Identification and transfer of important factors for sustainability initiatives implementation

ABSTRACT Cardo is a large, multinational previously fragmented company with a history of completely separated management and decision processes (between the divisions), this has enabled as many different ways of choosing and implementing different initiatives as there are offices. The latest step in the change process was implemented during the spring of 2010, since then, Cardo consists of two divisions with the purpose of further unifying the divisions under the Cardo brand. The two new divisions are Cardo entrance solutions and Cardo flow solutions. Cardo mainly operates in the water and logistics area, two areas that because of the recent changes in the environmental focus among most companies have become of the highest importance for a future sustainable company as well as society. This fact shows that there is a huge business potential for the organization that manages to integrate the environmental work into their operations. Within the organization several sustainability initiatives have been implemented and Cardo wants to identify these initiatives in order to learn and evolve from them which hopefully will result in that Cardo will stand better prepared for all the upcoming sustainability initiatives. The purpose of this report is therefore to investigate previously implemented sustainability initiatives, mainly ones with an environmental and economical focus in order to identify the most important factors for the implementation of sustainability initiatives. The three investigated initiatives will all be analyzed separately from a series of theoretical areas. In the final chapter they are compared to each other in order to identify what was done in a good way and what needs to be improved. Based on the theory and the empirical findings from the investigated initiatives the most important areas in which a discussion is shown are kind of change, statement of direction, involvement, communication, motivation and leadership. These findings are all closely connected and affect each other to a great extent. Therefore it is important in to follow them from the very beginning of each new initiative. Keywords Change management, strategy, communication, knowledge transfer, situational leadership, motivation, sustainability

[1]  Julia Balogun,et al.  Exploring Strategic Change , 1998 .

[2]  Michael Beer,et al.  How to have an honest conversation about your business strategy. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[3]  A. Zaleznik.  Managers and Leaders Are They Different , 2004 .

[4]  F. Nicolò,et al.  Integration of benchmarking and benchmarking of integration , 1995 .

[5]  C. Cook,et al.  Management and Organizational Behavior , 1994 .

[6]  R. Grant.  Contemporary Strategy Analysis , 2005 .

[7]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The office of strategy management. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[8]  Victoria L. Crittenden,et al.  BUILDING A CAPABLE ORGANIZATION: THE EIGHT LEVERS OF STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION , 2008 .

[9]  M. Maehr.  Advances in Motivation and Achievement , 1991 .

[10]  R. J. House,et al.  The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis? , 1997 .

[11]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[12]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[13]  Michael C. Mankins,et al.  Turning great strategy into great performance. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[14]  M. Beer,et al.  The Silent Killers of Strategy Implementation and Learning , 2000 .

[15]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[16]  N. Nohria,et al.  Cracking the code of change. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[17]  B. Bergman,et al.  Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction , 1994 .

[18]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  Benchmarking For Best Practice , 1998 .

[19]  R. J. House,et al.  A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness , 1971 .

[20]  Mary K. Feeney,et al.  Toward a Useful Theory of Mentoring , 2007 .

[21]  Robert Blauner,et al.  Alienation and Freedom , 1965 .

[22]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[23]  J. Levine,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others☆ , 2000 .

[24]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test , 1994 .

[25]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[26]  C. Argyris.  On organizational learning , 1993 .

[27]  Christina Björklund,et al.  Work motivation studies of its determinants and outcomes , 2001 .

[28]  Yiannis Gabriel,et al.  Organizing and Organizations , 2005 .

[29]  E. Lawler,et al.  Behavior in Organizations , 1986 .

[30]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[31]  Connolly,et al.  Database Systems , 2004 .

[32]  Gareth R. Jones.  Organizational theory, design, and change / Gareth R. Jones. , 2006 .

[33]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[34]  K. Andrews.  The Concept of Corporate Strategy , 1971 .

[35]  Michael Burda,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1993 .

[36]  Benjamin Tregoe,et al.  Top management strategy , 1980 .

[37]  M. Porter.  What is strategy , 2000 .

[38]  G. Yukl.  Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research , 1989 .

[39]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[40]  Steve Bell.  Managing Knowledge for Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[41]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  The Impact of Participation on Goal Acceptance and Performance: A Two-Step Model , 1985 .

[42]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy , 1988 .