A comparison of force and depth of skin indentation upon psychophysical functions of tactile intensity.

Tactile sensory intensities related to force applied to the skin, and depth of skin indentation were measured with a magnitude estimation procedure at various sites on the left hand of four human subjects. These same skin sites were measured for "compressibility"--that is, the indentation depths that resulted from controlled forces. Graphic examination of the magnitude estimation data indicated that, in most cases, growth of sensory intensity was relatively shallow at the lower stimulus intensities, and steeper at higher stimulus intensities. The "breakpoint" between the shallow and the steep legs of the psychophysical functions was routinely found between 0.30 and 0.40 mm of indentation, and between 12.0 and 20.0 mN of force. Two subjects consistently produced positively accelerating psychophysical functions, whereas the other two produced negatively accelerating or nearly linear functions above the breakpoint. Differences in skin compressibility did not systematically alter the exponent of the psychophysical functions, regardless of the stimulus dimension (i.e., force or depth of skin indentation). Psychophysical functions based on controlled depth of skin indentation, at a constant rate of indentation, consistently produced higher r2 values than psychophysical functions based on controlled force. When the exponents of psychophysical functions based on controlled skin indentation were compared across different regions of the hand, the values were ordered such that dorsum of hand greater than finger greater than thenar. It was concluded that tactile sensory intensity is more closely related to depth of skin indentation than to force, but only when the rate of skin indentation is controlled.

[1]  Heikki Hämäläinen,et al.  Peripheral neural basis of tactile sensations in man: II. Characteristics of human mechanoreceptors in the hairy skin and correlations of their activity with tactile sensations , 1981, Brain Research.

[2]  L. Pubols,et al.  Magnitude scaling of displacement and velocity of tactile stimuli applied to the human hand , 1982, Brain Research.

[3]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Scales of apparent force. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  L Kruger,et al.  Quantitative neural and psychophysical data for cutaneous mechanoreceptor function. , 1973, Brain research.

[5]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Direct estimation: effect of methodological factors on scale type. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[6]  A. K. Myers Psychophysical scaling and scales of physical stimulus measurement. , 1982 .

[7]  A B Vallbo,et al.  Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[9]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  J. Greenspan,et al.  The influence of rate of skin indentation on threshold and suprathreshold tactile sensations. , 1984, Somatosensory research.

[11]  Charles J. Vierck Comparisons of punctate, edge and surface stimulation of peripheral, slowly-adapting, cutaneous, afferent units of cats , 1979, Brain Research.

[12]  P. R. Burgess,et al.  Cutaneous Mechanoreceptors and Nociceptors , 1973 .

[13]  S. D. Nihm Polynomial law of sensation. , 1976, The American psychologist.

[14]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[15]  B. H. Pubols Factors affecting cutaneous mechanoreceptor response. II. Changes in mechanical properties of skin with repeated stimulation. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Paul J. Hoffman,et al.  Effect of spacing and range of stimuli on magnitude estimation judgements. , 1963 .

[17]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  A. Vallbo,et al.  STIMULUS-RESPONSE FUNCTIONS OF PRIMARY AFFERENTS AND PSYCHOPHYSICAL INTENSITY ESTIMATION ON MECHANICAL SKIN STIMULATION IN THE HUMAN HAND , 1976 .

[19]  E KIRK,et al.  Quantitative measurements of the elastic properties of the skin and subcutaneous tissue in young and old individuals. , 1949, Journal of gerontology.

[20]  D. Kenshalo Chapter 2 – BIOPHYSICS AND PSYCHOPHYSICS OF FEELING* , 1978 .

[21]  E. Poulton The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. , 1968 .