The role of linguistic and indexical information in improved recognition of dysarthric speech.

This investigation examined perceptual learning of dysarthric speech. Forty listeners were randomly assigned to one of two identification training tasks, aimed at highlighting either the linguistic (word identification task) or indexical (speaker identification task) properties of the neurologically degraded signal. Twenty additional listeners served as a control group, passively exposed to the training stimuli. Immediately following exposure to dysarthric speech, all three listener groups completed an identical phrase transcription task. Analysis of listener transcripts revealed remarkably similar intelligibility improvements for listeners trained to attend to either the linguistic or the indexical properties of the signal. Perceptual learning effects were also evaluated with regards to underlying error patterns indicative of segmental and suprasegmental processing. The findings of this study suggest that elements within both the linguistic and indexical properties of the dysarthric signal are learnable and interact to promote improved processing of this type and severity of speech degradation. Thus, the current study extends support for the development of a model of perceptual processing in which the learning of indexical properties is encoded and retained in conjunction with linguistic properties of the signal.

[1]  Stephanie A Borrie,et al.  Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech , 2012, Language and cognitive processes.

[2]  T. Anderson,et al.  A follow-up investigation into the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Stephanie A. Borrie,et al.  Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: a review of experimental studies. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  Sven L Mattys,et al.  On building models of spoken-word recognition: When there is as much to learn from natural “oddities” as artificial normality , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Multiple routes to the perceptual learning of speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Effects of training on the acoustic phonetic representation of synthetic speech. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[8]  Benjamin Munson,et al.  The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men's sexual orientation from read speech , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[9]  J. McQueen,et al.  The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Julie M Liss,et al.  The effects of familiarization on intelligibility and lexical segmentation in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Speech Perception and Spoken Word Recognition: Past and Present , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[12]  M. Sommers,et al.  The effects of talker familiarity on spoken word identification in younger and older listeners. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[13]  S. Spitzer,et al.  Syllabic strength and lexical boundary decisions in the perception of hypokinetic dysarthric speech. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Perceptual learning of synthetic speech , 1998 .

[15]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[16]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[17]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  Robert Hagiwara,et al.  DIALECT VARIATION AND FORMANT FREQUENCY : THE AMERICAN ENGLISH VOWELS REVISITED , 1997 .

[19]  D. Pisoni,et al.  The effect of talker variability on word recognition in preschool children. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[20]  S. Goldinger.  Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  P. L. Tenpenny,et al.  Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  D. Norris.  Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[23]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  T. Carr,et al.  Limits on perceptual abstraction in reading: Asymmetric transfer between surface forms differing in typicality. , 1993 .

[25]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech Perception as a Talker-Contingent Process , 1993, Psychological science.

[26]  Iain R. Murray,et al.  Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: a review of the literature on human vocal emotion. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  D. Schacter,et al.  Auditory priming: implicit and explicit memory for words and voices. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  A. Cutler,et al.  Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception , 1992 .

[29]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[31]  G. Studebaker.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[32]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Perceiving vowels from uniform spectra: Phonetic exploration of an auditory aftereffect , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  P. Costanzo,et al.  Voice Quality Profile and Perceived Emotion. , 1969 .

[34]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[35]  W. Worlton,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming , 1968 .

[36]  C. Douglas Creelman,et al.  Case of the Unknown Talker , 1957 .

[37]  Molly Babel,et al.  Sociophonetic markers facilitate translation priming: Maori English GOAT – a different kind of animal , 2012 .

[38]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Indexical and Linguistic Channels in Speech Perception: Some Effects of Voiceovers on Advertising Outcomes 1 , 2005 .

[39]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  S. Goldinger,et al.  On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  G. Fairbanks.  Voice and articulation drillbook , 1960 .

[43]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .