Decision-making and satisfaction in campus e-voting: moderating effect of trust in the system

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the determinants that influence students’ decision-making and satisfaction in campus e-voting, and to investigate the moderating effect on students’ decision-making and satisfaction in campus e-voting between students with different levels of trust in the system. Design/methodology/approach This study employed a quantitative method and applied the use of self-administered questionnaires among university students who have at least experienced once in casting votes electronically in the past year during the campus e-voting period. The data were analysed using partial least square-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach. Findings The PLS-SEM approach revealed that voters’ commitment to vote was the strongest determinant of students’ decision-making and satisfaction in campus e-voting. Voters’ high satisfaction with campus e-voting was based on the commitment and requirement of students of the university to vote. Compulsory voting was not a hassle for them in order to achieve campus development and sustainability. A moderation analysis revealed that the relative influence of commitment to vote on students’ satisfaction in campus e-voting was higher in the group with medium level of trust than among the group with high level of trust. Practical implications The election commission of the university and the university management should increase students’ turnout and commitment to vote during campus e-voting by outlining effective marketing strategies, campaigns and promotions across a number of digital platforms, including mobile SNS. They need to ensure that voters can sense their involvement is warranted and will continue to vote electronically in the next campus election. Originality/value The research yielded an exclusive perspective into students’ decision-making and satisfaction in campus e-voting. It also uncovered the influence of moderating effect of trust in the system in developing countries which is marginally concealed in the literature. The measurements produced can be used as a research tool for more exploratory and explanatory research related to political marketing among young adult voters.

[1]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Personal identity management and electronic government: The case of the national identity card in the UK , 2007, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[2]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology , 1991 .

[3]  Aron O'Cass,et al.  A micromodel of voter choice: understanding the dynamics of Australian voter characteristics in a federal election , 2002 .

[4]  M. Laroche,et al.  How intangibility affects perceived risk: the moderating role of knowledge and involvement , 2003 .

[5]  L. Flynn,et al.  A Short, Reliable Measure of Subjective Knowledge , 1999 .

[6]  Matt Henn,et al.  Young People, Political Participation and Trust in Britain , 2012 .

[7]  Arend Lijphart Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1996 , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[8]  John H. Antil Conceptualization and Operationalization of Involvement , 1984 .

[9]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Realising e-government in the UK: rural and urban challenges , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[10]  G. Avlonitis,et al.  Political Culture and Perception of Political Marketing Tools: A Cross-Generational Comparison , 2010 .

[11]  J. Barbalet,et al.  A characterization of trust, and its consequences , 2009 .

[12]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[13]  Prasanta K. Pattanaik Counter-threats and Strategic Manipulation under Voting Schemes , 1976 .

[14]  J. Zaichkowsky Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[15]  Marco Ramilli,et al.  A Model for E-voting Systems Evaluation Based on International Standards: Definition and Experimental Validation , 2013 .

[16]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[17]  L. Dubé,et al.  Multiple roles of consumption emotions in post‐purchase satisfaction with extended service transactions , 2000 .

[18]  Mohammad Kamel Alomari,et al.  E-voting adoption in a developing country , 2016 .

[19]  K. Punjaisri,et al.  Political brand identity: An examination of the complexities of Conservative brand and internal market engagement during the 2010 UK General Election campaign , 2016 .

[20]  A. O'Cass Electoral Choice , 2003 .

[21]  Donald P. Moynihan,et al.  Building Secure Elections: E-Voting, Security, and Systems Theory , 2004 .

[22]  A. O'Cass,et al.  The dynamics of voter behavior and influence processes in electoral markets: a consumer behavior perspective , 2005 .

[23]  Tiffany M. Winchester,et al.  Evaluating young adult voter decision-making involvement within a compulsory political system , 2015 .

[24]  N. Manning ‘I mainly look at things on an issue by issue basis’: Reflexivity and phronêsis in young people's political engagements , 2013 .

[25]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Shane P. Singh,et al.  Political knowledge, the decision calculus, and proximity voting , 2014 .

[27]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Political Advertising: A Neglected Policy Issue in Marketing , 1978 .

[28]  David A. Wagner,et al.  Risks of e-voting , 2007, CACM.

[29]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Handbook of Partial Least Squares , 2010 .

[30]  J. Tam,et al.  The moderating effects of purchase importance in customer satisfaction process: An empirical investigation , 2011 .

[31]  Peter Woods,et al.  Predictors for E-government Adoption in Jordan: Deployment of an Empirical Evaluation Based on a Citizen-centric Approach , 2012, Inf. Technol. People.

[32]  Mary Anne Raymond,et al.  Can consumers recognize misleading advertising content in a media rich online environment , 2008 .

[33]  C. Fornell,et al.  Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden , 1994 .

[34]  Anne Powell,et al.  e-Voting intent: A comparison of young and elderly voters , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[36]  Hamzah Elrehail,et al.  E-voting in Jordan: Assessing readiness and developing a system , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  P. Woods,et al.  Exploring citizen perceptions of barriers to e-government adoption in a developing country , 2014 .

[38]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[39]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[40]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[41]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[42]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  The effect of enduring, situational, and response involvement on preference stability in the context of voting behavior , 1992 .

[43]  Matt Henn,et al.  A Generation Apart? Youth and Political Participation in Britain , 2002 .

[44]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Quality of Use of a Complex Technology: A Learning-Based Model , 2005, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[45]  I. McAllister,et al.  Compulsory voting, party stability and electoral advantage in Australia 1 Previous versions of this , 1999 .

[46]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Explaining Trust in IT-Mediated Elections: A Case Study of E-Voting in Brazil , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Wolter Pieters,et al.  Temptations of turnout and modernisation: E-voting discourses in the UK and The Netherlands , 2007, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[48]  Ludwig Christian Schaupp,et al.  E-voting: from apathy to adoption , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[49]  Richard L. Celsi,et al.  The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes , 1988 .

[50]  Arend Lijphart Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma , 1996 .

[51]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .

[52]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective , 2010 .

[53]  I. McAllister Civic Education and Political Knowledge in Australia , 1998 .

[54]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Factors affecting citizen adoption of transactional electronic government , 2014, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[55]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Structural Equations Modeling: Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics , 2010 .

[56]  Philip J. Kitchen Variability in marketing communications research and an editorial request for replication studies , 2016 .

[57]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  Theory and measurement of consumer innovativeness: A transnational evaluation , 1998 .

[58]  Jill Sheppard Compulsory voting and political knowledge: Testing a ‘compelled engagement’ hypothesis , 2015 .

[59]  Paul M. Sniderman,et al.  Reasoning and Choice: The principle–policy puzzle: the paradox of American racial attitudes , 1991 .

[60]  Susan K. Lippert,et al.  Thinking Outside of the Ballot Box: Examining Public Trust in E-Voting Technology , 2008, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[61]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[62]  R. Gibson,et al.  Elections Online: Assessing Internet Voting in Light of the Arizona Democratic Primary , 2001 .

[63]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  Kun Peng,et al.  A general and efficient countermeasure to relation attacks in mix-based e-voting , 2011, International Journal of Information Security.

[65]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Individual Differences in Voting Behavior: Further Investigations of Involvement , 1980 .

[66]  Diego A. López García,et al.  A flexible e-voting scheme for debate tools , 2016, Comput. Secur..

[67]  Anita Harris,et al.  Beyond apathetic or activist youth , 2010 .