Effect of small vent area on a small‐scale methane‐air explosion

A series of small‐scale experiments on vented methane‐air explosions are carried out in a 22 L spherical vented vessel with small vent areas. The experiment is conducted under both constrained and unconstrained circumstances where the dimensionless vent ratios are different. A discussion of the various characteristics of the explosion is presented. Under the constrained circumstances, reduced dimensionless vent ratios can lead to an increase in the maximum explosion venting pressure and in the maximum explosion rising rate, called nonbalanced vented explosions. However, when the dimensionless vent ratios are higher than a certain value, the maximum explosion venting pressure and maximum explosion rising rate do not change, which is called as balanced vented explosions. When the dimensionless vent ratios are between 0.009 and 0.025, it has a remarkable effect. When the dimensionless vent ratio is between 0.00169 and 0.009, it doesn't affect the explosion pressure. However, a very high explosion venting pressure appears. Moreover, the pressure is close to the maximum explosion pressure in a closed vessel. When the dimensionless vent ratios are lower than 0.00169, the maximum explosion venting pressure is higher than the maximum explosion pressure in a confined space. Nevertheless, under the unconstrained circumstances, the maximum explosion venting pressure is always lower than the maximum enclosed explosion pressure despite of different dimensionless vent ratios. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog 37: 294–299, 2018

[1]  C. Catlin Scale effects on the external combustion caused by venting of a confined explosion , 1991 .

[2]  Salah S. Ibrahim,et al.  Studies of premixed flame propagation in explosion tubes , 1999 .

[3]  Richard Siwek,et al.  Explosion venting technology , 1996 .

[4]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Understanding Explosions: Crowl/Understanding , 2003 .

[5]  Gordon E. Andrews,et al.  The effect of vent size and congestion in large-scale vented natural gas/air explosions , 2015 .

[6]  H. Phylaktou,et al.  Experimental study on vented gas explosion in a cylindrical vessel with a vent duct , 2013 .

[7]  J. Leyer,et al.  Flame dynamics in a vented vessel connected to a duct: 1. Mechanism of vessel-duct interaction , 1999 .

[8]  J. Leyer,et al.  Flame dynamics in a vented vessel connected to a duct: 2. Influence of ignition site, membrane rupture, and turbulence , 1999 .

[9]  de Lph Philip Goey,et al.  On the determination of the laminar burning velocity from closed vessel gas explosions , 2003 .

[10]  P. Chatterjee,et al.  An application of 3D gasdynamic modeling for the prediction of overpressures in vented enclosures , 2007 .

[11]  A. Friedrich,et al.  Medium-scale experiments on vented hydrogen deflagration , 2015 .

[12]  A. N. Baratov,et al.  Turbulent gas combustion in an unsealed vessel , 1984 .

[13]  Marc Scheid,et al.  Experiments on the influence of pre-ignition turbulence on vented gas and dust explosions , 2006 .

[14]  Wolfgang Bartknecht,et al.  Explosions, course, prevention, protection , 1981 .

[15]  A. Di Benedetto,et al.  CFD analysis of gas explosions vented through relief pipes. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  Richard A. Thomas,et al.  Flammability of methane, propane, and hydrogen gases , 2000 .