Preferences for redistribution and pensions. What can we learn from experiments?

Abstract Redistribution is an inevitable feature of collective pension schemes and economic experiments have revealed that most people have a preference for redistribution that is not merely inspired by self-interest. However, little is known on how these preferences interact with preferences for different pension schemes. In this paper, we review the experimental evidence on preferences for redistribution and suggest some links to redistribution through pensions. For that purpose we distinguish between three types of situations. The first deals with distributional preferences behind a veil of ignorance. In the second type of situation, individuals make choices in front of the veil of ignorance and know their position. Finally, we discuss situations in which income is determined by interdependent rather than individual choices. In the closing sections of the paper, we discuss whether and how these experimental results speak to the redistribution issues of pensions. For example, do they argue for or against mandatory participation? Should we have less redistribution and more actuarial fairness? How does this depend on the type of redistribution involved?

[1]  A. Pereira,et al.  Will Women Save More than Men? A Theoretical Model of Savings and Marriage , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  Christian A. Smith,et al.  On Social Solidarity , 2014 .

[3]  Pamela Jakiela.  How fair shares compare: Experimental evidence from two cultures , 2015 .

[4]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: Comment , 2006 .

[5]  Massimo Florio,et al.  A Fair Price for Energy? Ownership versus Market Opening in the EU15 , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  A. Riedl,et al.  Directed Generosity and Network Formation: Network Dimension Matters , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  Kaisa Herne,et al.  The Role of Information in Choices Over Income Distributions , 2004 .

[8]  Charles Bellemare,et al.  MEASURING INEQUITY AVERSION IN A HETEROGENEOUS POPULATION USING EXPERIMENTAL DECISIONS AND SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES , 2008 .

[9]  Alexander W. Cappelen,et al.  Just Luck: An Experimental Study of Risk Taking and Fairness , 2010 .

[10]  Wolfgang Peters,et al.  Equity as a Prerequisite for Stable Cooperation in a Public-Good Economy - The Core Revisited , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  S. Traub,et al.  Social Preferences and Voting on Reform - An Experimental Study , 2014 .

[12]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[13]  Øystein Foros,et al.  Hotelling Competition with Multi-Purchasing: Time Magazine, Newsweek, or Both? , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  Jean-Robert Tyran,et al.  A Little Fairness May Induce a Lot of Redistribution in Democracy , 2002 .

[15]  Volker Meier,et al.  On the Optimality of Joint Taxation for Non-Cooperative Couples , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  A. Barr,et al.  RISK SHARING, COMMITMENT, AND INFORMATION: AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS , 2008 .

[17]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[18]  Erik Schokkaert,et al.  Equality preference in the claims problem: a questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensions , 2007, Soc. Choice Welf..

[19]  Frederick van der Ploeg,et al.  Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing? , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Biased Judgments of Fairness in Bargaining , 1995 .

[21]  Theo Offerman,et al.  Cooperation in an Overlapping Generations Experiment , 1999, Games Econ. Behav..

[22]  L. Thurow.  The Income Distribution as a Pure Public Good , 1971 .

[23]  Bradley J. Ruffle.  More Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum Games , 1998 .

[24]  E.C.M. van der Heijden,et al.  Transfers and the effect of monitoring in an overlapping-generations experiment , 1998 .

[25]  E. Phelps.  Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory , 1976 .

[26]  Erik Schokkaert,et al.  Moral intuitions and economic models of distributive justice , 1989 .

[27]  Lawrence M. Kahn,et al.  Labor Market Policy: A Comparative View on the Costs and Benefits of Labor Market Flexibility , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness , 1998, Int. J. Game Theory.

[29]  G. Charness,et al.  What's in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum Games , 2003 .

[30]  M. Krawczyk,et al.  Social decisions under risk. Evidence from the probabilistic dictator game , 2008 .

[31]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[32]  G. Charness,et al.  Informal Risk Sharing in an Infinite-Horizon Experiment , 2006 .

[33]  Erik Schokkaert,et al.  Interindividual Differences in Opinions about Distributive Justice , 1991 .

[34]  Timothy C. Salmon,et al.  Social Insurance and Income Redistribution in a Laboratory Experiment , 2012 .

