Amplification bandwidth and speech intelligibility for two listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

The intelligibility of speech as a function of its bandwidth was measured for two listeners with similar, moderately severe sensorineural hearing losses. The shape of the speech spectrum was adjusted to approximate the individual listener's contour of most comfortable listening levels (MCLs) and the overall level was set so that the levels in each band were below (-7 dB), near to (+3 dB), or above (+13 or +18 dB) the MCLs. At each level, nine pairings of three low-frequency and three high-frequency cutoffs (266, 375 and 530 Hz; 3,000, 4,242 and 6,000 Hz) were used. These conditions were achieved by passing the speech through a Limiting Master Hearing Aid (LMHA) which allows independent control of gain and maximum output in each of nine, half-octave bands. It was found that the wider the bandwidth, the higher the score, and the greater the amount of speech energy above threshold, the higher the score. Listeners' ability to understand the test material, after adjustment for listener differences, was correlated (0.7 and 0.8) with the articulation index.

[1]  M J Osberger,et al.  Discrimination of formant frequency transitions in synthetic vowels. , 1973, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  The selection of hearing AIDS , 1946, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  J L Punch,et al.  Low-frequency response of hearing aids and judgments of aided speech quality. , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[4]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  The selection of hearing aids Part II. , 1946 .

[5]  H. Fletcher,et al.  The Perception of Speech and Its Relation to Telephony , 1950 .

[6]  D. Pascoe,et al.  Frequency Responses of Hearing Aids and Their Effects on the Speech Perception of Hearing-Impaired Subjects , 1975 .

[7]  J. C. Steinberg,et al.  Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .

[8]  Ian B. Thomas,et al.  Effects of Spectral Weighting of Speech in Hearing-Impaired Subjects , 1974 .

[9]  D. Byrne,et al.  Selecting the Gain of Hearing Aids for Persons with Sensorineural Hearing Impairments , 1976 .

[10]  E. Harford,et al.  The use of high-pass amplification for broad-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[11]  M W Skinner,et al.  Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: effects of high-frequency compensation. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  B E Walden,et al.  Multidimensional scaling of quality judgments of speech signals processed by hearing aids. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  K. D. Kryter.  Methods for the Calculation and Use of the Articulation Index , 1962 .

[14]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  Correction to the International Standard Reference Zero for Pure-Tone Audiometers , 1965 .

[15]  J. D. Hood,et al.  Tolerable limit of loudness: its clinical and physiological significance. , 1966 .

[16]  C M Reed,et al.  Hearing aids--a review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression, and frequency lowering. , 1979, ASHA monographs.

[17]  Arnold F. Heidbreder.  Calibration of earphones on a flat‐plate coupler: Exploring two setup procedures , 1981 .

[18]  J M Pickett,et al.  Sensorineural hearing loss and upward spread of masking. , 1970, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  I Shapiro,et al.  Hearing aid fitting by prescription. , 1976, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[20]  R K Surr,et al.  Performance of high frequency impaired listeners with conventional and extended high frequency amplification. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.