Intuitionistic Fuzzy Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach with TOPSIS Method Using Entropy Measure for Weighting Criteria

Selecting a university which provides best education and fulfils all criteria among many alternatives for specific student is a challenging task. Hesitancy and vagueness in decision-making are best dealt with intuitionistic fuzzy sets. It is a multi-criteria decision-making problem among several alternatives involving several academic and non-academic criteria where for student it is difficult to decide precisely based on the available information. The study is concerned with the criteria that influence the student’s university selection and to establish the multi-criteria model for ranking the universities based on important criteria affecting selection by students. In this paper, an intuitionistic fuzzy entropy-based MCDM is proposed with TOPSIS method to determine the vagueness and exactness of alternatives over the effective academic and non-academic criteria; to aggregate the decision-maker’s opinion, intuitionistic fuzzy operator is applied over considered criteria for all alternatives, and the proposed method is applied to rank the universities.

[1]  P. Love,et al.  Factors Influencing the Program Choice of Doctoral Students in Higher Education Administration , 2001 .

[2]  Srivatsa Seshadri,et al.  Differences in College Choice Criteria Between Deciding Students and Their Parents , 2000 .

[3]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[4]  V. Eveland,et al.  Marketing Online Degree Programs: How Do Traditional-Residential Programs Compete? , 2007 .

[5]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: A comparative analysis , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[7]  C. C. LI,et al.  A new measure for supplier performance evaluation , 1997 .

[8]  A. Noorul Haq,et al.  Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model , 2006 .

[9]  Maureen Conard,et al.  An Analysis of Academic Reputation as Perceived by Consumers of Higher Education , 2000 .

[10]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  The Attribute-Dynamic Attitude Model Adam , 1976 .

[11]  C. Simões,et al.  Applying to higher education: information sources and choice factors , 2010 .

[12]  S. Briggs An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: the case of higher education in Scotland , 2006 .

[13]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[14]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[15]  Bogdan Sojkin,et al.  Determinants of higher education choices and student satisfaction: the case of Poland , 2012 .

[16]  Przemyslaw Grzegorzewski,et al.  Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric , 2004, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[17]  Gary David Holt,et al.  WHICH CONTRACTOR SELECTION METHODOLOGY , 1998 .

[18]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[19]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault-tree analysis on printed circuit board assembly , 2006, Microelectron. Reliab..

[20]  G. Soutar,et al.  Students’ preferences for university: a conjoint analysis , 2002 .

[21]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[22]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Strategic Enrolment Management: Improving Student Satisfaction and Success in Portugal. , 2008 .

[23]  Andrea M. Pampaloni The influence of organizational image on college selection: what students seek in institutions of higher education , 2010 .

[24]  M. Y. Bayrak,et al.  A fuzzy approach method for supplier selection , 2007 .

[25]  Jacquelyn Warwick,et al.  Perceived Risk in College Selection: Differences in Evaluative Criteria Used by Students and Parents , 2004 .

[26]  S. Briggs,et al.  Which university? A study of the influence of cost and information factors on Scottish undergraduate choice , 2007 .

[27]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..