A Sustainable Crowdsourced Delivery System to Foster Free-Floating Bike-Sharing

Since bicycles and bike-sharing systems are becoming increasingly important in modern transportation contexts, we suggest in this paper an alternative method to incorporate cycling among the freight transport alternatives within urban areas. We propose pursuing a sustainable initiative of crowdsourced delivery where some of the urban good deliveries may be voluntarily undertaken by users of the free-floating bike-sharing systems while following their prefixed route in exchange for some kind of reward. We believe that a network design model that allows properly allocating the resources of the bike-shared mobility service could improve the potential of crowdshipping, making it a viable support and supplement for the local postal services, and more easily accepted and adopted in urban contexts. An application to a case study has been embodied to show the effectiveness and advantages of our proposal.

[1]  Márcio de Almeida D'Agosto,et al.  Sustainable vehicles-based alternatives in last mile distribution of urban freight transport: A Systematic literature review , 2017 .

[2]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Free-floating bike sharing: Solving real-life large-scale static rebalancing problems , 2017 .

[3]  Sheng Liu,et al.  Shared Mobility for Last-Mile Delivery: Design, Operational Prescriptions, and Environmental Impact , 2018, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[4]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Comparing Car-Sharing Schemes in Switzerland: User Groups and Usage Patterns , 2017 .

[5]  Michela Le Pira,et al.  Connected shared mobility for passengers and freight: Investigating the potential of crowdshipping in urban areas , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[6]  Wenyi Chen,et al.  Multi-hop driver-parcel matching problem with time windows , 2018 .

[7]  C. Macharis,et al.  Crowd logistics: an opportunity for more sustainable urban freight transport? , 2017, European Transport Research Review.

[8]  Karan Girotra,et al.  Bike-Share Systems: Accessibility and Availability , 2018, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Catherine Cleophas,et al.  Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Thierry Vanelslander,et al.  The use of bicycle messengers in the logistics chain, concepts further revised , 2012 .

[11]  Patrícia Baptista,et al.  Comparing the Use of Small Sized Electric Vehicles with Diesel Vans on City Logistics , 2014 .

[12]  A Review Methodology of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: Objectives and Actions to Promote Cycling and Pedestrian Mobility , 2017 .

[13]  Valentina Carbone,et al.  The Rise of Crowd Logistics: A New Way to Co‐Create Logistics Value , 2017 .

[14]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Shipping outside the box. Environmental impact and stakeholder analysis of a crowd logistics platform in Belgium , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[15]  S. Melo,et al.  Evaluating the impacts of using cargo cycles on urban logistics: integrating traffic, environmental and operational boundaries , 2017, European Transport Research Review.

[16]  Leo G. Kroon,et al.  Crowdsourced Delivery - A Dynamic Pickup and Delivery Problem with Ad Hoc Drivers , 2016, Transp. Sci..

[17]  Stefan Voß,et al.  Increasing Acceptance of Free-Floating Car Sharing Systems Using Smart Relocation Strategies: A Survey Based Study of car2go Hamburg , 2014, ICCL.

[18]  Alireza Ermagun,et al.  To bid or not to bid: An empirical study of the supply determinants of crowd-shipping , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[19]  Bo Zou,et al.  Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery , 2017 .

[20]  Mingyang Du,et al.  Better Understanding the Characteristics and Influential Factors of Different Travel Patterns in Free-Floating Bike Sharing: Evidence from Nanjing, China , 2018 .

[21]  Alexander Kihm,et al.  Reject or Embrace? Messengers and Electric Cargo Bikes , 2016 .

[22]  Alireza Ermagun,et al.  Studying determinants of crowd-shipping use , 2018, Travel Behaviour and Society.

[23]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  Cyclist Satisfaction Evaluation Model for Free-Floating Bike-Sharing System: A Case Study of Shanghai , 2018 .

[24]  Susanne Wrighton,et al.  CycleLogistics – Moving Europe Forward! , 2016 .

[25]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members , 2015 .

[26]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Who are Bicyclists? Why and how much are they Bicycling? , 2009 .

[27]  Klaus Bogenberger,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Munich’s Free-Floating Bike Sharing System: GPS-Booking Data and Customer Survey among Bikesharing Users , 2015 .

[28]  Martin W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  The Vehicle Routing Problem with Occasional Drivers , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara,et al.  Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Chao Chen,et al.  Using the Crowd of Taxis to Last Mile Delivery in E-Commerce: a methodological research , 2015, SOHOMA.

[31]  W. Y. Szeto,et al.  A modeling framework for the dynamic management of free-floating bike-sharing systems , 2018 .

[32]  M. Gallo,et al.  Application of wireless sensor networks to environmental monitoring for sustainable mobility , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environmental Engineering (EE).

[33]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Transport reduction by crowdsourced deliveries – a library case in Finland , 2016 .