Smoke over haze: Comparative analysis of satellite, surface radiometer, and airborne in situ measurements of aerosol optical properties and radiative forcing over the eastern United States

[1] In July 2002 Canadian forest fires produced a major smoke episode that blanketed the east coast of the United States. Properties of the smoke aerosol were measured in situ from aircraft, complementing operational Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET), and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) remotely sensed aerosol retrievals. This study compares single scattering albedo and phase function derived from the in situ measurements and AERONET retrievals in order to evaluate their consistency for application to satellite retrievals of optical depth and radiative forcing. These optical properties were combined with MODIS reflectance observations to calculate optical depth. The use of AERONET optical properties yielded optical depths 2–16% lower than those directly measured by AERONET. The use of in situ–derived optical properties resulted in optical depths 22–43% higher than AERONET measurements. These higher optical depths are attributed primarily to the higher absorption measured in situ, which is roughly twice that retrieved by AERONET. The resulting satellite retrieved optical depths were in turn used to calculate integrated radiative forcing at both the surface and top of atmosphere. Comparisons to surface (Surface Radiation Budget Network (SURFRAD) and ISIS) and to satellite (Clouds and Earth Radiant Energy System CERES) broadband radiometer measurements demonstrate that the use of optical properties derived from the aircraft measurements provided a better broadband forcing estimate (21% error) than those derived from AERONET (33% error). Thus AERONET-derived optical properties produced better fits to optical depth measurements, while in situ properties resulted in better fits to forcing measurements. These apparent inconsistencies underline the significant challenges facing the aerosol community in achieving column closure between narrow and broadband measurements and calculations.

[1]  Zhanqing Li,et al.  Smoke over haze: Aircraft observations of chemical and optical properties and the effects on heating rates and stability , 2004 .

[2]  Philip B. Russell,et al.  Geostationary satellite retrievals of aerosol optical thickness during ACE‐Asia , 2003 .

[3]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  High aerosol optical depth biomass burning events: A comparison of optical properties for different source regions , 2003 .

[4]  P. Formenti,et al.  The mean physical and optical properties of regional haze dominated by biomass burning aerosol measured from the C-130 aircraft during SAFARI 2000 , 2003 .

[5]  B. Magi,et al.  Vertical profiles of light scattering, light absorption, and single scattering albedo during the dry, biomass burning season in southern Africa and comparisons of in situ and remote sensing measurements of aerosol optical depths , 2003 .

[6]  M. Wendisch,et al.  Optical closure for an aerosol column: Method, accuracy, and inferable properties applied to a biomass‐burning aerosol and its radiative forcing , 2002 .

[7]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  Aerosol optical properties during the Lindenberg Aerosol Characterization Experiment (LACE 98) , 2002 .

[8]  O. Boucher,et al.  A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system , 2002, Nature.

[9]  J. Conny,et al.  Black carbon and organic carbon in aerosol particles from crown fires in the Canadian boreal forest , 2002 .

[10]  Andrew A. Lacis,et al.  Scattering, Absorption, and Emission of Light by Small Particles , 2002 .

[11]  T. Eck,et al.  Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations , 2002 .

[12]  Philip B. Russell,et al.  Wavelength Dependence of the Absorption of Black Carbon Particles: Predictions and Results from the TARFOX Experiment and Implications for the Aerosol Single Scattering Albedo , 2002 .

[13]  Beat Schmid,et al.  Comparison of Aerosol Single Scattering Albedos Derived by Diverse Techniques in Two North Atlantic Experiments , 2002 .

[14]  Zhanqing Li,et al.  Retrieval of Optical Depth for Heavy Smoke Aerosol Plumes: Uncertainties and Sensitivities to the Optical Properties , 2002 .

[15]  Paul Ginoux,et al.  A Long-Term Record of Aerosol Optical Depth from TOMS Observations and Comparison to AERONET Measurements , 2002 .

[16]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle , 2001, Science.

[17]  Glenn E. Shaw,et al.  Indian Ocean Experiment: An integrated analysis of the climate forcing and effects of the great Indo-Asian haze , 2001 .

[18]  L. Remer,et al.  Smoke aerosol from biomass burning in Mexico: Hygroscopic smoke optical model , 2001 .

[19]  Principal Investigator,et al.  Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services, SSDOO Project, Code 632, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771. , 2001 .

[20]  Zhanqing Li,et al.  Examining the Relationship between Cloud and Radiation Quantities Derived from Satellite Observations and Model Calculations , 2000, Journal of Climate.

