Optimal band pass filtering of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates.

This paper investigated the performance of an optimal bandpass filtering technique to effectively identify click evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. The frequency response of the filter was optimized by maximizing the correlation coefficient between two replicate recordings (reproducibility). The optimal cut-off frequencies were also set by controlling the maximum energy loss after filtering to stop the crucial response contents being filtered along with the noise. As an additional constraint, the cut-off frequencies were forced to be outside the range of 1.6 to 4.2 kHz to avoid (in a response identification task) the spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from polarizing the cut-offs and thereby filtering fundamental frequency components, thus leading to an erroneous response classification. The best performance of the optimal filter in terms of increasing the post-filtering reproducibility was obtained when the procedure was applied to recordings whose reproducibility before filtering ranged between 60 and 80 per cent, i.e. for responses classified in most cases as partial pass.

[1]  P. Ravazzani,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions: nonlinearities and response interpretation , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  F Grandori,et al.  Neonatal hearing screening programs in Europe: towards a consensus development conference. , 1996, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[3]  P. Ravazzani,et al.  'Derived nonlinear' versus 'linear' click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1996, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[4]  M. Brocaar,et al.  Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in very-low-birth-weight infants: a cross-sectional data analysis. , 1994, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[5]  F. E. Offeciers,et al.  Numerical assessment of TOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TOAE prevalence figures. , 1996, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[6]  B. Vohr,et al.  Factors Affecting the Interpretation of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Results in Neonatal Hearing Screening , 1993 .

[7]  P. Ravazzani,et al.  An optimal filtering technique to reduce the influence of low-frequency noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, British journal of audiology.

[8]  B. Vohr,et al.  Screening infants for hearing impairment. , 1996, The Journal of pediatrics.

[9]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Time‐Windowing of Click‐Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions to Increase Signal‐to‐Noise Ratio , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[10]  M. Lutman,et al.  Reliable identification of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions using signal-processing techniques. , 1993, British journal of audiology.