Technology–industry networks in technology commercialization: evidence from Korean university patents

[1]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Revised and Expanded Edition for Updated Software , 2018 .

[2]  Chuanli Wang,et al.  International scientific collaboration of China: collaborating countries, institutions and individuals , 2012, Scientometrics.

[3]  F. Sole.  What is an entrepreneurial university , 2013 .

[4]  Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas,et al.  University-Industry Collaboration and Innovation in Emergent and Mature Industries in New Industrialized Countries , 2013 .

[5]  D. Lee,et al.  Collaboration network patterns and research performance: the case of Korean public research institutions , 2012, Scientometrics.

[6]  Xianwen Wang,et al.  Science funding and research output: a study on 10 countries , 2012, Scientometrics.

[7]  Hsin-Yu Shih,et al.  Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997–2008 , 2011, Scientometrics.

[8]  D. Czarnitzki,et al.  Innovation Subsidies: Does the Funding Source Matter for Innovation Intensity and Performance? Empirical Evidence from Germany , 2011 .

[9]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  Do co-publications with industry lead to higher levels of university technology commercialization activity? , 2011, First International Technology Management Conference.

[10]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Evolutionary optimization of a technological knowledge network , 2010 .

[11]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  University patenting activities and their link to the quantity and quality of scientific publications , 2010, Scientometrics.

[12]  E Ray Dorsey,et al.  Funding of US biomedical research, 2003-2008. , 2010, JAMA.

[13]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives , 2009, 0912.3100.

[14]  D. Czarnitzki,et al.  Why Challenge the Ivory Tower? New Evidence on the Basicness of Academic Patents* , 2009 .

[15]  Valeria Arza,et al.  What drives the formation of ‘valuable’ university–industry linkages?: Insights from the wine industry , 2009 .

[16]  C. Phelps.  A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation , 2009 .

[17]  S. Sedita,et al.  How Do Collaborations with Universities Affect Firms' Innovative Performance? The Role of "Pasteur Scientists" in the Advanced Materials Field , 2009 .

[18]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach , 2009 .

[19]  Einar Rasmussen,et al.  Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research: Lessons from Canada , 2008 .

[20]  Rahul C. Basole.  Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem , 2008, 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business.

[21]  Kira Fabrizio,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment , 2008 .

[22]  Nicola Baldini,et al.  Negative effects of university patenting: Myths and grounded evidence , 2008, Scientometrics.

[23]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The incubation of innovation , 2008 .

[24]  M. Wright,et al.  Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications , 2007 .

[25]  Anne W. Fuller,et al.  Us Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University , 2007 .

[26]  T. Daim,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer , 2007 .

[27]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Journal gatekeepers indicator-based top universities of the world, of Europe and of 29 countries — A pilot study , 2007, Scientometrics.

[28]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Identifying sets of key players in a social network , 2006, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[29]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge , 2006 .

[30]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Universities in National Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[31]  B. Dousset.  Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry , 2005 .

[32]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  The idiosyncrasy and dynamism of technological innovation across industries: patent citation analysis , 2005 .

[33]  Antoni Calvó-Armengol,et al.  Centre De Referència En Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper Nº 178 Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Barcelona Economics Wp Nº 178 , 2022 .

[34]  Joshua B. Powers,et al.  University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms that Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[35]  Y.T. Park,et al.  On the linkage between industries and technologies: patent citation analysis , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574).

[36]  Dominique Guellec,et al.  From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter? , 2004 .

[37]  Joshua B. Powers.  R&D Funding Sources and University Technology Transfer: What Is Stimulating Universities to Be More Entrepreneurial? , 2004 .

[38]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors , 2003, Scientometrics.

[39]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Patent information for strategic technology management , 2003 .

[40]  P. Patel,et al.  University-industry research collaborations in the UK: Bibliometric trends , 2003 .

[41]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[42]  P. Sanyal.  Understanding patents: The role Of R&D funding sources and the patent office , 2002 .

[43]  Daniel K. N. Johnson.  The OECD Technology Concordance (OTC): Patents by Industry of Manufacture and Sector of Use , 2002 .

[44]  Juan D. Rogers,et al.  Obstacles and opportunities in the application of network analysis to the evaluation of R&D , 2001 .

[45]  Robert H. Pitkethly.  Intellectual property strategy in Japanese and UK companies: patent licensing decisions and learning opportunities , 2001 .

[46]  Manuel V. Heitor,et al.  UNIVERSITY-BASED TECHNOLOGY LICENSING IN THE KNOWLEDGE BASED ECONOMY , 1998 .

[47]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Assigning Patents to Industries: Tests of the Yale Technology Concordance , 1997 .

[48]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys , 1996 .

[49]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[50]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[51]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[52]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[53]  N. Nohria,et al.  Global strategic linkages and industry structure , 1991 .

[54]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs , 1989, Inf. Process. Lett..

[55]  Jason I Reminick,et al.  Funding of US Biomedical Research , 2011 .

[56]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Trajectory patterns of technology fusion: Trend analysis and taxonomical grouping in nanobiotechnology , 2010 .

[57]  F. Lissoni,et al.  University Research and Public–Private Interaction , 2010 .

[58]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  An ANP-based technology network for identification of core technologies: A case of telecommunication technologies , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[59]  Rahul C. Basole.  Structural Analysis and Visualization of Ecosystems: A Study of Mobile Device Platforms , 2009, AMCIS.

[60]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[61]  Diana Hicks,et al.  Does University-Industry Collaboration Adversely Affect University Research?. , 1999 .

[62]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence , 1997 .

[63]  D. Newbery,et al.  Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[64]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .