Effect of Particle Size and Cohesion on Powder Yielding and Flow

The bulk properties of powders depend on material characteristics and size of the primary particles. During storage and transportation processes in the powder processing industry, the material undergoes various modes of deformation and stress conditions, e.g., due to compression or shear. In many applications, it is important to know when powders are yielding, i.e. when they start to flow under shear; in other cases it is necessary to know how much stress is needed to keep them flowing. The measurement of powder yield and flow properties is still a challenge and will be addressed in this study. In the framework of the collaborative project T-MAPPP, a large set of shear experiments using different shear devices, namely the Jenike shear tester, the ELE direct shear tester, the Schulze ring shear tester and the FT4 powder rheometer, have been carried out on eight chemically-identical limestone powders of different particle sizes in a wide range of confining stresses. These experiments serve two goals: i) to test the reproducibility/consistency among different shear devices and testing protocols; ii) to relate the bulk behaviour to microscopic particle properties, focusing on the effect of particle size and thus inter-particle cohesion. The experiments show high repeatability for all shear devices, though some of them show more fluctuations than others. All devices provide consistent results, where the FT4 powder rheometer gives lower yield/steady state stress values, due to a different pre-shearing protocol. As expected, the bulk cohesion decreases with increasing particle size (up to 150 μm), due to the decrease of inter-particle cohesion. The bulk friction, characterized in different ways, is following a similar decreasing trend, whereas the bulk density increases with particle size in this range. Interestingly, for samples with particle sizes larger than 150 μm, the bulk cohesion increases slightly, while the bulk friction increases considerably—presumably due to particle interlocking effects—up to magnitudes comparable to those of the finest powders. Furthermore, removing the fines from the coarse powder samples reduces the bulk cohesion and bulk density, but has a negligible effect on the bulk friction. In addition to providing useful insights into the role of microscopically attractive, van der Waals, gravitational and/or compressive forces for the macroscopic bulk powder flow behaviour, the experimental data provide a robust database of cohesive and frictional fine powders for industrially relevant designs such as silos, as well as for calibration and validation of models and computer simulations.

[1]  J. R. Cooke,et al.  Measuring shear properties and normal stresses generated within a rotational shear cell for consolidated and non-consolidated powders , 2009 .

[2]  Jürgen Tomas,et al.  Influences of loading rate and preloading on the mechanical properties of dry elasto‐plastic granules under compression , 2014 .

[3]  S. Luding Cohesive, frictional powders: contact models for tension , 2008 .

[4]  D. Kadau,et al.  Can one make a powder forget its history , 2003, cond-mat/0303134.

[5]  Stefan Luding,et al.  Anisotropy in cohesive, frictional granular media , 2005 .

[6]  H. B. Manbeck,et al.  Flow properties of powders using four testers — measurement, comparison and assessment , 1993 .

[7]  D. Schulze Entwicklung und Anwendung eines neuartigen Ringschergerätes , 1994 .

[8]  D. M. Walker,et al.  An annular shear cell for granular materials , 1968 .

[9]  S. Savage,et al.  The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  H. B. Manbeck,et al.  Flow property measurement using the Jenike cell for wheat flour at various moisture contents and consolidation times , 1994 .

[11]  Roux,et al.  Force Distributions in Dense Two-Dimensional Granular Systems. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[12]  M. Morgeneyer,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF POWDER PROPERTIES USING ALTERNATING STRAIN PATHS , 2003 .

[13]  J. Schwedes,et al.  Measurement of flow properites of bulk solids , 1990 .

[14]  R.J.M. Janssen,et al.  Measurements on Cohesive Powder with two Biaxial Shear Testers , 2003 .

[15]  Jürgen Tomas,et al.  Product Design of Cohesive Powders – Mechanical Properties, Compression and Flow Behavior , 2004 .

[16]  S. Luding,et al.  Slow stress relaxation behavior of cohesive powders , 2016 .

[17]  Jean-Pierre Bardet,et al.  Experimental Soil Mechanics , 1997 .

