Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards

Understanding how people interpret risks and choose actions based on their interpretations is vital to any strategy for disaster reduction. We review relevant literature with the aim of developing a conceptual framework to guide future research in this area. We stress that risks in the context of natural hazards always involve interactions between natural (physical) and human (behavioural) factors. Decision-making under conditions of uncertainty is inadequately described by traditional models of 'rational choice'. Instead, attention needs to be paid to how people's interpretations of risks are shaped by their own experience, personal feelings and values, cultural beliefs and interpersonal and societal dynamics. Furthermore, access to information and capacity for self-protection are typically distributed unevenly within populations. Hence trust is a critical moderator of the effectiveness of any policy for risk communication and public engagement.

[1]  I. Erev,et al.  Small feedback‐based decisions and their limited correspondence to description‐based decisions , 2003 .

[2]  J Richard Eiser,et al.  Predicting Greek adolescents' intentions to smoke: a focus on normative processes. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[3]  J. Eiser,et al.  Smoking as a subjectively rational choice. , 1977, Addictive behaviors.

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Representations of perceptions of risks , 1984 .

[5]  A. Bostrom.  Risk Perception: “Experts” vs. “Lay People” , 1997 .

[6]  Alan F. Hamlet,et al.  PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGIONAL ASSESSMENT: THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE ON THE WATER RESOURCES OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN 1 , 2000 .

[7]  Douglas Paton,et al.  Adaptive and Growth Outcomes Following Tsunami: The Experience of Thai Communities following the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami , 2009 .

[8]  Kevin M. Simmons,et al.  False Alarms, Tornado Warnings, and Tornado Casualties , 2009 .

[9]  G. Gigerenzer.  Reckoning with Risk : Learning to Live with Uncertainty , 2002 .

[10]  Teun Terpstra,et al.  Emotions, Trust, and Perceived Risk: Affective and Cognitive Routes to Flood Preparedness Behavior , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Wout Slob,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Calculating Confidence Intervals for the Benchmark Dose , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  A. Oliver‐Smith,et al.  The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective , 1999 .

[13]  Mathew P White,et al.  The Importance of Multiple Performance Criteria for Understanding Trust in Risk Managers , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The Distortion of Information during Decisions , 1996 .

[15]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking , 2007 .

[16]  Lindsey R. Barnes,et al.  A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters , 2008 .

[17]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  Degrees of uncertainty: An overview and framework for future research on experience‐based choice , 2010 .

[18]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  J Richard Eiser,et al.  Attitude formation through exploration: valence asymmetries. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Patricia G. Lindemann,et al.  From intuition to analysis: Making decisions with your head, your heart, or by the book , 2011 .

[21]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risk and benefits’, Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, . , 2000 .

[22]  T. Grothmann,et al.  People at Risk of Flooding: Why Some Residents Take Precautionary Action While Others Do Not , 2006 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[24]  J. Darley,et al.  Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. , 1980 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[26]  John McClure,et al.  When Earthquake Damage is Seen as Preventable: Attributions, Locus of Control and Attitudes to Risk , 1999 .

[27]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  The acquaintance process as a prototype of human interaction. , 1961 .

[28]  D. Mileti.  Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States , 1999 .

[29]  Fausto Guzzetti,et al.  Use of GIS Technology in the Prediction and Monitoring of Landslide Hazard , 1999 .

[30]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Estimates of Their Personal Risk of Cancer and of the Incremental Risk Attributable to Cigarette Smoking1 , 1995 .

[31]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory , 2003 .

[32]  Peter Salovey,et al.  The Systematic Influence of Gain-and Loss-Framed Messages on Interest in and Use of Different Types of Health Behavior , 1999 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[34]  Kenneth Hewitt,et al.  Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters , 1997 .

[35]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Message framing and sunscreen use: gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[36]  S. Ormerod,et al.  The environment as hazard: (2nd edn). By I. Burton, R. W. Kates & G. F. White. Guildford Press, New York, 1993, ISBN 0-89862-159-3, 290 pp. Price: £16.99 , 1995 .