[21]  A Comparison of the Aerosol Thickness Derived from Ground-Based and Airborne Measurements , 2000 .

[22]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Reduction of tropical cloudiness by soot , 2000, Science.

[23]  T. Eck,et al.  Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Sun and sky radiance measurements , 2000 .

[24]  John L. Ross,et al.  Properties of aerosols aloft relevant to direct radiative forcing off the mid‐Atlantic coast of the United States , 2000 .

[25]  Sundar A. Christopher,et al.  Use of the Ångstrom exponent to estimate the variability of optical and physical properties of aging smoke particles in Brazil , 1999 .

[26]  D. Tanré,et al.  Remote Sensing of Tropospheric Aerosols from Space: Past, Present, and Future. , 1999 .

[27]  D. Rosenfeld.  TRMM observed first direct evidence of smoke from forest fires inhibiting rainfall , 1999 .

[28]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols , 1999 .

[29]  S. Kinne,et al.  Aerosol-induced radiative flux changes off the United States mid-Atlantic coast: Comparison of values calculated from sunphotometer and in situ data with those measured by airborne pyranometer , 1999 .

[30]  Philip B. Russell,et al.  Aerosol properties and radiative effects in the United States East Coast haze plume: An overview of the Tropospheric Aerosol Radiative Forcing Observational Experiment (TARFOX) , 1999 .

[31]  W. Steen.  Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1999 .

[32]  John L. Ross,et al.  Radiative characteristics of regional hazes dominated by smoke from biomass burning in Brazil: Closure tests and direct radiative forcing , 1998 .

[33]  D. Blake,et al.  Physical, chemical, and optical properties of regional hazes dominated by smoke in Brazil , 1998 .

[34]  T. Eck,et al.  Comparisons of techniques for measuring shortwave absorption and black carbon content of aerosols from biomass burning in Brazil , 1998 .

[35]  B. Holben,et al.  Smoke, Clouds, and Radiation-Brazil (SCAR-B) Experiment , 1998 .

[36]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Biomass burning aerosol size distribution and modeled optical properties , 1998 .

[37]  Zhanqing Li,et al.  The direct radiative effect of smoke aerosols on atmospheric absorption of visible sunlight , 1998 .

[38]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[39]  Catherine Gautier,et al.  SBDART: A Research and Teaching Software Tool for Plane-Parallel Radiative Transfer in the Earth's Atmosphere. , 1998 .

[40]  Zhanqing Li.  Influence of Absorbing Aerosols on the Inference of Solar Surface Radiation Budget and Cloud Absorption , 1998 .

[41]  Z. Li,et al.  Radiative Forcing by Smoke Aerosols Determined from Satellite and Surface Measurements , 1998 .

[42]  D. Tanré,et al.  ALGORITHM FOR REMOTE SENSING OF TROPOSPHERIC AEROSOL FROM MODIS , 1998 .

[43]  P. Hobbs,et al.  Airborne measurements of carbonaceous aerosols on the East Coast of the United States , 1997 .

[44]  John R. Miller,et al.  Multialtitude airborne observations of insolation effects of forest fire smoke aerosols at BOREAS: Estimates of aerosol optical parameters , 1997 .

[45]  Philip B. Russell,et al.  Chemical apportionment of aerosol column optical depth off the mid‐Atlantic coast of the United States , 1997 .

[46]  Y. Kaufman,et al.  The effect of smoke particles on clouds and climate forcing , 1997 .

[47]  B. Holben,et al.  Urban/industrial aerosol: Ground‐based Sun/sky radiometer and airborne in situ measurements , 1997 .

[48]  Robert A. Kotchenruther,et al.  Direct Radiative Forcing by Smoke from Biomass Burning , 1997, Science.

[49]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Information on aerosol size distribution contained in solar reflected spectral radiances , 1996 .

[50]  P. Hobbs,et al.  Numerical modeling of ship tracks produced by injections of cloud condensation nuclei into marine stratiform clouds , 1995 .

[51]  Christine A. O'Neill,et al.  Effects of Aerosol from Biomass Burning on the Global Radiation Budget , 1992, Science.

[52]  Hsueh-Chia Chang,et al.  Determination of the wavelength dependence of refractive indices of flame soot , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[53]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Satellite measurements of large‐scale air pollution: Methods , 1990 .

[54]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Remote sensing of biomass burning in the tropics , 1990 .

[55]  C. Bohren.  Multiple scattering of light and some of its observable consequences , 1987 .

[56]  A. Schuster.  On the absorption and scattering of light , 1920 .