Myths, misconceptions and an alternative perspective on information usage and the electronic medium

Hypertext represents the forefront of a technological wave in education that is driven more by enthusiasm for the computer than by reliable knowledge of the human user. This chapter outlines some of the myths and misconceptions that have emerged in recent years about hypertext and its use for information-intensive activities such as learning. In so doing, it emphasizes experimental evidence over wishful thinking and outlines an ergonomic perspective on human information usage that seeks to maximize usability and ultimately the acceptability of this emerging technology.

[1]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  A Survey of usability evaluation practices and requirements in the European IT industry , 1993 .

[2]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[3]  N. Hammond,et al.  Learning with Hypertext : Problems, Principles and Prospects , 1993 .

[4]  George H. Collier,et al.  Thoth-II: hypertext with explicit semantics , 1987, Hypertext.

[5]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature , 1992 .

[6]  Ken Eason,et al.  Putting Social Science to Work: The Ground between Theory and Use Explored through Case Studies in Organisations , 1991 .

[7]  T. R. Girill,et al.  Reading patterns in online documentation: How transcript analysis reflects text design, software constraints, and user preferences , 1987 .

[8]  Andrew Dillon.  Requirements analysis for hypertext applications: the why, what and how approach , 1991 .

[9]  Davida Charney,et al.  Comprehending non-linear text: the role of discourse cues and reading strategies , 1987, Hypertext.

[10]  T. Landauer.  Let's get real: a position paper on the role of cognitive psychology in the design of humanly useful and usable systems , 1991 .

[11]  Gerry Souter,et al.  What is Multimedia , 1997 .

[12]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  As we may think , 1945, INTR.

[13]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Readers' Models of Text Structures: The Case of Academic Articles , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[14]  Jacquetta Megarry.  Hypertext and compact discs: the challenge of multi-media learning , 1988 .

[15]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  A Comparison of Linear and Hypertext Formats in Information Retrieval , 1989, UK Hypertext.

[16]  T. R. Girill,et al.  DOCUMENTS: an interactive online solution to four documentation problems , 1983, CACM.

[17]  James Larkin,et al.  Hypertext and pluralism: from lineal to non-lineal thinking , 1987, Hypertext.

[18]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  The human factors of journal usage and the design of electronic text , 1989 .

[19]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Project CHIRO : collaborative hypertext in research organisations : final report , 1994 .

[20]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  HyperText/Hypermedia , 1989 .

[21]  Cliff McKnight,et al.  Hypertext in Context , 1991 .

[22]  Ruth V. Small,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Information-Seeking Behaviors and Learning with Hypermedia Information Systems. , 1992 .

[23]  R. T. Wilkinson,et al.  Proof-reading: VDU and paper text compared for speed, accuracy and fatigue , 1987 .

[24]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Space - the Final Chapter or Why Physical Representations are not Semantic Intentions , 1993 .

[25]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Hypertext and hypermedia , 1990 .

[26]  V Barnes,et al.  Reading Is Slower from CRT Displays than from Paper: Attempts to Isolate a Single-Variable Explanation , 1987, Human factors.

[27]  W. Cushman.  Reading from Microfiche, a VDT, and the Printed Page: Subjective Fatigue and Performance , 1986, Human factors.

[28]  Paul A. Kolers,et al.  Processing of visible language , 1979 .