A new numerical solution to traditional phytosociological tabular classification

Often, manually and numerically derived phytosociological classifications yield different results. Hitherto, a twostep procedure has been suggested in which numerical analysis of the data is followed by the revision of the resulting table (cf. van der Maarel 1982). In this paper a new methodology is presented which makes manual refinements superfluous. Objectives are derived from phytosociological paradigms and conclusions drawn for the analytical process. The problems to be solved are: data transformation, detection of outliers, selection of clustering methods, checking within-group diversity, analysis of the resulting group structure, rearrangement of releves and species within the groups, and finally the selection of differential species. The method has been derived using the well known example of Ellenberg (Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg 1974). The results almost perfectly reproduce the intuitively widely accepted manual refinements in structure and presentation. A test with plant sociological data from Swiss forests (Ellenberg & Klotzli 1972) proves that the method can also classify complex gradient- and group systems and that the numerical result matches Landolt’s (1977) system of indicator values. Since the solutions can be exactly reproduced, it is no longer necessary to combine numerical analysis with additional editing.

[1]  László Orlóci,et al.  Multivariate Analysis in Vegetation Research , 1975 .

[2]  László Orlóci,et al.  Applying Metric and Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling to Ecological Studies: Some New Results , 1986 .

[3]  G. Grabherr.  Numerische Klassifikation und Ordination in der alpinen Vegetationsökologie als Beitrag zur Verknüpfung moderner «Computermethoden» mit der pflanzensoziologischen Tradition , 1985 .

[4]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Multivariate analysis in community ecology , 1984 .

[5]  M. Hill.  Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method , 1974 .

[6]  M. Hill,et al.  Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique , 1980 .

[7]  TABORD, a program for structuring phytosociological tables , 1978 .

[8]  Robert C. Jancey,et al.  Species ordering on a variance criterion , 1979, Vegetatio.

[9]  H. Ellenberg,et al.  Waldgesellschaften und Waldstandorte der Schweiz , 1972 .

[10]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[11]  László Orlóci,et al.  Analysis of concentration and detection of underlying factors in structured tables , 1979, Vegetatio.

[12]  E. van der Maarel,et al.  Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity , 1979, Vegetatio.

[13]  M. O. Hill,et al.  TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program of arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of individual and attributes , 1979 .

[14]  Peter R. Minchin,et al.  An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination , 1987 .

[15]  M. O. Hill,et al.  DECORANA - A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. , 1979 .

[16]  L. Orlóci,et al.  Management and multivariate analysis of vegetation data , 1983 .

[17]  M. E. D. Poore,et al.  The Use of Phytosociological Methods in Ecological Investigations: I. The Braun-Blanquet System , 1955 .

[18]  VEGTAB, ein Computer-Programm als Hilfe zur tabellarischen Vegetationsgliederung , 1983 .

[19]  J. Braun-Blanquet,et al.  Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzuge der Vegetationskunde. , 1967 .