Modelling planktonic ecosystems: parameterizing complexity

This paper explores several simplified representations of complexity or ecological ‘texture’ in models of the marine planktonic ecosystem. It is relatively straightforward to formulate more complex models to include explicitly different functional groups of phytoplankton, zooplankton and bacteria, and to include regulation by multiple nutrients such a nitrate, ammonium, silica, and iron. However, the number of parameters that must be specified from observations increases approximately as the square of the number of compartments and quickly surpasses our ability to constrain them properly from observations. Moreover, ecosystem models often become unstable for small changes in parameter values, and increasing complexity may not lead to increased stability. Here we consider alternative formulations for ecosystem models that try to represent complex interactions, such as the microbial loop, in simpler, less explicit ways. Results are presented demonstrating diagnostic methods to represent (1) multiple size classes of phytoplankton according to total biomass of a single phytoplankton compartment, and (2) partitioning a single compartment for nitrogen into nitrate and ammonium according to the origin of incoming fluxes, nitrification by bacteria, and a relative preference algorithm for uptake by phytoplankton. Ambient concentrations of ammonium are simulated with this model and evaluated against observations from Ocean Station P in the subarctic Northeast Pacific Ocean.

[1]  J. G. Field,et al.  The Ecological Role of Water-Column Microbes in the Sea* , 1983 .

[2]  L. Legendre,et al.  Effects of pelagic food-web interactions and nutrient remineralization on the biogeochemical cycling of carbon: a modeling approach , 2000 .

[3]  P. Boyd,et al.  Elevated consumption of carbon relative to nitrogen in the surface ocean , 1993, Nature.

[4]  Robert M. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  F. Rassoulzadegan,et al.  Food-web mediated export of biogenic carbon in oceans: hydrodynamic control , 1996 .

[6]  P. Falkowski Rationalizing elemental ratios in unicellular algae , 2000 .

[7]  J. Goering,et al.  UPTAKE OF NEW AND REGENERATED FORMS OF NITROGEN IN PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY1 , 1967 .

[8]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Grazing limitation and nutrient limitation in marine ecosystems: Steady state solutions of an ecosystem model with multiple food chains , 1994 .

[9]  B. Frost A modelling study of processes regulating plankton standing stock and production in the open Subarctic Pacific Ocean , 1993 .

[10]  K. Denman,et al.  The structure of pelagic marine ecosystems. , 1978 .

[11]  R. Olson,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL PHOTOINHIBITION OF MARINE NITRIFYING BACTERIA: A POSSIBLE MECHANISM FOR THE FORMATION OF THE PRIMARY NITRITE MAXIMUM , 1981 .

[12]  R. Armstrong Stable model structures for representing biogeochemical diversity and size spectra in plankton communities , 1999 .

[13]  G. Ærtebjerg,et al.  Picoalgae in Danish coastal waters during summer stratification , 1991 .

[14]  Alan A. Berryman,et al.  The Orgins and Evolution of Predator‐Prey Theory , 1992 .

[15]  Q. Dortch,et al.  The interaction between ammonium and nitrate uptake in phytoplankton , 1990 .

[16]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Consequences of Ratio‐Dependent Predation for Steady‐State Properties of Ecosystems , 1992 .

[17]  David Archer,et al.  Modeling the impact of fronts and mesoscale circulation on the nutrient supply and biogeochemistry of the upper ocean , 2000 .

[18]  D. Deibel,et al.  Microzooplankton bacterivory and herbivory in the NE subarctic Pacific , 1999 .

[19]  Kevin E. Kohler,et al.  A four-component ecosystem model of biological activity in the Arabian Sea , 1996 .

[20]  P. Wheeler New production in the subarctic Pacific Ocean: Net changes in nitrate concentrations, rates of nitrate assimilation and accumulation of particulate nitrogen , 1993 .

[21]  Nicholas R. Bates,et al.  Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Component of the Biological Pump in the North Atlantic Ocean [and Discussion] , 1995 .

[22]  A. Oschlies Model-derived estimates of new production: New results point towards lower values , 2001 .

[23]  J. G. Field,et al.  General allometric equations for rates of nutrient uptake, ingestion, and respiration in plankton organisms , 1989 .

[24]  David M. Karl,et al.  Seasonal and interannual variability in primary production and particle flux at Station ALOHA , 1996 .

[25]  Frank Lunkeit,et al.  Earth system models of intermediate complexity: closing the gap in the spectrum of climate system models , 2002 .

[26]  Paul G. Falkowski,et al.  Evolution of the nitrogen cycle and its influence on the biological sequestration of CO2 in the ocean , 1997, Nature.

[27]  F. A. Richards,et al.  The influence of organisms on the composition of sea-water , 1963 .

[28]  J. Steele,et al.  The role of predation in plankton models , 1992 .

[29]  S. Doney Major challenges confronting marine biogeochemical modeling , 1999 .

[30]  Farooq Azam,et al.  Microbial Control of Oceanic Carbon Flux: The Plot Thickens , 1998, Science.

[31]  J. Riley Progress in Oceanography , 1964, Nature.

[32]  P. Boyd,et al.  Does planktonic community structure determine downward particulate organic carbon flux in different oceanic provinces , 1999 .