[35]  Jean-Robert Tyran,et al.  Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution☆ , 2012, European economic review.

[36]  S. Gächter,et al.  Dividing Justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims , 2006 .

[37]  Martin Strobel,et al.  Are Family Transfers Crowded Out by Public Transfers? , 2002 .

[38]  Thomas Lange,et al.  A Note on Brain Gain and Brain Drain: Permanent Migration and Education Policy , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[39]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Are Women Less Selfish Than Men?: Evidence From Dictator Experiments , 1998 .

[40]  Simon Gächter,et al.  Moral Property Rights in Bargaining with Infeasible Claims , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Martin Kolmar,et al.  Group Contests with Complementarities in Efforts , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[42]  Torsten Persson,et al.  Social Contracts as Assets : A Possible Solution to the Time-Consistency Problem , 1988 .

[43]  Emin Karagözoğlu,et al.  Information, Uncertainty, and Subjective Entitlements in Bargaining , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[44]  An Experimental Analysis of Group Size , Endowment Uncertainty and Risk Sharing March 2010 , 2010 .

[45]  Erkki Koskela,et al.  Outsourcing Cost and Tax Progression Under Nash Wage Bargaining with Flexible Outsourcing , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[46]  Kenju Akai,et al.  Morals and Mores? Experimental Evidence on Equity and Equality from the US and Japan , 2008 .

[47]  Christian Zimmermann,et al.  Global Climate Change and the Resurgence of Tropical Disease: An Economic Approach , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[48]  M. Mobius,et al.  How Much is a Friend Worth? Directed Altruism and Enforced Reciprocity in Social Networks , 2007 .

[49]  Daniel J. Wilson,et al.  CAN LOWER TAX RATES BE BOUGHT? BUSINESS RENT-SEEKING AND TAX COMPETITION AMONG U.S. STATES , 2009, National Tax Journal.

[50]  R. S. Rosomoff,et al.  The life you save may be your own. , 1996, The Clinical journal of pain.

[51]  L. Thompson,et al.  Social Utility and Decision Making in Interpersonal Contexts , 1989 .

[52]  Robert J. Oxoby,et al.  Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games , 2008 .

[53]  James C. Cox,et al.  When are Women More Generous than Men , 2007 .

[54]  Norman Frohlich,et al.  Choices of Principles of Distributive Justice in Experimental Groups , 1987 .

[55]  Martin Strobel,et al.  Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments , 2002 .

[56]  M. Pesaran.  Predictability of Asset Returns and the Efficient Market Hypothesis , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[57]  Arno Riedl,et al.  Input Versus Output Taxation in an Experimental International Economy , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[58]  A. Riedl,et al.  An experimental investigation of wage taxation and unemployment in closed and open economies , 2007 .

[59]  Leeat Yariv,et al.  The 1/d Law of Giving , 2010 .

[60]  N. Spagnolo,et al.  Liquidity Risk, Credit Risk and the Overnight Interest Rate Spread: A Stochastic Volatility Modelling Approach , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[61]  Daniel Osberghaus,et al.  Total Costs and Budgetary Effects of Adaptation to Climate Change: An Assessment for the European Union , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[62]  M. Yaari,et al.  On dividing justly , 1984 .

[63]  Makoto Okamura,et al.  Partial Tax Coordination in a Repeated Game Setting , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[64]  James Konow,et al.  Fair and square: the four sides of distributive justice , 2001 .

[65]  Marek Brabec,et al.  The Trend of BMI Values by Centiles of US Adults, Birth Cohorts 1882-1986 , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[66]  Alon Harel,et al.  Non-Consequentialist Voting , 2010 .

[67]  Martin Sefton,et al.  Incentives in simple bargaining games , 1992 .

[68]  Massimo Bordignon,et al.  Who Do You Blame in Local Finance? An Analysis of Municipal Financing in Italy , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[69]  L. Putterman,et al.  Reciprocity in a two-part dictator game , 2004 .

[70]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  Laboratory Experiments for Economic Policy Making , 2009 .

