Refer-to-as Relations as Semantic Knowledge

We study Refer-to-as relations as a new type of semantic knowledge. Compared to the much studied Is-a relation, which concerns factual taxonomic knowledge, Refer-to-as relations aim to address pragmatic semantic knowledge. For example, a "penguin" is a "bird" from a taxonomic point of view, but people rarely refer to a "penguin" as a "bird" in vernacular use. This observation closely relates to the entry-level categorization studied in Psychology. We posit that Refer-to-as relations can be learned from data, and that both textual and visual information would be helpful in inferring the relations. By integrating existing lexical structure knowledge with language statistics and visual similarities, we formulate a collective inference approach to map all object names in an encyclopedia to commonly used names for each object. Our contributions include a new labeled data set, the collective inference and optimization approach, and the computed mappings and similarities.

[1]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[2]  Yejin Choi,et al.  From Large Scale Image Categorization to Entry-Level Categories , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[3]  David K. Smith Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 1994 .

[4]  Fei-Fei Li,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  David K. Smith Theory of Linear and Integer Programming , 1987 .

[6]  J R Saffran,et al.  The acquisition of language by children , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation , 2013, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[9]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[11]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Language, Speech, and Communication , 2006 .

[12]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[13]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  Learning Syntactic Patterns for Automatic Hypernym Discovery , 2004, NIPS.

[14]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[15]  George A. Miller,et al.  Using Corpus Statistics and WordNet Relations for Sense Identification , 1998, CL.

[16]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[17]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Computational complexity , 1993 .

[18]  Marti A. Hearst Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora , 1992, COLING.

[19]  Krzysztof Czuba,et al.  Answering What-Is Questions by Virtual Annotation , 2001, HLT.