Estimation of Hail Damage Using Crop Models and Remote Sensing

Insurance agents often provide crop hail damage estimates based on their personal experience and field samples, which are not always representative of the investigated field’s spatial variability. For these reasons, farmers and the insurance market ask for a reliable, objective, and less labor-intensive method to determine crop hail losses. Integrating remote sensing and crop modeling provides a unique opportunity for the crop insurance market for a reliable, objective, and less labor-intensive method to estimate hail damage. To this end, a study was conducted on eight distinct maize fields for a total of 90 hectares. Five fields were damaged by the hailstorm that occurred on 13 July 2019 and three were not damaged. Soil and plant samples were collected to characterize the experimental areas. The Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL) was deployed to determine the total aboveground biomass and obtainable yield at harvest, using Landsat 7 and 8 satellite images. Modeled hail damages (HDDSSAT1, coupling SEBAL estimates of obtainable yield and DSSAT-based potential yield; HDDSSAT2, coupling yield map at harvest and the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT)-based potential yield) were calculated and compared to the estimates of the insurance company (HDinsurance). SEBAL-based biomass and yield estimates agreed with in-season measurements (−4% and +0.5%, respectively). While some under and overestimations were observed, HDinsurance and HDDSSAT1 averaged similar values (−4.9% and +3.4%) compared to the reference approach (HDDSSAT2).

[1]  Marco Martello,et al.  Integrating SEBAL with in-Field Crop Water Status Measurement for Precision Irrigation Applications - A Case Study , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[3]  M. Baldi,et al.  Hail occurrence in Italy: Towards a national database and climatology , 2014 .

[4]  Stanley A. Changnon,et al.  Increasing major hail losses in the U.S. , 2009 .

[5]  R. Blong,et al.  A hail climatology of the greater Sydney area and New South Wales, Australia , 2005 .

[6]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Spatiotemporal Response of Maize Yield to Edaphic and Meteorological Conditions in a Saline Farmland , 2014 .

[7]  Albert J. Peters,et al.  Use of Remotely Sensed Data for Assessing Crop Hail Damage , 2000 .

[8]  Mónica Balzarini,et al.  Protocol for automating error removal from yield maps , 2019, Precision Agriculture.

[9]  K. Bedka,et al.  A new physically based stochastic event catalog for hail in Europe , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[10]  Wenjiang Huang,et al.  Detection and mapping of hail damage to corn using domestic remotely sensed data in China. , 2012 .

[11]  J. Eldredge The effect of injury in imitation of hail damage on the development of the corn plant , 1935 .

[12]  Yann H. Chemin,et al.  Mapping Maize Evapotranspiration at Field Scale Using SEBAL: A Comparison with the FAO Method and Soil-Plant Model Simulations , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Erda Wang,et al.  Simulation of hail effects on crop yield losses for corn-belt states in USA , 2012 .

[15]  W. Bastiaanssen,et al.  SEBAL for detecting spatial variation of water productivity and scope for improvement in eight irrigated wheat systems , 2007 .

[16]  A. D. Flowerday,et al.  Yield Loss Due to Simulated Hail Damage on Corn: A Comparison of Actual and Predicted Values 1 , 1986 .

[17]  Jianfeng Zhou,et al.  Aerial multispectral imaging for crop hail damage assessment in potato , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[18]  Clement Atzberger,et al.  The Potential and Uptake of Remote Sensing in Insurance: A Review , 2014, Remote. Sens..