[71]  J. Ligthart,et al.  Coordinated Tax-Tariff Reforms, Informality, and Welfare Distribution , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[72]  David L. Dickinson,et al.  What Is Fair? Experimental Evidence , 2002 .

[73]  M. Rabin,et al.  UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL PREFERENCES WITH SIMPLE TESTS , 2001 .

[74]  N. Bardsley.  Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? , 2008 .

[75]  Todd L. Cherry,et al.  Examining the role of fairness in high stakes allocation decisions , 2008 .

[76]  J. List.  On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[77]  W. Gaertner.  A Primer in Social Choice Theory , 2006 .

[78]  J. Potters,et al.  The poverty game and the pension game: The role of reciprocity , 1998 .

[79]  A. Cabrales,et al.  It is Hobbes, not Rousseau: An Experiment on Social Insurance , 2006 .

[80]  James Konow,et al.  A positive theory of economic fairness , 1996 .

[81]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-serving Biases , 1997 .

[82]  E. Fehr.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[83]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  An Experimental Test for Gender Differences in Beneficent Behavior , 1995 .

[84]  S. Gächter.  Behavioral Game Theory , 2008, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[85]  Peter Zweifel,et al.  Is the Welfare State Sustainable ? Experimental Evidence on Citizens ’ Preferences for Redistribution , 2010 .

[86]  Norman Frohlich,et al.  Choosing Justice in Experimental Democracies with Production , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[87]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Social preferences and voting: An exploration using a novel preference revealing mechanism , 2010 .

[88]  Marco Faravelli,et al.  How context matters: A survey based experiment on distributive justice , 2007 .

[89]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  The Contribution of Pharmaceutical Innovation to Longevity Growth in Germany and France , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[90]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Non-reciprocal altruism in dictator games , 2000 .

[91]  G. Clark,et al.  Oxford handbook of pensions and retirement income , 2006 .

[92]  O. Steenbeek,et al.  Costs and benefits of collective pension systems , 2007 .

[93]  V. Smith,et al.  Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games , 2000 .

[94]  Huw Dixon,et al.  Generalized Taylor and Generalized Calvo Price and Wage-Setting: Micro Evidence with Macro Implications , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[95]  Hendrik Jürges,et al.  The effect of compulsory schooling on health—evidence from biomarkers , 2009, Journal of Population Economics.

[96]  Guillaume R. Frechette,et al.  Laboratory Experiments: Professionals Versus Students , 2011 .

[97]  James Konow,et al.  Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions , 2000 .

[98]  Daniel Friedman,et al.  Separating the Hawks from the Doves: Evidence from Continuous Time Laboratory Games , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[99]  V. Smith,et al.  Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply , 1999 .

[100]  Stephen V. Burks,et al.  The effect of stakes in distribution experiments , 2005 .

[101]  John H. Miller,et al.  NOTES AND COMMENTS GIVING ACCORDING TO GARP: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTRUISM , 2002 .

[102]  Esteban F. Klor,et al.  Social Identity and Preferences Over Redistribution , 2007 .

[103]  Axel Ockenfels,et al.  An experimental solidarity game , 1998 .

[104]  James Konow,et al.  Is fairness in the eye of the beholder? An impartial spectator analysis of justice , 2006, Soc. Choice Welf..

[105]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[106]  Xavier Vives,et al.  Public and Private Learning from Prices, Strategic Substitutability and Complementarity, and Equilibrium Multiplicity , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[107]  E. Fehr,et al.  Wage Rigidity in a Competitive Incomplete Contract Market , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[108]  A. Zazzaro,et al.  Competition and Relationship Lending: Friends or Foes? , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[109]  P. Graves,et al.  Benefit-Cost Analysis of Environmental Projects: A Plethora of Systematic Biases , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[110]  Buhong Zheng,et al.  Envy, malice and Pareto efficiency: An experimental examination , 2002, Soc. Choice Welf..

[111]  V. Smith,et al.  Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games , 1994 .

[112]  Alexander W. Cappelen,et al.  The Pluralism of Fairness Ideals: An Experimental Approach , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[113]  Yu Zhu,et al.  The Effect of Education on Marital Status and Partner Characteristics: Evidence from the UK , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.