The effects of four different strategies of information presentation in software training

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether learners' computer self-efficacy and prior computer knowledge influence their performance and satisfaction when presented with various instructional strategies of information presentation in computer-based software training. Seventy-eight undergraduate students were randomly assigned into four groups (a) deductive-inquisitory, which present general information first and then require learner to generates examples, (b) deductive-expository, which present general information first then present examples, (c) inductive-inquisitory, which present examples first and then require learners to discover relationship, (d) inductive-expository, which present examples first then present general information. The instructional materials were computer-based Netscape Composer 7.1 tutorials. For the comparison of inductive-inquisitory and inductive-expository groups, results indicated that learners with higher computer self-efficacy not only performed better but also were more satisfied towards inductive-inquisitory strategy for information presentation. Learners with low computer self-efficacy benefited more from the inductive-expository approach of information presentation. Furthermore, for the comparison of deductive-expository and inductive-expository groups, learners with high computer self-efficacy performed better in deductive-expository strategy, while learners with low computer self-efficacy benefited more in inductive-expository strategy. Some of the research recommendations for further research included using a larger sample size for the generality of the finding, measuring how different instructional strategies influence the learners' long term memory, and exploring other possible moderating factors and other strategies for information presentation that has positive impact on learners' performance in and satisfaction towards computer based software training.

[1]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  MICROCOMPUTER USAGE AS AN OPPORTUNITY: THE INFLUENCE OF CONTEXT IN EMPLOYEE TRAINING , 2006 .

[3]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning , 2003 .

[4]  Jung Lee The effects of students' choice of instructional control in computer-based instruction , 1998 .

[5]  Jerard Kehoe Basic Item Analysis for Multiple-Choice Tests. ERIC/AE Digest. , 1995 .

[6]  Lih-Juan ChanLin Formats and prior knowledge on learning in a computer-based lesson , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[7]  R. W. Stone,et al.  A Structural Equation Model Of End-User Satisfaction With A Computer-Based Medical Information System , 1994 .

[8]  Michael G. Morris,et al.  Assessing users' subjective quality of experience with the world wide web: an exploratory examination of temporal changes in technology acceptance , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  Larry L. Constantine,et al.  Software for Use - A Practical Guide to the Models and Methods of Usage-Centered Design , 1999 .

[10]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training , 1997 .

[11]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE TRAINING METHODS ON SELF-EFFICACY AND PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING , 1989 .

[12]  Douglas Havelka,et al.  Predicting Software Self Efficacy among Business Students: A Preliminary Assessment , 2003, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[13]  C. Warren McKinney A Comparison of the Effects of a Definition, Examples, and Nonexamples on Student Acquisition of the Concept of "Transfer Propaganda.". , 1985 .

[14]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  The end of software training? , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model , 2002 .

[16]  Malcolm L. Fleming,et al.  Instructional Message Design: Principles from the Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences , 1993 .

[17]  Robert W. Stone,et al.  A structural equation model of job performance using a computer-based order entry system , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Daniel V. Eastmond E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online , 2003 .

[19]  E. Gagné The cognitive psychology of school learning , 1985 .

[20]  Cheng Chang Pan,et al.  System use of WebCT in the light of the technology acceptance model : a student perspective , 2003 .

[21]  Stephan Dutke,et al.  Evaluation of two types of online help for application software , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[22]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Instructional Design Theory , 1971 .

[23]  Shifra Baruchson-Arbib,et al.  The use of electronic information sources by Israeli college students , 2002 .

[24]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Using Computer Simulations in Inductive Learning Strategies with Children in Science. , 1995 .

[25]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[26]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting Computer Task Performance: Personal Goal and Self-Efficacy , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[27]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Computer self-efficacy and Intention to Use Computers , 2001 .

[28]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  Just-in-time information presentation and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage , 1995 .

[31]  Fred Paas,et al.  Automation and schema acquisition in learning elementary computer programming : implications for the design of practice , 1990 .

[32]  Maria Bannert,et al.  The effects of training wheels and self-learning materials in software training , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[33]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[34]  Peter Caputi,et al.  Correlates of End-User Performance and Satisfaction with the Implementation of a Statistical Software Package , 1999 .

[35]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  A proposed model and measurement instrument for the formation of IS satisfaction: the case of end-user computing satisfaction , 2000, ICIS.

[36]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[37]  Sing-Fai Tam,et al.  Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of Computer Skills Learning Outcomes of Individuals with Physical Disabilities , 1996 .