[33]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Zooplankton mortality and the dynamical behaviour of plankton population models , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[34]  J. Wroblewski,et al.  A model of phytoplankton plume formation during variable Oregon upwelling , 1977 .

[35]  James J. Elser,et al.  Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry , 1996 .

[36]  M. Collins,et al.  Projections of future climate change , 2002 .

[37]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[38]  R. Goericke,et al.  Primary production in the subarctic Pacific Ocean: Project SUPER , 1993 .

[39]  Paul G. Falkowski,et al.  Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea , 1992 .

[40]  K. Denman,et al.  A coupled 1-D biological/physical model of the northeast subarctic Pacific Ocean with iron limitation , 1999 .

[41]  A. Gargett Physical processes and the maintenance of nutrient‐rich euphotic zones , 1991 .

[42]  R. Eppley,et al.  Ammonium distribution in southern California coastal waters and its role in the growth of phytoplankton1 , 1979 .

[43]  Patrick Raimbault,et al.  Size fraction of phytoplankton in the Ligurian Sea and the Algerian Basin (Mediterranean Sea): size distribution versus total concentration , 1988 .

[44]  Richard J. Matear,et al.  Parameter optimization and analysis of ecosystem models using simulated annealing: a case study at Station P , 1995 .

[45]  K. Denman,et al.  Simulation of the planktonic ecosystem response to pre- and post-1976 forcing in an isopycnic model of the North Pacific , 2001 .

[46]  W. K. Johnson,et al.  Seasonal and interannual variability in particle fluxes of carbon, nitrogen and silicon from time series of sediment traps at Ocean Station P, 1982–1993: relationship to changes in subarctic primary productivity , 1999 .

[47]  V. A. Ryabchenko,et al.  Chaotic behaviour of an ocean ecosystem model under seasonal external forcing , 1997 .

[48]  G. Evans,et al.  The role of local models and data sets in the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study , 1999 .

[49]  Andrew M. Edwards,et al.  Adding Detritus to a Nutrient–Phytoplankton–Zooplankton Model:A Dynamical-Systems Approach , 2001 .

[50]  D. Hutchins,et al.  Size-fractionated biological iron and carbon uptake along a coastal to offshore transect in the NE Pacific , 1999 .

[51]  S. Doney,et al.  An intermediate complexity marine ecosystem model for the global domain , 2001 .

[52]  M. Fasham Variations in the seasonal cycle of biological production in subarctic oceans: A model sensitivity analysis , 1995 .

[53]  W. Sunda,et al.  Interrelated influence of iron, light and cell size on marine phytoplankton growth , 1997, Nature.

[54]  K. Denman,et al.  Simulations of Marine Ecosystem Response to Climate Variation with a One Dimensional Coupled Ecosystem/Mixed Layer Model , 2002 .

[55]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Multiple nutrient limitations in ecological models , 1989 .

[56]  Ricardo M Letelier,et al.  Ecosystem changes in the North Pacific subtropical gyre attributed to the 1991–92 El Niño , 1995, Nature.

[57]  J. G. Field,et al.  The size-based dynamics of plankton food webs. I. A simulation model of carbon and nitrogen flows , 1991 .

[58]  K. Denman,et al.  The response of two coupled one-dimensional mixed layer/planktonic ecosystem models to climate change in the NE subarctic Pacific Ocean , 2002 .

[59]  J. Steele Incorporating the microbial loop in a simple plankton model , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  B. Irwin,et al.  The kinetics of nitrogen utilization in the oceanic mixed layer: Nitrate and ammonium interactions at nanomolar concentrations , 1996 .

[61]  Andrew M. Edwards,et al.  The role of higher predation in plankton population models , 2000 .

[62]  F. Chai,et al.  Iron and grazing constraints on primary production in the central equatorial Pacific: An EqPac synthesis , 1997 .

[63]  P. Harrison,et al.  Seasonal variability in nitrogenous nutrition of phytoplankton assemblages in the northeastern subarctic Pacific Ocean , 1999 .

[64]  H. Ducklow,et al.  A nitrogen-based model of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer , 1990 .

[65]  M. M. Mullin,et al.  Relation between biomass and body weight of plankton in a steady state oceanic ecosystem1 , 1986 .

[66]  David M. Glover,et al.  A new coupled, one-dimensional biological-physical model for the upper ocean: Applications to the JGOFS Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) site , 1996 .

[67]  R. W. Sheldon,et al.  The Size Distribution of Particles in the OCEAN1 , 1972 .

[68]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Nitrogenous nutrition of the plankton in the Chesapeake Bay. 1. Nutrient availability and phytoplankton preferences , 1977 .

[69]  R. Riegman,et al.  The relative preference index (RPI) for phytoplankton nitrogen use is only weakly related to physiological preference , 1996 .

[70]  W. G. Sprules,et al.  Plankton Size Spectra in Relation to Ecosystem Productivity, Size, and Perturbation , 1986 .

[71]  D. Olson,et al.  Modelling pelagic biogeography , 1994 .

[72]  V. A. Ryabchenko,et al.  What causes short-term oscillations in ecosystem models of the ocean mixed layer? , 1997 .