Ecological drivers of dissimilarity in multidimensional plant composition of early‐stage plantations in a loess hilly‐gully region

Plant diversity is an important link between forest ecosystems' structural composition and functional processes. The simple composition of young plantations is weakening the ecological function of restored forest ecosystems in arid regions. The ecological drivers of the plant composition and dissimilarity in plantations remain unclear, especially in the early restoration stage. To fill the gap in knowledge of the differences in species composition in early restored ecosystems, and to reveal the influencing factors of similar species numbers with different compositional structures, based on species' presence‐absence, abundance, and conspicuousness, we explored dissimilarity in the plant composition of young plantations in the loess hilly‐gully region. Our results showed that differences in alpha diversity among plantations were minimal, while the differences in beta diversity were significant. Even if the species diversity of a plantation was low, communities with similar species richness used to have large dissimilarities in their species composition. Turnover components and balanced variation often contributed significantly to species compositional dissimilarity. Co‐inertia analysis results showed species conspicuousness had the greatest consistency with observed environmental variables (RV = 0.65). The redundancy analysis and generalized diversity modeling results showed differences between the drivers of species diversity and dissimilarity. The primary influencing factors for alpha diversity were: soil water content, soil texture, soil total phosphorus, and soil organic carbon. Primary influencing factors for dissimilarity (beta diversity) were: soil nitrogen to phosphorus ratio, breast‐height diameter, soil water content, and stand density. Collectively, plant taxa dissimilarity was influenced by soil nutrient ratio and community structure and plant taxa abundance was influenced by soil nutrient content. Our findings improve the understanding of the plantation species composition and facilitate the prediction of ecological functions.

[1]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Strong floristic distinctiveness across Neotropical successional forests , 2022, Science advances.

[2]  Philip Smith,et al.  The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches , 2022, Science.

[3]  Hairong Han,et al.  Network analysis reveals the regulatory effect of mixed stands on ecosystem structure and functions in the Loess Plateau, China. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Yue Wang,et al.  Driving factors of spatial turnover of plant species in Shennongjia , 2022, Biodiversity Science.

[5]  Susanne A. Fritz,et al.  Global plant‐frugivore trait matching is shaped by climate and biogeographic history , 2021, bioRxiv.

[6]  F. He,et al.  Phylogenetic dependence of plant–soil feedback promotes rare species in a subtropical forest , 2021, Journal of Ecology.

[7]  Guoyi Zhou,et al.  Plant diversity and species turnover co-regulate soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability in Dinghushan forests, southern China , 2021, Plant and Soil.

[8]  N. He,et al.  Divergent roles of environmental and spatial factors in shaping plant β-diversity of different growth forms in drylands , 2021 .

[9]  A. Chiarucci,et al.  Contrasting multitaxon responses to climate change in Mediterranean mountains , 2021, Scientific reports.

[10]  L. Epele,et al.  Ecological drivers of alpha and beta diversity of freshwater invertebrates in arid and semiarid Patagonia (Argentina). , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  M. Bazzichetto,et al.  Exploring the drivers of vascular plant richness at very fine spatial scale in sub-Mediterranean limestone grasslands (Central Apennines, Italy) , 2019, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[12]  F. Maestre,et al.  Phylogenetic, functional, and taxonomic richness have both positive and negative effects on ecosystem multifunctionality , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  O. Phillips,et al.  Dominant tree species drive beta diversity patterns in western Amazonia. , 2019, Ecology.

[14]  F. He,et al.  Environmental filtering explains a U-shape latitudinal pattern in regional β-deviation for eastern North American trees. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[15]  David Lamb,et al.  Undertaking large‐scale forest restoration to generate ecosystem services , 2018 .

[16]  M. Slezak,et al.  History and environment shape species pools and community diversity in European beech forests , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[17]  F. Moreira,et al.  Using beta diversity to inform agricultural policies and conservation actions on Mediterranean farmland , 2017 .

[18]  T. L. Dickson,et al.  Dispersal and neutral sampling mediate contingent effects of disturbance on plant beta-diversity: a meta-analysis. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[19]  Haldre S. Rogers,et al.  Leveraging nature's backup plans to incorporate interspecific interactions and resilience into restoration , 2016 .

[20]  D. Edwards,et al.  How Should Beta-Diversity Inform Biodiversity Conservation? , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  H. Epstein,et al.  Factors affecting the recovery of abandoned semi-arid fields after legume introduction on the Loess Plateau , 2015 .

[22]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Effects of species' similarity and dominance on the functional and phylogenetic structure of a plant meta-community. , 2015, Ecology.

[23]  A. Baselga.  Separating the two components of abundance‐based dissimilarity: balanced changes in abundance vs. abundance gradients , 2013 .

[24]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Beta-diversity in temperate and tropical forests reflects dissimilar mechanisms of community assembly. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[25]  A. Baselga.  The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness , 2012 .

[26]  David Kenfack,et al.  The variation of tree beta diversity across a global network of forest plots , 2012 .

[27]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change , 2012, Nature.

[28]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[29]  Mark Vellend,et al.  Conceptual Synthesis in Community Ecology , 2010, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[30]  A. Chao,et al.  Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses , 2010 .

[31]  A. Baselga.  Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity , 2010 .

[32]  D. Kelly,et al.  Ground flora communities in temperate oceanic plantation forests and the influence of silvicultural, geographic and edaphic factors , 2008 .

[33]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  J. Elith,et al.  Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment , 2007 .

[35]  Guillem Chust,et al.  Determinants and spatial modeling of tree β-diversity in a tropical forest landscape in Panama , 2006 .

[36]  B. Sanderson,et al.  A phytoplankton community in a temperate reservoir in New South Wales, Australia: relationships between similarity and diversity indices and measures of hydrological disturbance , 2005 .

[37]  Mark E. Jakubauskas,et al.  Beyond Species Richness: Community Similarity as a Measure of Cross‐Taxon Congruence for Coarse‐Filter Conservation , 2004 .

[38]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  CO‐INERTIA ANALYSIS AND THE LINKING OF ECOLOGICAL DATA TABLES , 2003 .