[18]  Jörg Schwedes,et al.  Measurement of flow properties of bulk solids , 1996 .

[19]  T. Mitachi,et al.  Interpretation of direct shear box testing of sands as quasi-simple shear , 1997 .

[20]  S. Barringer,et al.  Flow property measurement of food powders and sensitivity of Jenike’s hopper design methodology to the measured values , 2004 .

[21]  T. Majmudar,et al.  Contact force measurements and stress-induced anisotropy in granular materials , 2005, Nature.

[22]  A. W. Jenike Quantitative design of mass-flow bins☆ , 1967 .

[23]  Dietmar Schulze,et al.  Time‐ and Velocity‐Dependent Properties of Powders Effecting Slip‐Stick Oscillations , 2003 .

[24]  John J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Characterisation of food powder flowability , 1999 .

[25]  Farhang Radjai,et al.  Contact forces in a granular packing. , 1999, Chaos.

[26]  Reg Freeman,et al.  Measuring the flow properties of consolidated, conditioned and aerated powders — A comparative study using a powder rheometer and a rotational shear cell , 2007 .

[27]  Stefan Luding,et al.  Shear flow modeling of cohesive and frictional fine powder , 2005 .

[28]  S. Sture,et al.  Shear Band Formation in Plane Strain Experiments of Sand , 2000 .

[29]  J. Schwedes,et al.  The Development of a True Biaxial Shear Tester , 1985 .

[30]  H. Tsunakawa,et al.  Measurements of the failure properties of granular materials and cohesive powders , 1982 .

[31]  S. Luding Granular matter: So much for the jamming point , 2016 .

[32]  R. Behringer,et al.  Jamming by shear , 2011, Nature.

[33]  Fernando J. Muzzio,et al.  Comparison of three rotational shear cell testers: Powder flowability and bulk density , 2015 .

[34]  Nishant Kumar,et al.  Memory of jamming–multiscale models for soft and granular matter , 2014, Granular Matter.

[35]  S. Luding,et al.  Effect of cohesion on shear banding in quasistatic granular materials. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  M. van Hecke,et al.  Jamming of soft particles: geometry, mechanics, scaling and isostaticity , 2009, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[37]  Ah-Hyung Alissa Park,et al.  Particle Technology , 2019, Kirk‐Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology.

[38]  H J Herrmann,et al.  Ratcheting of granular materials. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[39]  D. Barletta,et al.  A comparison between powder flow property testers , 2017 .

[40]  S. Thakur,et al.  An experimental and numerical study of packing, compression, and caking behaviour of detergent powders , 2014 .

[41]  D. Schulze Powders and Bulk Solids: Behavior, Characterization, Storage and Flow , 2021 .

[42]  D. Schulze Round robin test on ring shear testers , 2011 .

[43]  Andrea J. Liu,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics: Jamming is not just cool any more , 1998, Nature.

[44]  A. W. Jenike,et al.  STORAGE AND FLOW OF SOLIDS :(REV. 1980. ) , 1980 .

[45]  M. E. Cates,et al.  Dilatancy, jamming, and the physics of granulation , 2004, cond-mat/0411586.

[46]  W. Frith,et al.  Shear-induced anisotropic microstructure in phase-separated biopolymer mixtures , 2000 .

[47]  R. J. Berry,et al.  Brookfield powder flow tester – Results of round robin tests with CRM-116 limestone powder , 2015 .

[48]  J. Ooi,et al.  Experimental study of anisotropy and non-coaxiality of granular solids , 2015 .

[49]  P. Cundall Numerical experiments on localization in frictional materials , 1989 .

[50]  Jörg Schwedes,et al.  Relaxation and Creep of Dry Bulk Solids , 2002 .

[51]  G. Midi,et al.  On dense granular flows , 2003, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[52]  Singh,et al.  Adhesion between Nanoscale Rough Surfaces. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[53]  Jörg Schwedes,et al.  Review on testers for measuring flow properties of bulk solids , 2003 .