Adding cetuximab to capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research SAKK.

BACKGROUND To determine the activity and tolerability of adding cetuximab to the oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) combination in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In a multicenter two-arm phase II trial, patients were randomized to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks alone or in combination with standard dose cetuximab. Treatment was limited to a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS Seventy-four patients with good performance status entered the trial. Objective partial response rates after external review and radiological confirmation were 14% and 41% in the XELOX and in the XELOX + Cetuximab arm, respectively. Stable disease has been observed in 62% and 35% of the patients, with 76% disease control in both arms. Cetuximab led to skin rash in 65% of the patients. The median overall survival was 16.5 months for arm A and 20.5 months for arm B. The median time to progression was 5.8 months for arm A and 7.2 months for arm B. CONCLUSION Differences in response rates between the treatment arms indicate that cetuximab may improve outcome with XELOX. The correct place of the cetuximab, oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combinations in first-line treatment of MCC has to be assessed in phase III trials.

[1]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Phase II trial of cetuximab in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  D. Sargent,et al.  Single agent fluorouracil for first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer as standard? , 2007, The Lancet.

[4]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  Bevacizumab (Bev) in combination with XELOX or FOLFOX4: Updated efficacy results from XELOX-1/ NO16966, a randomized phase III trial in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer , 2007 .

[5]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  XELOX compared to FOLFOX4: Survival and response results from XELOX-1/ NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) , 2007 .

[6]  T. Conroy,et al.  Efficacy and safety findings from a randomized phase III study of capecitabine (X) + oxaliplatin (O) (XELOX) vs. infusional 5- FU/LV + O (FOLFOX-6) for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) , 2007 .

[7]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Cetuximab plus 5-FU/FA/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) versus FOLFOX-4 in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): OPUS, a randomized phase II study , 2007 .

[8]  John Mendelsohn,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in cancer. , 2006, Seminars in oncology.

[9]  S. Barni,et al.  Alternating versus continuous "FOLFIRI" in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC): A randomized "GISCAD" trial. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  L. Mineur,et al.  OPTIMOX2, a large randomized phase II study of maintenance therapy or chemotherapy-free intervals (CFI) after FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MRC). A GERCOR study. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Hilde Tobi,et al.  Small proportions: what to report for confidence intervals? , 2005, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[12]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Cetuximab shows activity in colorectal cancer patients with tumors that do not express the epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemistry. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Armando Santoro,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  T. Conroy,et al.  XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin): active first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Neal J Meropol,et al.  Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  D. Kerr,et al.  Comparison of intermittent and continuous palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial , 2003, The Lancet.

[18]  R. Stupp,et al.  Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in first- and second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  G. Peters,et al.  Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[20]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[21]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  R. Simon,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.