Soft tissue effects of three different Class II/1-camouflage treatment strategies

[1]  Shannon Hilgers Nissen.  The Pendulum Appliance for Class II Non-Compliance Therapy. , 2017, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[2]  M. Cozzani,et al.  Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy using pendulum and distal screw appliances , 2015, Korean journal of orthodontics.

[3]  Pei-lun Li,et al.  [Soft tissue linear evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance treatment and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion]. , 2015, Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology.

[4]  H. Pancherz,et al.  Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance , 2014, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie.

[5]  L. Franchi,et al.  Active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue resistant device during comprehensive Class II correction in growing patients , 2014, Korean journal of orthodontics.

[6]  Yuxing Bai,et al.  An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects. , 2014, Australian orthodontic journal.

[7]  L. Franchi,et al.  Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: A controlled clinical study. , 2014, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  G. Singh,et al.  Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients , 2013, Contemporary clinical dentistry.

[9]  E. Bronkhorst,et al.  Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison , 2013, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[10]  Yuxing Bai,et al.  Treatment of a Class II Division 1 malocclusion with miniscrew anchorage. , 2012, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  L. Franchi,et al.  Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in Class II patients. , 2011, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  J. McNamara,et al.  Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  Seniz Karacay,et al.  Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[14]  P. Major,et al.  Soft tissue changes with fixed functional appliances in Class II division 1. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[15]  M. Woods,et al.  Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar class II cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[16]  J A McNamara,et al.  Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[17]  L. Franchi,et al.  Editor's Summary and Q&A: Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: A double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty , 2009 .

[18]  J. Lisson,et al.  The Effect of Premolar Extractions on Incisor Position and Soft Tissue Profile in Patients with Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion* , 2009, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[19]  T. Southard,et al.  Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[20]  G. Janson,et al.  Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  M. Woods,et al.  Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[22]  H. Pancherz,et al.  Herbst treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types. , 2006, The Angle orthodontist.

[23]  Ş. Karaçay,et al.  Dynamic MRI evaluation of tongue posture and deglutitive movements in a surgically corrected open bite. , 2006, Angle Orthodontist.

[24]  M. Almeida,et al.  Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[25]  R. G. Alexander,et al.  Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  J. McNamara,et al.  A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[27]  T. Takano-Yamamoto,et al.  Skeletal Class III oligodontia patient treated with titanium screw anchorage and orthognathic surgery. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[28]  J. McNamara,et al.  Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[29]  F. A. Başçiftçi,et al.  Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects. , 2003, The Angle orthodontist.

[30]  J A McNamara,et al.  Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[31]  J Artun,et al.  Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions. , 2000, The Angle orthodontist.

[32]  J. McNamara,et al.  Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[33]  R. T. Lee,et al.  A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[34]  R. Nanda,et al.  Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[35]  Hilgers Jj,et al.  The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. , 1992 .

[36]  S. Coben.  The biology of Class II treatment. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.

[37]  H. Pancherz,et al.  Facial Profile and Lip Position Changes in Adult Class II, Division 2 Subjects Treated with the Herbst-Multi bracket Appliance. A Radiographic Cephalometric Pilot Study , 2009, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[38]  G. Kinzinger,et al.  Class II Treatment in Adults: Comparing Camouflage Orthodontics, Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthognathic Surgery – A Cephalometric Study to Evaluate Various Therapeutic Effects* , 2009, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.