On participation in group chats on Twitter

The success of a group depends on continued participation of its members through time. We study the factors that affect continued user participation in the context of educational Twitter chats. To predict whether a user that attended her first session in a particular Twitter chat group will return to the group, we build 5F Model that captures five different factors: individual initiative, group characteristics, perceived receptivity, linguistic affinity and geographical proximity. Through statistical data analysis of thirty Twitter chats over a two year period as well as a survey study, our work provides many insights about group dynamics in Twitter chats. We show similarities between Twitter chats and traditional groups such as the importance of social inclusion and linguistic similarity while also identifying important distinctions such as the insignificance of geographical proximity. We also show that informational support is more important than emotional support in educational Twitter chats, but this does not reduce the sense of community as suggested in earlier studies.

[1]  Kristen Campbell Eichhorn,et al.  An Exploration of Why People Participate in Second Life Social Support Groups , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Electronic Groups at Work. , 1990 .

[3]  K. Williams,et al.  Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[5]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: a theoretical model and empirical exploration , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[6]  Jason Baldridge,et al.  Simple supervised document geolocation with geodesic grids , 2011, ACL.

[7]  Lauren E. Scissors,et al.  Language Style Matching Predicts Relationship Initiation and Stability , 2011, Psychological science.

[8]  Terrance L. Albrecht,et al.  Developing Communication Theories , 1997 .

[9]  Alexandros Ntoulas,et al.  Homophily in the Digital World: A LiveJournal Case Study , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.

[10]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007) , 2007 .

[11]  R. Sinnott Virtues of the Haversine , 1984 .

[12]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  The effect of being shunned upon the desire to affiliate , 1971 .

[13]  Anita L. Blanchard,et al.  Supportive communication, sense of virtual community and health outcomes in online infertility groups , 2009, C&T.

[14]  L. Doob The psychology of social norms. , 1937 .

[15]  John M. Levine,et al.  To stay or leave?: the relationship of emotional and informational support to commitment in online health support groups , 2012, CSCW.

[16]  Mark R. Leary,et al.  Responses to Social Exclusion: Social Anxiety, Jealousy, Loneliness, Depression, and Low Self-Esteem , 1990 .

[17]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[18]  DeNel Rehberg Sedo,et al.  Readers in Reading Groups , 2003 .

[19]  Munmun De Choudhury,et al.  What makes conversations interesting?: themes, participants and consequences of conversations in online social media , 2009, WWW '09.

[20]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  May,et al.  [Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics] Applied Survival Analysis (Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data) || Extensions of the Proportional Hazards Model , 2008 .

[22]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[23]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution , 2006, KDD '06.

[24]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Characterizing and curating conversation threads: expansion, focus, volume, re-entry , 2013, WSDM.

[25]  Calvin Meng Lai Chan,et al.  Recognition and participation in a virtual community , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[26]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Echoes of power: language effects and power differences in social interaction , 2011, WWW.

[27]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  User loyalty and online communities: why members of online communities are not faithful , 2008, INTETAIN '08.

[28]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Do all birds tweet the same?: characterizing twitter around the world , 2011, CIKM '11.

[29]  P. V. Rao,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data , 2000 .

[30]  ScienceDirect Human resource management review , 1991 .

[31]  F. H. Hankins,et al.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[32]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  The Anatomy of the Facebook Social Graph , 2011, ArXiv.

[33]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Predicting Continued Participation in Newsgroups , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data , 2008 .

[35]  J D SNOEK Some effects of rejection upon attraction to a group. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[36]  Christopher M. Johnson A survey of current research on online communities of practice , 2001, Internet High. Educ..

[37]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Persistence and lurkers in discussion lists: a pilot study , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[38]  Andrea Forte,et al.  Grassroots Professional Development: How Teachers Use Twitter , 2012, ICWSM.

[39]  R. Ziller,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF OPEN AND CLOSED GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Preferential behavior in online groups , 2008, WSDM '08.

[41]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Community Commitment: How Affect, Obligation, and Necessity Drive Online Behaviors , 2006, ICIS.

[42]  David A. Huffaker The impact of group attributes on communication activity and shared language in online communities , 2011, First Monday.

[43]  Michael Gamon,et al.  Predicting Responses to Microblog Posts , 2012, NAACL.

[44]  Amin Saberi,et al.  Exploring the community structure of newsgroups , 2004, KDD.

[45]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities , 2006, CHI.

[46]  J. Gillon,et al.  Group dynamics , 1996 .

[47]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  No country for old members: user lifecycle and linguistic change in online communities , 2013, WWW.

[49]  A. A. Felts Organizational Communication , 1992 .

[50]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .