A New Sample-Based Approach to Predict System Performance Reliability

Multiple degradation paths arise when systems operate under uncontrolled, uncertain environmental conditions at customers' hands in the field. This paper presents a design stage method for assessing performance reliability of systems with competing time-variant responses due to components with uncertain degradation rates. Herein, system performance measures (e.g. selected responses) are related to their critical levels by time dependent limit-state functions. System failure is defined as the non-conformance of any response, and hence unions of the multiple failure regions are formed. For discrete time, set theory establishes the minimum union size needed to identify a true incremental failure region that emerges from a safe region. A cumulative failure distribution function is built by summing incremental failure probabilities. A practical implementation of the theory is manifest through evaluating probabilities by Monte Carlo simulation. Error analysis suggests ways to predict and minimize errors. An electrical temperature controller shows the details of the method, and the potential of the approach. It is shown that the proposed method provides a more realistic way to predict performance reliability than either worst-case, or simple average-based approaches that are available in the open literature.

[1]  Min Huang,et al.  Drift reliability optimization in IC design: generalized formulation and practical examples , 1993, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[2]  William J. Kolarik,et al.  Multivariate performance reliability prediction in real-time , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Hoang Pham,et al.  Reliability modeling of multi-state degraded systems with multi-competing failures and random shocks , 2005, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[4]  A.C. Brombacher,et al.  A method for reliability optimization through degradation analysis and robust design , 2003, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003..

[5]  G. Hulsken,et al.  Using dynamic reliability models to extend the economic life of strongly innovative products , 2004, IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2004. Conference Record. 2004.

[6]  Gordon J. Savage,et al.  Continuous Taguchi—a model‐based approach to Taguchi's ‘quality by design’ with arbitrary distributions , 1998 .

[7]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[8]  J. Bert Keats,et al.  Statistical Methods for Reliability Data , 1999 .

[9]  Gordon Johnston,et al.  Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[10]  Gordon J. Savage,et al.  Interrelating Quality and Reliability in Engineering Systems , 2002 .

[11]  M. A. Styblinski Formulation of the drift reliability optimization problem , 1991 .

[12]  Wei Huang,et al.  An alternative degradation reliability modeling approach using maximum likelihood estimation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[13]  Kailash C. Kapur,et al.  Issues in modeling system reliability from customer's perspective , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[14]  Gordon J. Savage,et al.  Set theoretic formulation of performance reliability of multiple response time‐variant systems due to degradations in system components , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[15]  W. Nelson Statistical Methods for Reliability Data , 1998 .

[16]  N. Sinnadurai,et al.  The Aging Behavior of Commercial Thick-Film Resistors , 1982 .

[17]  William Q. Meeker,et al.  Reliability: The Other Dimension of Quality , 2004 .

[18]  C. Fornell,et al.  The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings , 1996 .

[19]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[20]  V. Roshan Joseph,et al.  Reliability improvement experiments with degradation data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.