Twin Resemblances in Motor Skills, and the Effect of Practice Thereon

* Accepted for publication by Lewis M. Terman of the Editorial Board and received in the Editorial Office, August 23, 1932. 1 The writer wishes to express his thanks to Professors L. M. Terman and J. E. Coover for criticisms and suggestions during the progress of this study.

[1]  H. Cummins.  Dermatoglyphics in twins of known chorionic history, with reference to diagnosis of the twin varieties , 1930 .

[2]  D.P.H. Percy Stocks.  A BIOMETRIC INVESTIGATION OF TWINS AND THEIR BROTHERS AND SISTERS , 1930 .

[3]  R. H. Seashore,et al.  Individual Differences in Motor Skills , 1930 .

[4]  K. Holzinger,et al.  The relative effect of nature and nurture influences on twin differences. , 1929 .

[5]  H. H. Newman.  STUDIES OF HUMAN TWINS I. METHODS OF DIAGNOSING MONOZYGOTIC AND DIZYGOTIC TWINS , 1928 .

[6]  T. Komai.  Criteria for Distinguishing Identical and Fraternal Twins , 1928, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[7]  R. H. Seashore.  Stanford motor skills unit. , 1928 .

[8]  H. Siemens.  THE DIAGNOSIS OF IDENTITY IN TWINS , 1927 .

[9]  G. Dahlberg.  Twin Births and Twins from a Hereditary Point of View. , 1926 .

[10]  F. A. C. Perrin.  An Experimental Study of Motor Ability. , 1921 .

[11]  K. Pearson.  ON THE APPEARANCE OF MULTIPLE CASES OF DISEASE IN THE SAME HOUSE , 1912 .

[12]  K. Pearson.  VII. On the General Theory of the Influence of Selection on Correlation and Variation , 2022 .

[13]  G. Whipple.  Manual of mental and physical tests , 1911 .

[14]  K. Pearson.  VI. On the Influence of Double Selection on the Variation and Correlation of two Character , 1908 .

[15]  H. H. Wilder.  Duplicate twins and double Monsters , 1904 .

[16]  Karl Pearson,et al.  Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution. XI. On the Influence of Natural Selection on the Variability and Correlation of Organs , 1903 .