Abstract This paper deals with the validation of the multifield computational fluid dynamics code NEPTUNE_CFD v2.0.1 against experimental data available from the OECD/NRC NUPEC PWR subchannel and bundle tests (PSBT) international benchmark. The present work is performed in the framework of the NURESAFE European collaborative project and focuses on the steady-state single subchannel void fraction tests. From overall 126 PSBT experiments covering wide range of test conditions and 4 different geometrical configurations of PWR subchannel, 42 tests have been selected and simulated using NEPTUNE_CFD. Following the NEA/CSNI (Nuclear Energy Agency/Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations) best practice guidelines about computational grid design and grid quality, mesh sensitivity analysis has been performed using axial and radial grid refinement. Both axial and radial mesh sensitivity studies do not exhibit any significant change in the predicted results, which thus result to be grid-converged. Besides, a series of sensitivity calculations have been performed in order to investigate the influence of uncertainties of the experimental boundary conditions on the code predictions. The influence of code physical and closure models on the void fraction prediction has been studied and discussed in detail. Generally, the calculated cross-sectional averaged void fraction at the measurement plane differs from the measured one by maximum of ±8%. This discrepancy is comparable to the 2σ experimental uncertainty range on void fraction measurement. The performed investigations have shown the ability of NEPTUNE_CFD to predict reasonably the void fraction in PSBT subchannel using appropriate modeling.
[1]
B. Launder,et al.
The numerical computation of turbulent flows
,
1990
.
[2]
Hidesada Tamai,et al.
Transverse migration of single bubbles in simple shear flows
,
2002
.
[3]
Robert Stieglitz,et al.
Validation of NEPTUNE-CFD Two-Phase Flow Models Using Experimental Data
,
2014
.
[4]
Wei Yao,et al.
Volumetric interfacial area prediction in upward bubbly two-phase flow
,
2004
.
[5]
Michael Z. Podowski,et al.
MULTIDIMENSIONAL EFFECTS IN FORCED CONVECTION SUBCOOLED BOILING
,
1990
.
[6]
N. Zuber,et al.
Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows
,
1979
.
[7]
N. Zuber.
ON THE DISPERSED TWO-PHASE FLOW IN THE LAMINAR FLOW REGIME.
,
1964
.
[8]
M. Boucker,et al.
A second order turbulence model based on a Reynolds stress approach for two-phase boiling flow. Part 1: Application to the ASU-annular channel case
,
2010
.
[9]
Antoine Guelfi,et al.
NEPTUNE: A New Software Platform for Advanced Nuclear Thermal Hydraulics
,
2007
.
[10]
M. Boucker,et al.
Numerical Study of the Steady-State Subchannel Test-Case with NEPTUNE_CFD for the OECD/NRC NUPEC PSBT Benchmark
,
2012
.
[11]
M. Guingo,et al.
A Generalized turbulent dispersion model for bubbly flow numerical simulation in NEPTUNE_CFD
,
2017
.