What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality.

Theory and research examining length of acquaintance and consensus among personality judgments have predominantly examined each dimension of personality separately. In L. J. Cronbach's (1955) terminology, this trait-centered approach combines consensus on elevation, differential elevation, and differential accuracy in personality judgments. The current article extends D. A. Kenny's (1991, 1994) weighted average model (WAM)--a theoretical model of the factors that influence agreement among personality judgments--to separate out two of Cronbach's components of consensus: stereotype accuracy and differential accuracy. Consistent with the predictions based on the WAM, as length of acquaintance increased, self-other agreement and consensus differential accuracy increased, stereotype accuracy decreased, and trait-level or raw profile correlations generally remained unchanged. Discussion focuses on the conditions under which a relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement among personality evaluations emerges and how impressions change over time.

[1]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. , 1992 .

[2]  David Watson,et al.  Self- versus peer ratings of specific emotional traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity , 1991 .

[3]  A. Panter,et al.  Shared Meaning and the Convergence among Observers' Personality Descriptions , 1993 .

[4]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Measuring Person Perception Accuracy: Another Look at Self-Other Agreement , 1994 .

[5]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Interpersonal Sensitivity : Theory and Measurement , 2001 .

[6]  R. Hogan,et al.  Explorations in behavioral consistency: properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  J. E. Kurtz,et al.  Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self-other agreement on personality ratings in college roommates. , 2003, Journal of personality.

[8]  A. Story.  Similarity of trait construal and consensus in interpersonal perception , 2003 .

[9]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[10]  Sampo V. Paunonen,et al.  Consensus in Personality Judgments: Moderating Effects of Target-Rater Acquaintanceship and Behavior Observability , 1989 .

[11]  Longitudinal changes in consensus as a function of acquaintance and agreement in liking. , 1997 .

[12]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[13]  G Saucier,et al.  Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: a cross-language replication. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  S G West,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Personality Coherence: Moderating Self-other Profile Agreement and Profile Consensus an Overview of Traditional Research on Moderator Variables , 2022 .

[15]  D. Funder,et al.  Predicting personality and behavior: a boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[17]  S G West,et al.  Consensus, self-other agreement, and accuracy in personality judgment: an introduction. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[18]  The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. , 2001 .

[19]  M C Blackman,et al.  Agreement among judges of personality: interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  C. Judd,et al.  Agreement on initial impressions: Differences due to perceivers, trait dimensions, and target behaviors. , 1989 .

[21]  D. Watson,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Self-other Agreement in Personality and Affectivity: the Role of Acquaintanceship, Trait Visibility, and Assumed Similarity , 2022 .

[22]  S. West,et al.  Towards understanding assessments of the big five: multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[23]  Delroy L. Paulhus,et al.  The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. , 1992 .

[24]  Daniel J. Ozer,et al.  Correlation and the coefficient of determination , 1985 .

[25]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Longitudinal changes in consensus as a function of acquaintance and agreement in liking. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[27]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Aggregating social behavior into person models: perceiver-induced consistency. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  D. Funder,et al.  Differences between traits: properties associated with interjudge agreement. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus in interpersonal perception: acquaintance and the big five. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[31]  D. Watson.  Strangers' Ratings of the Five Robust Personality Factors: Evidence of a Surprising Convergence With Self-Report , 1989 .

[32]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Enhancing target variance in personality impressions: highlighting the person in person perception. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Eva Nick,et al.  The dependability of behavioral measurements: theory of generalizability for scores and profiles , 1973 .

[34]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  D. Funder,et al.  The Effect of Information on Consensus and Accuracy in Personality Judgment , 1998 .

[36]  J. Schafer,et al.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[37]  D. Funder.  On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. , 1995, Psychological review.

[38]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[39]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception. , 1991, Psychological review.

[40]  J. Brian Gray,et al.  Applied Regression Including Computing and Graphics , 1999, Technometrics.

[41]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Handbook of personality psychology. , 1997 .

[42]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Accuracy of Behavioral Predictions at Zero Acquaintance: A Social Relations Analysis , 1993 .

[43]  S. West,et al.  Moderators of self-other agreement: reconsidering temporal stability in personality. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  R. McCrae,et al.  Personality profiles of cultures: aggregate personality traits. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  D. Funder,et al.  Friends and strangers: acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  D. Funder,et al.  Congruence of others' and self-judgments of personality. , 1997 .

[47]  N. Ambady,et al.  On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. , 1995 .

[48]  Mary Ann Collins,et al.  Accurate Social Perception at Zero Acquaintance: The Affordances of a Gibsonian Approach , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[49]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. , 1974 .

[50]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Implicit personality theory and the five-factor model. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[51]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Accuracy in interpersonal perception: a social relations analysis. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. , 1983, Journal of personality.

[53]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[54]  David C. Funder,et al.  Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. , 1999 .

[55]  N. Ambady,et al.  Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[56]  L. Albright,et al.  Effects of communication, information overlap, and behavioral consistency on consensus in social perception. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  PERSON: A General Model of Interpersonal Perception , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[58]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. , 1966 .

[59]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[60]  L. Cronbach.  Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis , 1988 .

[62]  L. R. Goldberg.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[63]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[64]  D. Jackson,et al.  An evaluation of forced-choice and true-false item formats in personality assessment , 1973 .

[65]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  Roger A. Sugden,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys , 1988 .