Prediction of remaining useful life under different conditions using accelerated life testing data

Prognostics methods model the degradation of system performance and predict remaining useful life using degradation data measured during service. However, obtaining degradation data from in-service systems in practice is either difficult or expensive. Therefore, accelerated life testing (ALT) is instead frequently performed for validating designs using considerably heavy loads. This work discusses the methods and effectiveness of utilizing ALT degradation data for the prognostics of a system. Depending on the degradation model and loading conditions, four different ways of utilizing ALT data for prognostics are discussed. A similar transformation method used in ALT is adopted to convert accelerated loading conditions to field loading conditions. To demonstrate the proposed approach, synthetic data are generated for crack growth under accelerated loading conditions; these data are used for training a neural network model or identifying model parameters in a particle filter. The applied example shows that the use of ALT data increases the accuracy of prognostics in the early stages in all four cases and compensates for the problem posed by data insufficiency through the proposed method.

[1]  Mark Schwabacher,et al.  A Survey of Data -Driven Prognostics , 2005 .

[2]  Sankalita Saha,et al.  On Applying the Prognostic Performance Metrics , 2009 .

[3]  J. Celaya,et al.  Prognostics of Power Mosfets Under Thermal Stress Accelerated Aging Using Data-Driven and Model-Based Methodologies , 2011 .

[4]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  Model-Based Prognostic Techniques Applied to a Suspension System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[5]  J. Newman,et al.  Fatigue-life prediction methodology using small-crack theory , 1999 .

[6]  Xin Yao,et al.  Evolving artificial neural networks , 1999, Proc. IEEE.

[7]  Dawn An,et al.  Prognostics 101: A tutorial for particle filter-based prognostics algorithm using Matlab , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  H. Sorenson,et al.  Bayesian Parameter Estimation , 2006, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[9]  T. Bayes An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances , 2003 .

[10]  Suk Joo Bae,et al.  Direct Prediction Methods on Lifetime Distribution of Organic Light-Emitting Diodes From Accelerated Degradation Tests , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[11]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2003 .

[12]  Zhaobin Wang,et al.  Study on feasibility of storage accelerated testing based on parameter degradation for aerospace relays , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE 2012 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-2012 Beijing).

[13]  Daniel Svozil,et al.  Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks , 1997 .

[14]  Howard R. Waters,et al.  Gamma Processes and Finite Time Survival Probabilities , 1993, ASTIN Bulletin.

[15]  Nam H. Kim,et al.  Identification of correlated damage parameters under noise and bias using Bayesian inference , 2011 .

[16]  Jonathan A. DeCastro,et al.  Exact Nonlinear Filtering and Prediction in Process Model-Based Prognostics , 2009 .

[17]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[18]  Daming Lin,et al.  A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance , 2006 .

[19]  Matthias W. Seeger,et al.  Gaussian Processes For Machine Learning , 2004, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[20]  Kishan G. Mehrotra,et al.  Forecasting the behavior of multivariate time series using neural networks , 1992, Neural Networks.

[21]  Christina Willhauck,et al.  Mixed Gaussian process and state-space approach for fatigue crack growth prediction , 2007 .

[22]  Dawn An,et al.  Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Bo-Suk Yang,et al.  Data-driven approach to machine condition prognosis using least square regression tree , 2009 .

[24]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  Editors: Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2001 .

[26]  George Eastman House,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine , 2001 .

[27]  W. Meeker Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analyses , 1991 .

[28]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A data-driven fuzzy approach for predicting the remaining useful life in dynamic failure scenarios of a nuclear system , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  Accelerated life tests for prognostic and health management of MEMS devices. , 2014 .

[30]  Jay Lee,et al.  A Hybrid Method for On-line Performance Assessment and Life Prediction in Drilling Operations , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics.

[31]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[32]  P. C. Paris,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws , 1963 .