to zero motion blur of the source. The authors have developed a s-DBT system by using a linear carbon nanotube x-ray source array. The purpose of the current study was to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the s-DBT system; and investigate the dependence of imaging quality on the system configuration parameters. METHODS Physical phantoms were used to assess the image quality of each configuration including inplane resolution as measured by the modulation transfer function (MTF), inplane contrast as measured by the signal difference to noise ratio (SdNR), and depth resolution as measured by the z-axis artifact spread function. Five parameters were varied to create five groups of configurations: (1) total angular span; (2) total number of projection images; (3) distribution of exposure (mAs) across the projection images; (4) entrance dose; (5) detector pixel size. RESULTS It was found that the z-axis depth resolution increased with the total angular span but was insensitive to the number of projection images, mAs distribution, entrance dose, and detector pixel size. The SdNR was not affected by the angular span or the number of projection images. A decrease in SdNR was observed when the mAs was not evenly distributed across the projection images. As expected, the SdNR increased with entrance dose and when larger pixel sizes were used. For a given detector pixel size, the inplane resolution was found to be insensitive to the total angular span, number of projection images, mAs distribution, and entrance dose. A 25% increase in the MTF was observed when the detector was operating in full resolution mode (70 μm pixel size) compared to 2 × 2 binned mode (140 μm pixel size). CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that the optimal imaging configuration for a s-DBT system is a large angular span, an intermittent number of projection views, and a uniform mAs distribution over all views. With the detector operating at full resolution, a stationary DBT system can achieve an inplane resolution of 5.1 cycles per mm, which is significantly better than continuous motion DBT systems.

[1]  Yiheng Zhang,et al.  High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array. , 2012, Medical physics.

[2]  Tao Wu,et al.  The Dependence of Tomosynthesis Imaging Performance on the Number of Scan Projections , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[3]  Aruna A. Vedula,et al.  A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[4]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Optimized image acquisition for breast tomosynthesis in projection and reconstruction space. , 2009, Medical physics.

[5]  Renuka Uppaluri,et al.  Effect of acquisition parameters on image quality in digital tomosynthesis , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Tao Wu,et al.  Lesion Visibility in Low Dose Tomosynthesis , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[7]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.

[8]  Michael Waller,et al.  Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[9]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[11]  Tor D Tosteson,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Optimization of continuous tube motion and step-and-shoot motion in digital breast tomosynthesis systems with patient motion , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[14]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis using an amorphous selenium flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Tao Wu,et al.  A new generation FFDM/tomosynthesis fusion system with selenium detector , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[16]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Investigation of the effect of tube motion in breast tomosynthesis: continuous or step and shoot? , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[17]  F Sprenger,et al.  Stationary digital breast tomosynthesis with distributed field emission x-ray tube , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[18]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Dynamic reconstruction and rendering of 3D tomosynthesis images , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[19]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[20]  R M Nishikawa,et al.  Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise. , 2010, Medical physics.

[21]  Kunio Doi,et al.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[22]  J. Boone,et al.  Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner. , 2006, Medical physics.

[23]  Tuyen Phan,et al.  Design and characterization of a spatially distributed multibeam field emission x-ray source for stationary digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2009, Medical physics.

[24]  Guang Yang,et al.  Stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system with a multi-beam field emission x-ray source array , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[25]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[26]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Optimization of detector operation and imaging geometry for breast tomosynthesis , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[28]  Bo Zhao,et al.  A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2007, Medical physics.