Development and Application of a Tool Designed to Evaluate Web Sites Providing Information on Alzheimer's Disease

Informal carers of people with Alzheimer's disease require access to high-quality information, which may be available through the Internet. Tools that have been developed to evaluate the contents of health-related web sites tend to be generic and not specific for diseases or patient groups. The aim of this study was to develop a tool that was specifically designed to evaluate web sites that provide information about Alzheimer's disease for informal carers of people with the disease. The tool was used to evaluate a sample of 15 web sites. The results were compared with those obtained using four generic tools in an earlier study. Several web sites attained high scores using the specific tool, although almost half of the 15 web sites achieved scores of less than 50%. There was a poor correlation between the rankings obtained using the specific tool compared with the generic tool. Web sites generally scored lower using the specific tool compared with one of the generic tools. Further work is required to develop and evaluate the Alzheimer's disease web site evaluation tool to help improve the quality of information available to carers through the Internet.

[1]  White Mh,et al.  Online support for caregivers. Analysis of an Internet Alzheimer mailgroup. , 2000 .

[2]  Peter A. Bath,et al.  Evaluation of Websites that Provide Information on Alzheimer's Disease , 2003, Health Informatics J..

[3]  M. White,et al.  Online support for caregivers. Analysis of an Internet Alzheimer mailgroup. , 2000, Computers in nursing.

[4]  H. Sandvik.  Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence , 1999, BMJ.

[5]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1957 .

[6]  S. Brewster,et al.  Urology and the Internet: an evaluation of Internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics , 2000, BJU international.

[7]  H. Christensen,et al.  Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. , 1997, JAMA.

[9]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Information in practice Towards quality management of medical information on the internet : evaluation , labelling , and filtering of information , 1998 .

[10]  P. Impicciatore,et al.  Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home , 1997, BMJ.

[11]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[13]  M. Winker,et al.  Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association. , 2000, JAMA.

[14]  Paul Kim,et al.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review , 1999, BMJ.

[15]  Josette F. Jones.  Development of a self-assessment method for patients to evaluate health information on the Internet , 1999, AMIA.