A comparison of phosphor-plate digital images with conventional radiographs for the perceived clarity of fine endodontic files and periapical lesions.

OBJECTIVE We sought to compare digital images with radiographs for the perceived clarity of small endodontic file tips at 2 different working lengths, as well as for the visualization of periapical bone lesions. STUDY DESIGN Standardized conventional radiographic and phosphor-plate digital images were taken of 20 extracted permanent mandibular molars with 06 K-files placed in the distal root canal either 2 mm short or flush with the apical foramen. Similar images were obtained from mandibles with teeth that demonstrated large (n = 10) or small (n = 10) periapical lesions. Four evaluators ranked the clarity of the digital image with that of the radiograph. Results were analyzed by using the 2-sided sign test, ordinal logistic regression, and the kappa test. RESULTS The perceived clarity of an endodontic file tip, at any position, and of a small or large periapical lesion was significantly (P < .01) less on all digital images compared with conventional films. CONCLUSION Evaluator ratings indicated that the perceived clarity of fine endodontic files and periapical lesions was significantly less with phosphor-plate digital images than with conventional radiographs.

[1]  C Kobayashi,et al.  Electronic canal length measurement. , 1995, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[2]  G Sundqvist,et al.  Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. , 1990, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  K Horner,et al.  Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography. , 1991, International endodontic journal.

[4]  K Horner,et al.  Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. , 1990, Quintessence international.

[5]  H. Messer,et al.  Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography. , 1998, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  A. Richards,et al.  Radiographic interpretation of experimentally produced bony lesions. , 1974, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[7]  G C Sanderink,et al.  Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths. , 1996, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[8]  L. Hollender,et al.  Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  R A Cederberg,et al.  Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[10]  S. Seltzer,et al.  Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: I. 1961. , 1961, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  H. Messer,et al.  Radiographic appearance of artificially prepared periapical lesions confined to cancellous bone , 1986 .

[12]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  An image plate system for digital intra-oral radiography. , 1996, Dental update.

[13]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system. , 1996, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[14]  J. J. Legan,et al.  Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  E. Rivera,et al.  Storage-phosphor computed radiography versus film radiography in the detection of pathologic periradicular bone loss in cadavers. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.