Stochastic Technology Choice Model for Consequential Life Cycle Assessment.

Discussions on Consequential Life Cycle Assessment (CLCA) have relied largely on partial or general equilibrium models. Such models are useful for integrating market effects into CLCA, but also have well-recognized limitations such as the poor granularity of the sectoral definition and the assumption of perfect oversight by all economic agents. Building on the Rectangular-Choice-of-Technology (RCOT) model, this study proposes a new modeling approach for CLCA, the Technology Choice Model (TCM). In this approach, the RCOT model is adapted for its use in CLCA and extended to incorporate parameter uncertainties and suboptimal decisions due to market imperfections and information asymmetry in a stochastic setting. In a case study on rice production, we demonstrate that the proposed approach allows modeling of complex production technology mixes and their expected environmental outcomes under uncertainty, at a high level of detail. Incorporating the effect of production constraints, uncertainty, and suboptimal decisions by economic agents significantly affects technology mixes and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the system under study. The case study also shows the model's ability to determine both the average and marginal environmental impacts of a product in response to changes in the quantity of final demand.

[1]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  J. M. Earles,et al.  Consequential life cycle assessment: a review , 2011 .

[3]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments , 1996 .

[4]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  A review of approaches to treat uncertainty in LCA , 2004 .

[5]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Consequential environmental system analysis of expected offshore wind electricity production in Germany , 2008 .

[6]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Optimal Corn Stover Logistics for Biofuel Production: A Case in Minnesota , 2011 .

[7]  K. Andersson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bread produced on different scales , 1999 .

[8]  Venkatesh Akella,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of smartphone reuse: repurposing vs. refurbishment , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Part II: Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment , 1998 .

[10]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  From laboratory to industrial scale: a scale-up framework for chemical processes in life cycle assessment studies , 2016 .

[11]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Lights and shadows in consequential LCA , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Yasuhiro Fukushima,et al.  Evaluation of GHG Emission Reduction Potentials of PV System Considering Power Mix Shifts , 2008 .

[13]  F. Duchin,et al.  Prospects for Cellulosic Biofuel Production in the Northeastern United States: A Scenario Analysis , 2016 .

[14]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants , 2000 .

[15]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis , 2008 .

[16]  Niklas von der Assen,et al.  Industry-Cost-Curve Approach for Modeling the Environmental Impact of Introducing New Technologies in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  P. Nielsen,et al.  Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption , 2008 .

[18]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  The Role of Scale and Technology Maturity in Life Cycle Assessment of Emerging Technologies: A Case Study on Carbon Nanotubes , 2015 .

[19]  Shelie A. Miller,et al.  Framework for analyzing transformative technologies in life cycle assessment. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  D. Rajagopal Consequential Life Cycle Assessment of Policy Vulnerability to Price Effects , 2014 .

[21]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  A Moonshot for Sustainability Assessment. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Joel Landry,et al.  Are There Carbon Savings from US Biofuel Policies? The Critical Importance of Accounting for Leakage in Land and Fuel Markets , 2012 .

[23]  Ivo Mersiowsky,et al.  LCA’s theory and practice: like ebony and ivory living in perfect harmony? , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[24]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Data quality , 1996 .

[25]  Alain Haurie,et al.  Application of three independent consequential LCA approaches to the agricultural sector in Luxembourg , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[26]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[27]  R. Samson,et al.  Assessing non-marginal variations with consequential LCA: Application to European energy sector , 2011 .

[28]  Krishna G. Palepu,et al.  Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature , 2000 .

[29]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption , 2007 .

[30]  Jannick H. Schmidt System delimitation in agricultural consequential LCA , 2008 .

[31]  G. Becker,et al.  Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory , 1962, Journal of Political Economy.

[32]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Placebo Effects of Marketing Actions: Consumers May Get What They Pay For , 2005 .

[33]  S. Suh,et al.  On the uncanny capabilities of consequential LCA , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[34]  Jean-Luc Chevalier,et al.  Life cycle analysis with ill-defined data and its application to building products , 1996 .

[35]  Richard Wood,et al.  A Methodology for Integrated, Multiregional Life Cycle Assessment Scenarios under Large-Scale Technological Change. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  A. Bardow,et al.  Sensitivity coefficient-based uncertainty analysis for multi-functionality in LCA , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[37]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments , 2009 .

[38]  S. Levine,et al.  SECTORS MAY USE MULTIPLE TECHNOLOGIES SIMULTANEOUSLY: THE RECTANGULAR CHOICE-OF-TECHNOLOGY MODEL WITH BINDING FACTOR CONSTRAINTS , 2011 .

[39]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Can the Predictions of Consequential Life Cycle Assessment Be Tested in the Real World? Comment on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation...” , 2014 .

[40]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[41]  Guido Sonnemann,et al.  Uncertainty assessment by a Monte Carlo simulation in a life cycle inventory of electricity produced by a waste incinerator , 2003 .

[42]  M. Karlström,et al.  Positive and negative feedback in consequential life-cycle assessment , 2007 .

[43]  F. Duchin,et al.  ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF POLICY RESTRICTIONS ON WATER WITHDRAWALS FROM SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND SOURCES , 2015 .

[44]  A. Marvuglia,et al.  Modelling approaches for consequential life-cycle assessment (C-LCA) of bioenergy: Critical review and proposed framework for biogas production , 2013 .

[45]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[46]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant-Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (9 pp + 3 pp) , 2005 .

[47]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production , 2008 .

[48]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers , 2014 .

[49]  A. Cowie,et al.  The Use of Life Cycle Assessment in the Support of Robust (Climate) Policy Making: Comment on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation …” , 2014 .

[50]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Structural Change and the Environment , 2012 .

[51]  Yu-Ming Kuo,et al.  Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollutant Emission Reduction Potentials of Renewable Energy—Case Studies on Photovoltaic and Wind Power Introduction Considering Interactions among Technologies in Taiwan , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[52]  J. M. Earles,et al.  Integrated Economic Equilibrium and Life Cycle Assessment Modeling for Policy‐based Consequential LCA , 2013 .

[53]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[54]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological–economic model , 2004 .