Preventing Suicide and Self-Harm.

BACKGROUND Telephone helplines are considered to play an important role in preventing suicide and self-harm among callers in distress. However, inconsistency in the methods of evaluating such services has limited the firm conclusions that can be drawn. AIMS To evaluate the efficacy of a UK-based helpline from a service user and helpline worker perspective. METHOD Callers were asked about their mental state at the beginning and end of the call with a short questionnaire. Helpline workers were surveyed about their experiences of using the questionnaire as part of routine service provision. RESULTS The helpline was successful at reducing suicidal and self-harming ideation. The short questionnaire method was also successfully integrated into routine practice. CONCLUSION Evaluating the efficacy of helplines can be successfully achieved using the short questionnaire method.

[1]  Alan Woodward,et al.  Frequent callers to crisis helplines: Who are they and why do they call? , 2015, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[2]  J. Pirkis,et al.  Characteristics of People Who Use Telephone Counseling: Findings from Secondary Analysis of a Population-Based Study , 2014, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[3]  Jane Pirkis,et al.  Systematic review of research into frequent callers to crisis helplines , 2014, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[4]  Wendi Cross,et al.  Impact of Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training on the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. , 2013, Suicide & life-threatening behavior.

[5]  Wen-Wei Ho,et al.  Evaluation of the Suicide Prevention Program in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, Using the CIPP Evaluation Model , 2011, Community Mental Health Journal.

[6]  K. Hawton,et al.  Epidemiology and trends in non-fatal self-harm in three centres in England: 2000-2007. , 2010, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[7]  John Kalafat,et al.  An evaluation of crisis hotline outcomes. Part 1: Nonsuicidal crisis callers. , 2007, Suicide & life-threatening behavior.

[8]  John Kalafat,et al.  An evaluation of crisis hotline outcomes. Part 2: Suicidal callers. , 2007, Suicide & life-threatening behavior.

[9]  B. Mishara,et al.  Comparison of the effects of four suicide prevention programs for family and friends of high-risk suicidal men who do not seek help themselves. , 2005, Suicide & life-threatening behavior.

[10]  L. Bickman,et al.  Telephone counselling for adolescent suicide prevention: changes in suicidality and mental state from beginning to end of a counselling session. , 2003, Suicide & life-threatening behavior.

[11]  Keith Hawton,et al.  Suicide following deliberate self-harm: long-term follow-up of patients who presented to a general hospital. , 2003, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[12]  D. de Leo,et al.  Suicide among the elderly: The long-term impact of a telephone support and assessment intervention in northern Italy , 2002, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[13]  A. House,et al.  Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm , 2002, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[14]  C. Bagley,et al.  The evaluation of a suicide prevention scheme by an ecological method. , 1968, Social science & medicine.

[15]  Families..  The Effectiveness and Sufficiency of Services Provided by the New Jersey Based Suicide Prevention Hotlines , 2012 .