On Coadaptation in Drosophila

The coadaptation of the gene complexes carried by different gene arrangements within a population depends upon the integrity of the genic contents of the inverted segments. Certain combinations of inversions-triads, in the above account-destroy this integrity by facilitating serial transfer of genes from one arrangement to another by crossing-over. Since the different inversions of a population are generally coadapted, populations should possess with high frequency, at most, two of the three inversions of any one triad. In general, the data from populations of D. robusta and D. pseudoobscura support this hypothesis; one member of each triad is usually absent or rare within any one locality. Three inversions that are not members of a triad should not be opposed by selection and, in agreement with the hypothesis, three such inversions are frequently present in populations with high frequency. We conclude that coadaptation frequently outweighs aneuploidy as a selective force in determining inversion frequencies within populations. The possible role of triads in the geographical distribution of inversions and in speciation are also discussed.

[1]  B. Kaufmann,et al.  An Analysis of Variability Arising through Recombination. , 1953, Genetics.

[2]  B. Wallace,et al.  Genetic Changes in Populations Under Irradiation , 1951, The American Naturalist.

[3]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  ADAPTIVE CHROMOSOMAL POLYMORPHISM IN DROSOPHILA WILLISTONI , 1950 .

[4]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  INDETERMINATE OUTCOME OF CERTAIN EXPERIMENTS ON DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS , 1953 .

[5]  C. Pavan Chromosomal Variation in Drosophila Nebulosa. , 1946, Genetics.

[6]  H. Carson,et al.  GENE ARRANGEMENTS IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA ROBUSTA STURTEVANT , 1947 .

[7]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  Chromosomal Aberrations in Brazilian Drosophila Ananassae. , 1943, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  E. Novitski Chromosome Variation in Drosophila Athabasca. , 1946, Genetics.

[9]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of heterosis through natural selection in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. , 1950, Genetics.

[10]  H. Carson The Effects of Inversions on Crossing over in Drosophila Robusta. , 1953, Genetics.

[11]  M. Vetukhiv Viability of Hybrids Between Local Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. , 1953, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. Sturtevant Essays on Evolution. III. On the Origin of Interspecific Sterility , 1938, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[13]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  STRUCTURE AND VARIATION OF THE CHROMOSOMES IN DROSOPHILA AZTECA , 1939 .

[14]  M. Levitan Experiments on chromosomal variability in Drosophila robusta. , 1951, Genetics.

[15]  B. Wallace,et al.  A Genetic Analysis of the Adaptive Values of Populations. , 1952, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  K. Koopman NATURAL SELECTION FOR REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND DROSOPHILA PERSIMILIS , 1950 .

[17]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  The Suppression of Crossing Over in Inversion Heterozygotes of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. , 1948, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  T. Dobzhansky Chromosomal Variation in Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura Which Inhabit Northern Mexico , 1948, The American Naturalist.

[19]  D. Miller Structure and Variation of the Chromosomes in Drosophila Algonquin. , 1939, Genetics.

[20]  吉川 秀男 Studies on the genetics and cytology of Drosophila ananassae , 1937 .