[37]  Sarah McCaffrey.  Thinking of Wildfire as a Natural Hazard , 2004 .

[38]  D. Ball.  Regions of Risk: a Geographical Introduction to Disasters , 1998 .

[39]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[41]  J. Swets.  The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology , 1973, Science.

[42]  D. Paton.  Disaster resilience: Integrating individual, community, institutional, and environmental perspectives , 2006 .

[43]  Joern Birkmann,et al.  Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: towards disaster resilient societies , 2007 .

[44]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Variations in value orientations. , 1961 .

[45]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[46]  J. Eiser,et al.  Marginal Trust in Risk Managers: Building and Losing Trust Following Decisions Under Uncertainty , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[47]  D. Bernoulli.  Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk , 1954 .

[48]  Chris G. Sibley,et al.  Listening to Reporters or Engineers? How Instance-Based Messages About Building Design Affect Earthquake Fatalism , 2007 .

[49]  B. Johnson.  Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach , 2002 .

[50]  A. Kimball Romney,et al.  Variations in value orientations. , 1961 .

[51]  E. Weber.  Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming does not Scare us (Yet) , 2006 .

[52]  Ilan Kelman,et al.  Places, people and perpetuity: Community capacities in ecologies of catastrophe , 2010 .

[53]  Douglas Paton,et al.  Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation: how trust influences its effectiveness , 2008 .

[54]  John McClure,et al.  Optimistic bias in relation to preparedness for earthquakes , 2005 .

[55]  Douglas Paton,et al.  Developing effective warning systems : Ongoing research at Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand , 2008 .

[56]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[57]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[58]  Heather Lazrus,et al.  Use of traditional knowledge in emergency management for tsunami hazard: A case study from Washington State, USA , 2008 .

[59]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.

[60]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Variations in value orientations. , 1961 .

[61]  D. Mileti,et al.  The social psychology of public response to warnings of a nuclear power plant accident. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[62]  D. Humphries,et al.  Reckoning with risk: learning to live with uncertainty , 2003, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[63]  N. Weinstein.  Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[64]  T. Earle,et al.  Thinking Aloud about Trust: A Protocol Analysis of Trust in Risk Management , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[65]  I. Burton.  VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTIVE RESPONSE IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE AND CLIMATE CHANGE , 1997 .

[66]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[67]  R. Meertens,et al.  Priorities in Information Desire about Unknown Risks , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[68]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[69]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  COMMUNICATING RISK TO THE PUBLIC , 1992 .

[70]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  Heiderian balance as a group phenomenon. , 1981 .

[71]  L. Pearce.  Disaster Management and Community Planning, and Public Participation: How to Achieve Sustainable Hazard Mitigation , 2003 .

[72]  M. J. Quadrel,et al.  Risk perception and communication , 2008 .

[73]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[74]  John McClure,et al.  Countering Fatalism: Causal Information in News Reports Affects Judgments About Earthquake Damage , 2001 .

[75]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Belief and Values in the Nuclear Debate1 , 1979 .

[76]  Chris G. Sibley,et al.  Framing effects on preparation intentions: distinguishing actions and outcomes , 2009 .

[77]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[79]  David Etkin,et al.  Risk transference and related trends: driving forces towards more mega-disasters , 1999 .

[80]  Norio Okada,et al.  Making sense of natural hazard mitigation: Personal, social and cultural influences , 2010 .

[81]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Trust, the Asymmetry Principle, and the Role of Prior Beliefs , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[82]  T. Newcomb.  The acquaintance process , 1961 .

[83]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  Communication of Emergency Public Warnings: A Social Science Perspective and State-of-the-Art Assessment , 1990 .

[84]  R P Barke,et al.  Politics and scientific expertise: scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy. , 1993, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[85]  C. Sunstein,et al.  Misfearing: A Reply , 2006 .

[86]  James P. Lewis,et al.  The vulnerability of small island States to sea level rise: the need for holistic strategies. , 1990, Disasters.

[87]  K. Witte.  Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM) , 1994 .