3D image registration is critical to ensure accurate detection of longitudinal changes in trabecular bone density, microstructure, and stiffness measurements in rat tibiae by in vivo microcomputed tomography (μCT).

In the recent decade, in vivo μCT scanners have become available to monitor temporal changes in rodent bone in response to diseases and treatments. We investigated short-term and long-term precision of in vivo μCT measurements of trabecular bone density, microstructure and stiffness of rat tibiae and tested whether they can be improved by 3D image registration. Rats in the short-term precision group underwent baseline and follow-up scans within the same day (n = 15) and those in the long-term precision group were scanned at day 0 and day 14 (n = 16) at 10.5 μm voxel size. A 3D image-registration scheme was applied to register the trabecular bone compartments of baseline and follow-up scans. Prior to image registration, short-term precision ranged between 0.85% and 2.65% in bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number, thickness, and spacing (Tb.N*, Tb.Th*, Tb.Sp*), trabecular bone mineral density and tissue mineral density (Tb.BMD, and Tb.TMD), and was particularly high in structure model index (SMI), connectivity density (Conn.D), and stiffness (4.29%-8.83%). Image registration tended to improve the short-term precision, but the only statistically significant improvement was in Tb.N*, Tb.TMD, and stiffness. On the other hand, unregistered comparisons between day-0 and day-14 scans suggested significant increases in BV/TV, Tb.N*, Tb.Th*, Conn.D, and Tb.BMD and decrease in Tb.Sp* and SMI. However, the percent change in each parameter from registered comparisons was significantly different from unregistered comparisons. Registered results suggested a significant increase in BV/TV, Tb.BMD, and stiffness over 14 days, primarily caused by increased Tb.Th* and Tb.TMD. Due to the continuous growth of rodents, the direct comparisons between the unregistered baseline and follow-up scans were driven by changes due to global bone modeling instead of local remodeling. Our results suggested that 3D image registration is critical for detecting changes due to bone remodeling activities in rodent trabecular bone by in vivo μCT imaging.

[1]  G. Niebur,et al.  Biomechanics of trabecular bone. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[2]  Zhiyong Gao,et al.  Monomodal image registration using mutual information based methods , 2008, Image Vis. Comput..

[3]  Jonathan S. Lewin,et al.  Semiautomatic 3-D image registration as applied to interventional MRI liver cancer treatment , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  S Tetradis,et al.  MicroCT morphometry analysis of mouse cancellous bone: intra- and inter-system reproducibility. , 2011, Bone.

[6]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Accuracy of high‐resolution in vivo micro magnetic resonance imaging for measurements of microstructural and mechanical properties of human distal tibial bone , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Assessment of cancellous bone mechanical properties from micro-FE models based on micro-CT, pQCT and MR images. , 1998, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[8]  Bert Van Rietbergen,et al.  Finite element analysis performed on radius and tibia HR-pQCT images and fragility fractures at all sites in postmenopausal women. , 2010, Bone.

[9]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Mouse tail vertebrae adapt to cyclic mechanical loading by increasing bone formation rate and decreasing bone resorption rate as shown by time-lapsed in vivo imaging of dynamic bone morphometry. , 2011, Bone.

[10]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Reproducibility of bone micro-architecture measurements in rodents by in vivo micro-computed tomography is maximized with three-dimensional image registration. , 2010, Bone.

[12]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Comparison of bone loss induced by ovariectomy and neurectomy in rats analyzed by in vivo micro‐CT , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  Luis Ibáñez,et al.  The ITK Software Guide , 2005 .

[15]  Ralph Müller,et al.  In vivo micro-computed tomography allows direct three-dimensional quantification of both bone formation and bone resorption parameters using time-lapsed imaging. , 2011, Bone.

[16]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Monitoring individual morphological changes over time in ovariectomized rats by in vivo micro-computed tomography. , 2006, Bone.

[17]  H Weinans,et al.  Detecting and tracking local changes in the tibiae of individual rats: a novel method to analyse longitudinal in vivo micro-CT data. , 2004, Bone.

[18]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Bone Degeneration and Recovery after Early and Late Bisphosphonate Treatment of Ovariectomized Wistar Rats Assessed by In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography , 2008, Calcified Tissue International.

[19]  H. Weinans,et al.  Bone loss dynamics result in trabecular alignment in aging and ovariectomized rats , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  C L Benhamou,et al.  Assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by two different x-ray microcomputed tomographs: a comparative study of the rat distal tibia using Skyscan and Scanco devices. , 2009, Medical physics.

[21]  S. K. Boyd,et al.  Signs of irreversible architectural changes occur early in the development of experimental osteoporosis as assessed by in vivo micro-CT , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Evaluation of Three-dimensional Image Registration Methodologies for In Vivo Micro-computed Tomography , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Guo X. Edward,et al.  Is Trabecular Bone Tissue Different from Cortical Bone Tissue , 1998 .

[24]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Postpubertal Architectural Developmental Patterns Differ Between the L3 Vertebra and Proximal Tibia in Three Inbred Strains of Mice , 2008, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Automated multi-moda lity image registration based on information theory , 1995 .

[26]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro–computed tomography , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  X. Guo,et al.  Abnormal Microarchitecture and Reduced Stiffness at the Radius and Tibia in Postmenopausal Women With Fractures , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[28]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory , 1995 .

[29]  Robyn A. Owens,et al.  Registration of stereo and temporal images of the retina , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Bone strength at the distal radius can be estimated from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and the finite element method. , 2008, Bone.

[31]  X. Guo,et al.  High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Can Assess Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Human Distal Tibial Bone , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[32]  David P Fyhrie,et al.  The effect of microcomputed tomography scanning and reconstruction voxel size on the accuracy of stereological measurements in human cancellous bone. , 2004, Bone.

[33]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  No effects of in vivo micro‐CT radiation on structural parameters and bone marrow cells in proximal tibia of wistar rats detected after eight weekly scans , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  G. H. van Lenthe,et al.  Assessing forearm fracture risk in postmenopausal women , 2010, Osteoporosis International.