Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Exploring the Influence of Cultural Values on the Acceptance of Information Technology: an Application of the Technology Acceptance Model

Introduction A fact of life for many companies, foreign and domestic, large and small, is how to be competitive in the global marketplace. This is especially so in the application of information technology to their operations on a global scale. The expanding interdependent global economy and the accompanying changes in the structure of competition are forcing many companies to seek new ways to manage their businesses. There is a growing need for coordination in the areas of product design, production, and distribution across country units in order to achieve global economies of scale and provide consistent quality service to global corporate customers. This growth of multinational business has been accompanied by significant increases in the adoption of new technologies around the world. Yet, the development of IT in a global environment is complex and significantly different from IT development within a domestic environment. Due to the differences existing in the political/legal, social/cultural, technological, and economic dimensions of the host country, as well as affiliate country=s environments, the implementation of global IT could pose major problems. Therefore, companies need to develop not just a generally favorable culture but also specific cultural characteristics to maximize the use of technology to the performance of their employees (Yip, 1995). The purpose of this paper is to explore IT adoption and its relationship with national culture. Specifically, it is argued that knowledge of the cultural orientation of organizational employees will greatly facilitate IT adoption and implementation, which in turn will con tribute to a successful company. Hunger and Wheelen (1995) point out that an optimal culture is one that best supports the mission and strategy of the company of which it is a part. Given the fact that 25 percent to 50 percent of an employee's behavior on the job is culturally determined (Gannon, 1994), one needs to understand the cultural values behind this employee. The critical challenge is to help employees relate better to global problems and opportunities (Garland & Farmer, 1986). Culture As early as 1952, researchers identified more than 160 definitions of culture, and in 1994, it was estimated that culture has been defined in approximately 400 ways (Ferraro, 1994). This paper will simply supply the reader with a brief introduction to the notion, rather than explore the many definitions. However, there is a common view in research concerning the basic meaning of culture: individually, we are all different, but share similar experiences with those who grew up in the same surroundings, in the same type of society as us. In this way, there are cultural differences between, for example: nations, regions, social classes, generations, organizations, etc. An operational definition of Culture, therefore, is: (1) something that is shared by all, or almost all members of some social group; (2) something that the older members of the group try to pass on to the younger members; and (3) something (as in the case of morals, laws and customs) that shapes behavior, or that structures one's perception of the world. Consequently, this is why a) culture is always a collective phenomenon (to be distinguished from the individual level), b) deep cultural values change relatively slowly over time, and c) collective cultural values influence the definition of laws, management styles, political institutions, the construction of theories and ways of carrying out research (Francesco & Gold, 1998). The key terms are the values and expectations that individuals bring into the work place. Therefore, increased knowledge about such factors as what motivates people from other cultures in how they will react under certain circumstances, in which way they make decisions and want shorter decisions to be made, the way they communicate, how they want contracts to be stipulated, how their performance is evaluated, etc. …

[1]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems in organization theory: a review , 1987 .

[2]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[3]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  A Comprehensive Model for Measuring the Potential Impact of Information Technology on Organizational Strategic Variables , 1991 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Anthony L. Amadeo Cultural Dimensions of International Business , 1991 .

[7]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Consensus and Perceived Satisfaction Levels: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of GSS and Non-GSS Outcomes within and between the United States and Mexico , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Barry A. Gold,et al.  International Organizational Behavior , 2004 .

[10]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Anthony R White,et al.  Strategic management , 1986 .

[12]  James Brian Quinn,et al.  The Strategy Process , 1988 .

[13]  A. Kimball Romney,et al.  Variations in value orientations. , 1961 .

[14]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Global Measures of Information Service Quality: A Cross‐National Study , 1995 .

[15]  C. Cooper,et al.  Predicting Success in Joint Venture Organisations in Information Technology , 1989 .

[16]  Randolph B. Cooper,et al.  GSS participation: A cultural examination , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[18]  Varun Grover,et al.  Organizational practice, information resource deployment and systems success: a cross-cultural survey , 1994, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[19]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[20]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Culture: a fourth dimension of group support systems , 1994, CACM.

[21]  Varun Grover,et al.  An Empirically Derived Taxonomy of Information Technology Structure and Its Relationship to Organizational Structure , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Mark Srite,et al.  The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance , 2006, MIS Q..

[23]  C. Hampden-Turner,et al.  Riding the Waves of Culture. Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business (3rd ed) , 1993 .

[24]  Alfons Trompenaars,et al.  Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business , 1993 .

[25]  H. Russell Johnston,et al.  Developing Capabilities to Use Information Strategically , 1988, MIS Q..

[26]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Thomas L. Wheelen,et al.  Strategic Management , 1983 .

[28]  Dee G. Appley Beyond Culture , 1977 .

[29]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[30]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Variations in value orientations. , 1961 .

[31]  Susan Kitchell Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovation adoption: A qualitative/quantitative approach , 1995 .

[32]  G. Hofstede Cultural constraints in management theories , 1993 .

[33]  M. Gannon,et al.  Understanding Global Cultures: Metaphorical Journeys Through 17 Countries , 1994 .

[34]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[35]  Tsun-yan Hsieh,et al.  Teamwork across Time and Space , 1997 .