Jetstream 31 national flying laboratory: Lift and drag measurement and modelling

Abstract Lift and drag flight test data is presented from the National Flying Laboratory Centre, Jetstream 31 aircraft. The aircraft has been modified as a flying classroom for completing flight test training courses, for engineering degree accreditation. The straight and level flight test data is compared to data from 10% and 17% scale wind tunnel models, a Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes steady-state computational fluid dynamics model and an empirical model. Estimated standard errors in the flight test data are ± 2.4 % in lift coefficient, ± 2.7 % in drag coefficient. The flight test data also shows the aircraft to have a maximum lift to drag ratio of 10.5 at Mach 0.32, a zero lift drag coefficient of 0.0376 and an induced drag correction factor of 0.0607. When comparing the characteristics from the other models, the best overall comparison with the flight test data, in terms of lift coefficient, was with the empirical model. For the drag comparisons, all the models under predicted levels of drag by up to 43% when compared to the flight test data, with the best overall match between the flight test data and the 10% scale wind tunnel model. These discrepancies were attributed to various factors including zero lift drag Reynolds number effects, omission of a propeller system and surface excrescences on the models, as well as surface finish differences.

[1]  Belur Raghavan Rakshith,et al.  Optimal Low-Drag Wing Planforms for Tractor-Configuration Propeller-Driven Aircraft , 2015 .

[2]  Eastman N. Jacobs,et al.  Airfoil section characteristics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number , 1939 .

[3]  L. E. Wallace,et al.  Airborne Trailblazer: Two decades with NASA Langley's 737 flying laboratory , 1994 .

[4]  Steven A. Orszag,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of Complex Engineering and Geophysical Flows , 2010 .

[5]  Samuel R. Pate.  Effects of Wind Tunnel Disturbances on Boundary-Layer Transition with Emphasis on Radiated Noise: A Review , 1980 .

[6]  A. W. Burner,et al.  Aeroelastic Deformation: Adaptation of Wind Tunnel Measurement Concepts to Full-Scale Vehicle Flight Testing , 2013 .

[7]  Clifford J. Obara,et al.  Flight-measured streamwise disturbance instabilities in laminar flow , 1990 .

[8]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[9]  M. P. Fink,et al.  Aerodynamic data on a large semispan tilting wing with a 0.5-diameter chord, a single slotted flap and both left-hand and right-hand rotation of a single propeller , 1966 .

[10]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[11]  Darrol Stinton,et al.  Flying qualities and flight testing of the airplane , 1996 .

[12]  Marc E. Brenckmann,et al.  Experimental investigation of the aerodynamics of a wing in a slipstream , 1957 .

[13]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Summary of Data from the Fifth Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop , 2014 .

[14]  C. Edward Lan,et al.  Airplane Aerodynamics and Performance , 2016 .

[15]  Guy Gratton.  Initial Airworthiness: Determining the Acceptability of New Airborne Systems , 2014 .

[16]  Jürgen Kompenhans,et al.  ADVANCED IN-FLIGHT MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES , 2013 .

[17]  Stefan V. Baumgartner,et al.  5.5 - Usability of LTE for Transmitting Radar Data from DLR’s Research Aircraft DO 228-212 , 2016 .

[18]  Fritz Boden,et al.  IPCT Wing Deformation Measurements on a Large Transport Aircraft , 2013 .

[19]  J. Reneaux,et al.  OVERVIEW ON DRAG REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVIL TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT , 2004 .

[20]  Alastair K. Cooke,et al.  Simulation model of the NFLC Jetstream 31 , 2006 .

[21]  Kasim Biber.  Estimating Propeller Slipstream Drag on Airplane Performance , 2011 .

[22]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Topics in Detached-Eddy Simulation , 2006 .

[23]  Morteza Gharib,et al.  Perspective: The Experimentalist and the Problem of Turbulence in the Age of Supercomputers , 1996 .

[24]  J. A. Lawford,et al.  AGARD Flight Test Techniques Series. Volume 1. Calibration of Air-Data Systems and Flow Direction Sensors , 1983 .

[25]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .

[26]  E. V. Laitone.  Lift-curve slope for finite-aspect-ratio wings , 1989 .

[27]  Antony Jameson,et al.  50 years of transonic aircraft design , 2011 .

[28]  Michael S. Wusk.  ARIES: NASA Langley's Airborne Research Facility , 2002 .

[29]  Wolfgang Nitsche,et al.  Sensors and Actuators for Laminar Flow Flight Experiments , 2013 .

[30]  J. Anderson,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics : the basics with applications , 1995 .

[31]  Fernando Martini Catalano.  On the Effects of an Installed Propeller Slipstream on Wing Aerodynamic Characteristics , 2004 .

[32]  H. Bothe,et al.  Introduction to Flight Test Engineering. , 1995 .