Cyclic behavior of seesaw energy dissipation system with steel slit dampers

This paper presents an investigation into the cyclic behavior of a passive vibration control system in which steel slit dampers are applied to a seesaw energy dissipation system. The fundamental concept of the seesaw system is the quasi-linear motion mechanism, which enables the bracing members to remain in tension during vibration. The lateral stiffness and strength formulae of the frame with this system are derived first. Six cyclic loading tests were conducted to reveal that the proposed system has a stable hysteretic property and a large energy dissipation capacity. For all specimens, the slit dampers yielded at early stages of the tests around a story rotation angle of 0.001 rad. This property is preferred for energy dissipation properties to reduce story drift in building structures under seismic loads. The important seesaw system characteristic of the bracing members remaining tensile was also observed. The tri-linear hysteretic model is introduced to model the cyclic behavior of the proposed damping system. A comparison of the hysteretic loops and the energy dissipation amount between the model and test results reveals the adaptability of the tri-linear model to the hysteretic behavior of the proposed system. The validity of the stiffness and strength prediction is also shown from the test results.

[1]  Faris Albermani,et al.  Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation , 2008 .

[2]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Component Testing, Seismic Evaluation and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Braces , 2004 .

[3]  Amir Ahmad Hedayat,et al.  Post-Northridge connections with slit dampers to enhance strength and ductility , 2013 .

[4]  Sang-Hoon Oh,et al.  Seismic performance of steel structures with slit dampers , 2009 .

[5]  Mamoru Iwata,et al.  Buckling‐restrained brace using steel mortar planks; performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper , 2006 .

[6]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces , 2003 .

[7]  Hiroshi Tagawa,et al.  Seismic response of steel structures with seesaw systems using viscoelastic dampers , 2013 .

[8]  Hiroshi Tagawa,et al.  Seismic performance of steel structures with seesaw energy dissipation system using fluid viscous dampers , 2013 .

[9]  Keh‐Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Design of Steel Triangular Plate Energy Absorbers for Seismic-Resistant Construction , 1993 .

[10]  S. Maleki,et al.  Dual-pipe damper , 2013 .

[11]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  ENERGY INPUT AND DISSIPATION BEHAVIOUR OF STRUCTURES WITH HYSTERETIC DAMPERS , 1996 .

[12]  Keiichiro Suita,et al.  Mechanical property of beam-to-column moment connection with hysteretic dampers for column weak axis , 2005 .

[13]  Hiroshi Tagawa,et al.  Evaluation of vibration control system with U-dampers based on quasi-linear motion mechanism , 2012 .

[14]  Mahmud Ashraf,et al.  Theoretical evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation , 2009 .

[15]  T. T. Soong,et al.  STRUCTURAL CONTROL: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 1997 .

[16]  Qiang Xie,et al.  State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia , 2005 .

[17]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of a Large-Scale Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame , 2007 .

[18]  Amadeo Benavent-Climent,et al.  A brace-type seismic damper based on yielding the walls of hollow structural sections , 2010 .